Arizona Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Arizona Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Arizona reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Arizona Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start an Arizona LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Arizona Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Arizona Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 109 Arizona Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Arizona Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • In this study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[1]
  • According to the 2020 abortion statistics, minors accounted for 1,218 of the 1,3186 abortions performed that year or 93% of all abortions.[2]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data show that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased by 51%. The study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[1]
  • In 15% of the abortions, the woman gave a different justification, and in 19% of the cases, it was stated that the lady would not provide a justification.[3]
  • There were differences in the proportion of out-of-state residents who had abortions, ranging from 0.5% in Arizona to 68.7% in the District of Columbia.[1]
  • Except for 6 weeks gestation, surgical abortion accounted for the highest proportion of abortions among the 42 locations that reported them for 2019, broken down by specific weeks of pregnancy and procedure type.[1]
  • Eight abortions carried out on Arizona citizens were recorded between weeks 11 and 12, six between weeks 13 and 15, and three between weeks 16 and 19.[3]
  • 55% of the women who disclosed a different reason for seeking an abortion said they did so because they did not want to have children.[4]
  • As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[5]
  • Arizona recorded 13,097 abortions in 2019, which is 5% more than the total number of abortions reported in 2018.[3]
  • Contrarily, adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2% and 37%, respectively.[1]
  • Some 38% of reproductive-age women lived in those counties and would have had to travel elsewhere to get an abortion. One-third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[5]
  • Around 19% of all abortions in the united states were done in these states in 2017, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Guttmacher Institute’s nationwide survey of abortion.[1]
  • 76.2% of non-Hispanic black women in 29 reporting regions had abortions at 9 weeks of pregnancy, compared to 80.6%-82.4% of women in other racial and ethnic groupings.[1]
  • The total number of recorded abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio declined by 18% (from 762,755) between 2010 and 2019. 13% from 22.5 abortions per 1,000 live births and 21% from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, respectively.[1]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three-quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[1]
  • Camelback family planning and family planning associates medical group conducted 21% of all abortions, making them the two clinics with the greatest volume.[3]
  • The abortion performed on erasing residents did not include information about past live births or abortions, and fifteen of the losses did not include information about previous miscarriages.[4]
  • Hysterotomies and intrauterine installations for each gestational age group accounted for just 0.1%–1.3% of abortions.[1]
  • Several maternal traits for the 4% of abortions that were performed to safeguard the mother’s health.[2]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[1]
  • The overall number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions hit record lows in 2017, and then all indicators saw rises between 2017 and 2018 of 1% to 2%.[1]
  • However, further technological developments, such as enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy testing, have made it possible to execute extremely early surgical abortions with success rates surpassing 97%.[1]
  • Arizona mandates abortion providers to disclose how the remains of unborn children murdered by abortion are disposed of, and 99% of abortions resulted in no tissue being given in whole or in part.[3]
  • These abortions, which totaled 625,346, were from 48 reporting locations that submitted data yearly between 2010 and 2019.[1]
  • Just over 50% of them were chemical abortions, with mifepristone being used to induce them in the great majority of cases.[4]
  • A percentage based on 539,573 abortions was reported overall from the regions that complied with the requirements for reporting the quantity of prior induced abortions.[1]
  • Among the 42 areas that were reported by marital status for 2019, 14.5% of women who got an abortion were married and 85.5% were unmarried.[1]
  • In Arizona, 9% of abortions were done on women under the age of 20, 2% on women under the age of 17, and 7% on women between the ages of 18 and 19.[4]
  • In either scenario, 91% of abortions in Arizona are carried out when the gestational age is less than 13 weeks.[6]
  • Estimates of miscarriage rates and reported adolescent birth and abortion rates are used to compute teen pregnancy rates.[7]
  • Following the legislation’s passage, the number of abortion facilities in Arizona’s 15 counties fell from 33% to 13%.[8]
  • Medical professionals with a focus on obstetrics and gynecology conducted 74% of abortions, whereas general family practitioners performed 26% of them.[4]
  • Information about the medicine of just under 50% of the abortions was performed surgically, including 153 that involved an abortifacient.[4]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[5]
  • The greatest abortion rates were found in the age groups 20-24 and 25-29, with 19.0 and 18.6 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively, and the highest percentages of abortions (27.6% and 29.3%, respectively).[1]
  • The proportion of abortions carried out at 13 weeks of gestation remained low during 2010–2019 at 90%.[1]
  • Arizona tracks race and ethnicity jointly, and Hispanic women made up 41% of Arizona residents who had abortions in 2020.[4]
  • Abortion trends and statistics in Arizona for the years 2019–2020 there were 13,273 abortions reported in Arizona an increase of one from.[4]
  • At 7-9 weeks of gestation, 52.2% of abortions were surgical. 93.2% of abortions during 10-13 weeks of pregnancy 96.9%-99.2% of abortions at 14-20 weeks of pregnancy and 87.0% at 21 weeks of pregnancy.[1]
  • Abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy varied very little by race and ethnicity, with 78% of non-Hispanic black women having abortions as opposed to 61%-77% of women from other racial and ethnic groups.[1]
  • From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of all abortions by early medical abortion climbed by 12.3% among regions that reported by technique type and included medical abortion in their reporting form.[1]
  • However, the survey reveals that 84% of abortions were chosen voluntarily, while just 14% and 12%, respectively, were carried out for reasons related to the health or well-being of the mother or the fetus.[3]
  • In Arizona, the rate of chemical abortions performed on citizens rose by 4% between 2018 and 2019.[3]
  • However, for 44% of Arizona’s abortion-seeking women, the status of their schooling was not disclosed.[3]
  • In these 35 locations, the rate of early medical abortion grew by 10% between 2018 and 2019, from 37.5% to 41.1%, and by 12.3% between 2010 and 2019, from 18.4% to 41.1%.[1]
  • Most abortions occurred at 9 weeks gestation in each category for these parameters.[1]
  • In information about medicine in Arizona, surgical abortions accounted for 60% of recorded abortions, while chemical abortions accounted for 40%.[3]
  • The proportion of abortions conducted at 13 weeks gestation increased a little from 91.9% to 92% among the 34 reporting locations that reported data on gestational age per year for 2010–2019.[1]
  • However, the four abortion facilities owned by planned parenthood together accounted for 45% of the abortions carried out on Arizonans.[3]
  • According to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2014, 49% of residents in Arizona thought abortion should be allowed in all or most circumstances, while 47% said it should be outlawed in all or most circumstances.[9]
  • At 14-20 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10% fewer abortions.[1]
  • Camelback family planning conducted 25% of the abortions for Arizona residents, while family planning associates’ medical group performed 21% of the abortions.[4]
  • For instance, over 95% of abortions are carried out at fewer than 15 weeks of gestation, a significant number is given that, starting in the autumn, abortions are expected to be restricted to those carried out at less than 15 weeks.[2]
  • In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out during 9 weeks gestation, and 92.7% were carried out at 13 weeks.[1]
  • In the 43 regions that provided information on gestational age at the time of abortion for 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out at 9 weeks, and almost all (92.7% ).[1]
  • Overall, in Arizona, 5% of abortions were done on women who had had one prior pregnancy, 48% on those who had had two or more, and 2% on those whose past pregnancies had not been disclosed.[3]
  • Similarly, the discovery of early medical abortion regimens has made it possible to execute abortions at an early stage of pregnancy. Completion rates for these regimens, which include mifepristone and misoprostol, have reached 96%-98%.[1]
  • Similarly, following passaging this legislation, the percentage of abortions carried out in Arizona before 14 weeks of gestation fell by 33%.[8]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the united states in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[5]
  • In Arizona, unmarried women received 86% of abortions, while married women received only 14% of abortions.[3]
  • The number of abortions rose by 2% from 2018 to 2019. The abortion rate increased by 0.9% and the abortion ratio increased by 3%.[1]
  • Nine of the unborn children murdered via abortion were administered anesthetic, as opposed to ninety-one who were not.[4]
  • About 4% of abortions were carried out because of domestic abuse, while 3% were carried out because of sexual assault.[4]
  • State report demographics summary of the abortions reported in Arizona in 99% were performed in Arizona residents.[4]
  • The age categories had a decline in abortion rates from 2010 to 2019, although teenagers experienced the largest declines—by 60% and 50%, respectively—among all older age groups.[1]
  • In Arizona, 64% of abortions were done on women who had never had one, compared to 23% on women who had had one before and 11% on women who had had two or more.[4]
  • With 39% of all abortions performed in Arizona in 2019, Hispanic women were the race with the highest rate, closely followed by non-Hispanic white women with 37%.[3]
  • According to research done in the United States in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[1]
  • 43% said they had never given birth to a live baby before. 80% had never had a miscarriage, and 65% had never had an abortion before.[3]
  • According to the most recent information from the Arizona department of health services, 636 of the 13,186 abortions carried out in Arizona in 2020 occurred beyond 15 weeks of pregnancy.[10]
  • According to the Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arizona’s abortion rate rose by 4% to 9.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44.[3]
  • Arizona citizens had 1% more abortions done on them, but their rate of chemical abortions climbed by 27%.[4]
  • For these 48 reporting locations, the percentage change in abortion measures from the most recent past year 2018 to 2019 and for the 10 years of study 2010 to 2019 were computed.[1]
  • Planned parenthood accounted for 41% of the abortions with 14% each at planned parenthood Tempe and Glendale Centers at the Tucson core, 13% of the population, and a mere 1% in flagstaff.[4]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[5]
  • The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age lived in states that restrict access to abortion.[11]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[12]
  • The abortion performed on Arizona residents did not include information about past live births or abortions, and fifteen of the losses did not include information about previous miscarriages.[4]
  • According to research done in the united states in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[1]

Arizona Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • In contrast to the expenditures that would have been spent had the rates not decreased, the taxpayers were spared about 287 million in 2010 alone because of the steps we’ve taken to reduce adolescent pregnancy.[13]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[14]
  • In Alabama, 74% of adolescent births occur to older youths ages 18 to 19, and 16% occur to minors who are already parents.[14]
  • Since 2006, the Tucson MSA’s adolescent birth rate has decreased by 63.1%, the state of Arizona’s by 64.6%, and the U.S. as a whole by 50%.[15]
  • The adolescent birth rate in Alabama has significantly declined over the previous several decades, by around 63% since 1991.[14]
  • The 25.9% child poverty rate in New Mexico is a significant contributor to adolescent pregnancies.[14]
  • Because of their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 48 per 1,000 women.[14]
  • According to a compilation of studies by Dr. Stanley Swierczewski, adolescent pregnancies end up costing around $7 billion yearly in lost tax income, public assistance, child health care, and increased expenditures for foster care and the criminal justice system.[16]

Arizona Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • We used each state’s proportion of high school graduates who took the SAT in 2005–2006 to estimate the statewide level of education among teenagers.[7]
  • Within five years following the birth of their first child, over 50% of all teenage moms and over 75% of teenage mothers who are not married started collecting assistance.[17]
  • Less than half of teenagers in school get any information on birth control, even though 80% of them are told to abstain from sexual activity.[16]
  • For example, a recent study 49 attributes 52% of all unintended pregnancies by teenagers and adults in the nonuse of contraception 43% are because of inconsistent or improper usage, whereas just 5% are because of technique failure.[7]

Arizona Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • Teens who are driven to attend college are more likely to end their pregnancies than they are to get pregnant. I.e., educational aspirations impact whether to bring a pregnancy to term.[7]
  • According to previous assessments, participants in the 10-12-week program had a 33% lower pregnancy rate, 14% fewer school suspensions, and 11% fewer missed courses.[16]

Arizona Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • The most prevalent reported impairment in Arizona is an ambulatory disability, which is defined as having extreme difficulty walking or ascending stairs, at 71%.[5]
  • Contrarily, whereas these two disorders made for 42% of children getting ideal help, autism accounted for 27% of all disabilities among Asian students.[4]
  • In New Mexico, 81% of minors who gave birth in 2017 were Hispanic, as were 55.1% of female youths aged 15 to 19 who identify as Hispanic.[14]
  • In contrast, the number of pupils getting idea services decreased by around 1% between 2019–2020 and 2020–2021.[18]
  • Approximately 88% of births to females between the ages of 15 and 17 are undesired and unplanned.[16]
  • A birth resulted in around 50% of pregnancies, and birth results were greater in those aged 18 to 19 years.[19]
  • Child mortality increased 15% from 258 to 296 deaths per 100,000 children ages 119 between 2014-2016 and 2017- 2019.[20]
  • The proportion of children with speech or language impairments who spent 80% or more of the school day in regular classrooms in the autumn of 2020 was 88%.[3]
  • Descriptive statistics by abstinence education level 95% results of the confidence interval level n median.[7]
  • The percentage of Arizonians with disabilities who completed four years of college was 17.5%. 18 percentage points higher than the nation, though still lower than the population aged 25 for the state, which was 28%.[3]
  • In 40.2%, 24.5%, and 20% of the 45 regions that reported the number of prior live births in 2019, 92% and 60% of women had zero, one, two, three, or four or more previous live births.[1]
  • Individuals with disabilities had significantly lowered employment rates than those without (34.1% and 72.6%, respectively).[4]
  • Arizona had a significantly lower employment rate for people with disabilities in 2016 than the U.S., which was 34.6%.[4]
  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020 Initiative aims to raise the proportion of planned pregnancies from the 51% recorded in 2002 to 56% by 2020.[21]
  • However, at 4% to 5% of the overall student population, that figure is probably low given that most figures place the percentage of Americans who identify as having a handicap at anywhere between 12% and 19%.[3]

Also Read

How Useful is Arizona Abortion

One of the main arguments in favor of Arizona abortion laws is that they protect the potential life of the unborn child. Those who support these laws believe that every life is sacred and should be protected from the moment of conception. By restricting access to abortion, proponents argue that they are upholding a fundamental moral value.

Another reason often cited in support of Arizona abortion laws is the belief that they help regulate and standardize the practice of abortion. By setting specific guidelines and restrictions on when and how abortions can be performed, these laws aim to ensure that the procedure is carried out safely and ethically. Proponents of such laws argue that they help prevent unsafe and dangerous abortion practices that can harm women.

On the other hand, opponents of Arizona abortion laws argue that they impose unnecessary restrictions on women’s healthcare choices. They believe that a woman should have the right to make decisions about her own body without governmental interference. By placing limitations on abortion access, opponents argue that these laws can potentially harm women’s health and well-being.

Furthermore, some critics of Arizona abortion laws argue that they disproportionately affect marginalized and low-income communities. Restrictions on abortion access can make it difficult for women in these communities to access safe and legal abortion services. This can lead to inequities in healthcare access and outcomes, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.

Another point of contention is the role of personal autonomy and bodily autonomy in the debate over Arizona abortion laws. Those who oppose such laws argue that a woman should have the right to make decisions about her own body, including whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. They believe that imposing restrictions on abortion access violates a woman’s fundamental right to bodily autonomy.

In conclusion, the usefulness of Arizona abortion laws is a complex and multi-faceted issue. While proponents argue that such laws protect the rights of the unborn and regulate the practice of abortion, opponents claim that they restrict women’s healthcare choices and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Ultimately, the debate over the usefulness of Arizona abortion laws comes down to differing beliefs and values about when life begins, the rights of women, and the role of government in healthcare decisions.


  1. cdc –
  2. azpha –
  3. lozierinstitute –
  4. lozierinstitute –
  5. guttmacher –
  6. abc15 –
  7. nih –
  8. nih –
  9. wikipedia –
  10. npr –
  11. politico –
  12. powertodecide –
  13. azdhs –
  14. worldpopulationreview –
  15. arizona –
  16. wmicentral –
  17. thehouseofelelyon –
  18. prochoiceamerica –
  19. nih –
  20. americashealthrankings –
  21. arizonafamilyhealth –
  22. abort73 –

Leave a Comment