Data De-identification and Pseudonymity Statistics


Steve Bennett
Steve Bennett
Business Formation Expert
Steve runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity Statistics 2025: Facts about Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity Statistics 2025

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 10 Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity Statistics on this page 🙂

Data De-Identification And Pseudonymity “Latest” Statistics

  • According to one well-known research, it is feasible to individually identify 87 percent of the US population with only three data points: a five-digit ZIP code, gender, and date of birth.[1]
  • When using the Safe Harbor de-identification technique, the first three digits of a ZIP code are converted to 000 for any such geographic area with 20,000 or fewer persons.[2]
  • The technique used by Rocher, Hendrickx, and Montjoye achieves AUC values for predicting individual uniqueness ranging from 0.84 to 0.97 on 210 populations, with a low false-discovery rate.[3]
  • Rocher, Hendrickx, and Montjoye discovered that 99.98% of Americans could be successfully re-identified in any dataset using 15 demographic parameters using our approach.[3]
  • According to a recent poll, more than 72% of US residents are concerned about sharing personal information online.[3]
  • Journalists re-identified politicians in an anonymized browser history dataset of 3 million German residents in 2016, revealing their medical information and sexual preferences.[3]
  • The Australian Department of Health made de-identified medical information available to the public for 10% of the population, only for researchers to re-identify them six weeks later.[3]
  • 15 demographic characteristics would distinguish 99.98% of persons in Massachusetts.[3]
  • According to 2010 data, 19% of healthcare businesses had a data breach in the preceding year (HIMSS Analytics, 2010).[4]
  • When using the Safe Harbor method of de-identification, all elements of dates (except year) for dates that are directly related to an individual, such as birth date, admission date, discharge date, death date, and all ages over 89, as well as all elements of dates (including year) indicative of such age, may be aggregated into a single category of age 90 or older.[2]

Also Read

How Useful is Data De Identification and Pseudonymity

De-identification involves removing or altering personal identifiers from data sets to make it more difficult to link the information back to an individual. Pseudonymity, on the other hand, involves replacing identifiers with pseudonyms or aliases to provide a layer of anonymity while still allowing for some level of data analysis.

The use of de-identification and pseudonymity can be extremely useful in a variety of situations. For example, in healthcare, patient data must be protected to comply with privacy regulations such as HIPAA. By de-identifying data before sharing it with researchers or other parties, healthcare organizations can ensure patient confidentiality while still allowing for valuable analysis to improve treatments and outcomes.

Similarly, in financial services, de-identification and pseudonymity can be used to protect sensitive information such as account details or transaction history. By replacing names or account numbers with random identifiers, financial institutions can share data securely while preventing unauthorized access to personal information.

In the realm of research, de-identification and pseudonymity play a crucial role in facilitating data sharing and collaboration among scientists. By anonymizing data sets, researchers can exchange information without risking the privacy of study participants or compromising the integrity of their research findings.

However, despite their benefits, de-identification and pseudonymity are not foolproof. While these techniques can help protect privacy to some extent, they are not a guarantee of anonymity. With the rise of sophisticated data mining tools and techniques, it has become increasingly challenging to fully anonymize data sets and prevent re-identification.

Recent studies have shown that even supposedly anonymized data sets can be re-identified using advanced algorithms and cross-referencing techniques. This raises concerns about the efficacy of de-identification and pseudonymity in safeguarding privacy in the age of big data.

Moreover, the widespread use of de-identification and pseudonymity has led to a false sense of security among data owners and users. Many people assume that by simply removing personal identifiers from data, they are adequately protecting privacy. However, without proper safeguards and additional security measures, de-identified data remains vulnerable to privacy breaches and unauthorized access.

In conclusion, while de-identification and pseudonymity are valuable tools for enhancing data privacy and facilitating data sharing, they should not be viewed as a panacea for all privacy concerns. To effectively protect sensitive information in the digital age, organizations and individuals must adopt a comprehensive approach to data privacy that includes encryption, access controls, and other security measures in addition to de-identification and pseudonymity. It is essential to be aware of the limitations of these techniques and take proactive steps to mitigate privacy risks in an increasingly data-driven world.

Reference

  1. iapp – https://iapp.org/news/a/looking-to-comply-with-gdpr-heres-a-primer-on-anonymization-and-pseudonymization/
  2. hhs – https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html
  3. nature – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10933-3
  4. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285994/

Leave a Comment