Disclosure Management Software Statistics 2025

In the increasingly complex world of corporate governance, disclosure management software serves as a critical linchpin for ensuring transparency, compliance, and accountability. The statistics surrounding the adoption, utilization, and impact of disclosure management software in 2025 are indispensable for understanding how businesses navigate regulatory landscapes and enhance stakeholder confidence. As companies face heightened scrutiny and regulatory demands, the role of these tools becomes ever more paramount.

Key stakeholders such as corporate executives, compliance officers, and investors will find the data on disclosure management software immensely valuable. For executives and compliance officers, these statistics offer insights into best practices and industry benchmarks crucial for maintaining compliance and mitigating risk. Investors, on the other hand, can leverage this information to assess the robustness of a company’s governance practices, influencing investment decisions and strategies. The growing importance of disclosure management software underscores not just its utility but also its transformative impact on the industry.

By delving into these statistics, stakeholders can better navigate the rapidly evolving business environment, making informed decisions and shaping strategic approaches that align with regulatory expectations and market realities. Understanding these trends equips businesses with the knowledge to stay ahead of the curve, fostering a culture of transparency and integrity that can drive sustainable growth.

Check our review: Best LLC Service, LegalZoom LLC Reviews, ZenBusiness Reviews, NorthWest Registered Agent Reviews

Top Disclosure Management Software Statistics 2025

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find Disclosure Management Software facts. There are total 112 Disclosure Management Software Statistics on this page 🙂

Regulatory Compliance

• Disclosures may need to be more robust than in the past (e.g., US GAAP or IFRS reporting), or reporting deadlines may be more aggressive (e.g., 45-60 days after quarter-end). ^[?]
• The guidance in this chapter is intended to supplement the principles now set out in Annex A of the Attorney Generals Guidance on Disclosure 2022. ^[2]
• Prosecutors should also have reference to A guide to “reasonable lines of enquiry” and Communications Evidence and the principles set out by the Court of Appeal in R v E [?] EWCA 2426 (Crim) and R v Bater-James [?] EWCA Crim 790. ^[2]
• The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) provides powers to seize and retain anything for which the search has been authorized, other than items attracting legal professional privilege. ^[2]
• Alternatively, when originals are taken, investigators must be prepared to copy or image the material for the owners when reasonably practicable in accordance with PACE 1984 Code B 7.17. ^[2]
• No digital material may be requested or seized which an investigator has reasonable grounds for believing to be subject to legal professional privilege (LPP), other than under the additional powers of seizure in the CJPA 2001. ^[2]
• The CJPA 2001 enables an investigator to seize relevant items which contain LPP material where it is not reasonably practicable on the search premises to separate LPP material from non-LPP material. ^[2]
• Material seized under sections 50 and 51 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 may be retained or returned in accordance with sections 53-58 of that Act. ^[2]
• Under section 22 of PACE, an image of the digital device can be made and the device itself returned. ^[2]
• The duty of the court to actively manage the case is established by rule 3.2 of the Criminal Procedure Rules. ^[2]
• The revised Code of Practice to the CPIA 1996 requires that the disclosure officer should ensure that each item of material is listed separately on the schedule and is numbered consecutively. ^[6]
• The description of each item should make clear the nature of the item and should contain sufficient detail to enable the prosecutor to decide whether they need to inspect the material before deciding whether or not it should be disclosed. ^[6]
• CPIA 1996 establishes a disclosure test that requires the prosecution to disclose any unused material that might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case or of assisting the case for the accused. ^[6]
• The disclosure of sensitive material may be withheld on public interest grounds under a Public Interest Immunity (PII) application. ^[6]
• Disclosure of digital evidence fits within the framework of CPIA 1996; in principle, the digital data is material. ^[6]
• This can be a fraught process with some digital material initially assessed as irrelevant data on its own merit, but this data may be metadata with the ability to add value and substance to other identified relevant data. ^[6]
• House of Lords, R v H and C [?] UKHL 3. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040205/hc-1.htm. ^[3]
• Form MG6C, see CPS Disclosure Manual (revised 14th Dec. 2018), Chap.6 and NPCC, CPS, National Disclosure Standards, March 2019. https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/legal_guidance/National-Disclosure-Standards-2018.pdf. ^[3]
• Revised Code of Practice to the CPIA 1996 (s.23(1)), para 6.11. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/criminal-procedure-and-investigations-act-code-of-practice. ^[3]
• Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s.3 (as amended by Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c.44)). ^[3]

Legal Cases And Principles

• In R v Pearson and Cadman[?] EWCA Crim 3366, in which there was digital material that would have taken at least a lifetime to read, Hughes LJ VP confirmed that it was perfectly proper for the Crown to search it by sample or, as here, by key words. ^[2]
• In the case of R v E [?] EWCA Crim 2426, the President of the Queens Bench Division endorsed key CPS guidance Guidelines on Communication Evidence and A Guide to reasonable lines of inquiry and Communications Evidence. ^[2]
• This approach was endorsed and developed in R v Bater-James [?] EWCA Crim 790, in which the Court of Appeal identified four principles relevant when reviewing a reasonable line of enquiry. ^[2]
• A highly relevant or determinative consideration will be the adequacy of the trial process, and whether it will ensure there is fairness to the defendant, particularly by way of cross-examination of the witness, coupled with appropriate judicial directions (see also Charnock [?] EWCA Crim 100). ^[2]
• Where digital devices are obtained, relevant data should be extracted as soon as possible and the device returned once the extraction is complete (see Bater-James para 88). ^[2]
• The Attorney General’s Guidelines and the ruling of the Court of Appeal in the case of R v R and Others [?] EWCA Crim 1941 clearly envisage that the defense should provide early and meaningful engagement. ^[2]

Check our llc formation guides: Florida LLC, California LLC, Texas LLC, New York LLC, Ohio LLC, Illinois LLC

Technology And Digital Forensics

• The underlying technology is rapidly evolving and has presented a new set of challenges for digital forensics investigators. ^[6]
• Over the last 20 years, various eras of mobile forensics have been identified which reflect the state of the discipline at that time. ^[6]
• Smartphones are potentially very valuable within a forensic investigation, due to the wealth of data they can hold regarding user activity and events. ^[6]
• Newer research aims to modernize process models to mimic the advancements in digital forensics. ^[6]
• Whilst the lifecycle may vary between organizations across the globe, the fundamental lifecycle often used remains very similar and comprises several key stages. ^[6]
• These variables themselves present an ongoing challenge to the field of Digital Forensics and as a result, the field must constantly adapt to ensure that new emerging technologies can be collected, analyzed, and reported upon. ^[6]
• During the collection stage, the Digital Forensic Investigator can employ several techniques to extract data from mobile devices. ^[6]
• In an attempt to overcome these challenges, investigators often employ the use of Digital Evidence Strategies, also commonly known as Digital Investigative Strategies. ^[6]

Market Insights And Trends

• The Disclosure Management Market size is estimated at USD 1.20 billion in 2024, and is expected to reach USD 2.56 billion by 2029, growing at a CAGR of 16.5% during the forecast period (2024-2029). ^[7]
• In 2025, the Disclosure Management Market size is expected to reach USD 1.20 billion. ^[7]
• Asia Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR over the forecast period (2024-2029). ^[7]
• In 2025, North America accounts for the largest market share in the Disclosure Management Market. ^[7]
• In 2023, the Disclosure Management Market size was estimated at USD 1.00 billion. ^[7]
• The report covers the Disclosure Management Market historical market size for years: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. ^[7]
• The report also forecasts the Disclosure Management Market size for years: 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2029. ^[7]
• Disclosure Management analysis includes a market forecast outlook for 2024 to 2029 and historical overview. ^[7]
• The Disclosure Management Market size is expected to grow from USD 1.03 billion in 2023 to USD 2.20 billion by 2028, at a CAGR of 16.50% during the forecast period (2023-2028). ^[16]
• The rise of digital transformation and the growing demand for hyper-personalized products and services are prompting many companies to reconsider how they manage their disclosure process. ^[16]
• In December 2022, IRIS Business Services, a SaaS RegTech company based in India, launched the latest version of its financial disclosure management solution. ^[16]
• The solution, which is part of the IRIS CARBON range of products, is Office 365-based and serves global organizations with structured financial reporting and analytics. ^[16]
• With a compound annual growth rate of 16.5% forecast from 2025 to 2029, the industry is primed for an era of dynamic evolution and sustained market growth. ^[18]
• The global disclosure management market size was valued at USD 890.80 million in 2022. ^[20]
• It is projected to reach USD 3,453.96 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 16.25% during the forecast period (2023-2031). ^[20]

Adoption And Integration

• With the recent uptick in the adoption of the cloud among different end users, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the offerings of DAM systems. ^[7]
• For instance, according to a survey by MariaDB, 40% of global respondents accelerated their move to the cloud, and 51% planned to drive more applications to the cloud to prepare for future COVID-19 shutdowns. ^[7]
• In June 2023, Insight Software, the player in analytics, reporting, and performance management solutions, announced the integration of a Spreadsheet Server with Infor Financials and Supply Management (FSM). ^[7]
• May 2023: Workiva Inc. announced a multi-year partnership with the non-profit organization Code.org. ^[7]
• February 2023: Insight Software acquired Power ON, enhancing its operational planning solutions by integrating Microsoft Power BI. ^[7]
• May 2023: Donnelley Financial Solutions and Salesforce joined forces to provide cutting-edge ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data management and reporting technology. ^[7]
• January 2023: Trintech and Jeeves Information Systems, a prominent ERP software solution provider catering to mid-sized businesses, announced their reseller partnership in Sweden. ^[7]
• The cloud deployment model is expected to exhibit a higher adoption rate during the forecast period, due to the rising demand for 24/7 availability of accessible information along with low-cost maintenance services. ^[19]

Hr Technology And Challenges

• HR leaders consider HR technology as the top investment priority for 2023. ^[4]
• Additionally, 46% of HR leaders plan to increase investments in HR technology. ^[4]
• According to a recent Gartner survey, 44% of respondents identified driving better business outcomes as the top strategic priority for HR technology in the next three years. ^[4]
• With 44% of respondents identifying driving better business outcomes as their top priority, it underscores the shift from merely automating HR processes to leveraging technology as a strategic asset for business growth. ^[4]
• In 2023, business leaders will prioritize the seamless integration of existing tools in their technology stacks. ^[4]
• 83% of HR leaders lack the right HR technology, with only 59% using HR analytics and 54% utilizing automation. ^[4]
• More than one-third (36%) of respondents indicate a likelihood of switching vendors when their subscription term ends. ^[4]
• HR leaders face challenges in adopting disruptive technologies, primarily due to implementation costs (23%) and a lack of a compelling use case (20%). ^[4]
• Data security is the top priority for 53% of survey respondents when selecting HR tech. ^[4]
• Ease of use (46%), agility (43%), depth of functionality (37%), and configurability (29%) are also important factors in the decision-making process. ^[4]
• Less than one-fourth (21%) of organizations offer personalized HR services and experiences to a high or very high extent. ^[4]

Digital Transformation

• Digital transformation is reshaping the business world, with a staggering 91% of businesses embarking on digital initiatives. ^[5]
• However, successful digital transformation is challenging, as evidenced by the fact that only 16% of organizations report success in their digital transformation efforts, often hindered by poor digital adoption rates. ^[5]
• By 2025, 70% of organizations will use digital adoption platforms across the entire technology stack to overcome still insufficient application user experiences. ^[5]
• Good onboarding is the key to success for any organization; poor onboarding could cost up to 213% of the employee’s salary. ^[5]
• Accentures 2021 study demonstrates that high-growth companies actively integrate next-generation technologies like AI and cloud at scale. ^[5]
• McKinsey’s 2022 report underscores the importance of bridging this digital skill gap for organizations aiming to lead in digital innovation and secure a competitive edge. ^[5]
• Research supports this, with a 2020 report from Deloitte highlighting that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) investing in digital tools saw a 26% increase in productivity. ^[5]
• Additionally, a study by IDC reveals that businesses delaying digital transformation risk losing up to 39% of their revenue to competitors who embrace digital innovation. ^[5]
• A 2021 Forrester report underscores the importance of simplifying tech stacks and streamlining information access to combat this issue. ^[5]
• According to IDC, global spending on technologies and services that enable digital transformation will reach $2.3 trillion by 2023. ^[5]

Financial Performance And Reporting

• Emerging technologies like Blockchain (Projected to grow from $7.18 billion in 2022 to $163.83 billion by 2029) will further revolutionize financial reporting by providing a secure and transparent platform for recording and sharing financial information. ^[8]
• In 2025, we can expect to see a significant increase in the use of automation and AI in financial reporting. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see a greater focus on sustainability reporting, with businesses reporting on their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see an increased emphasis on cybersecurity with businesses implementing more robust security measures to protect their financial data. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see a growing adoption of XBRL in financial reporting, particularly in regulatory reporting. ^[9]
• Data analytics is becoming increasingly important in 2024, providing businesses with insights into their financial performance and helping them to make more informed decisions. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see an increased focus on real-time reporting, providing stakeholders with up-to-date information on a company’s financial performance. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see an increased scrutiny of non-GAAP financial measures, with regulators and investors paying closer attention to these measures. ^[9]
• In 2025, we can expect to see an increased adoption of cloud-based accounting software, with businesses using these tools to improve their financial performance and reporting. ^[9]
• According to Deloitte, 82.4% of public company hiring managers for finance and accounting report talent retention as a big challenge. ^[17]

Software And Technology Solutions

• Automated onboarding guidance & in-app support for 30k users within an average of 2 months. ^[5]
• Enterprise digital adoption tools help employees complete I-9 forms, find paystubs, create reports or time sheets, and lead them through a full process from start to finish with reduced errors and a seamless experience. ^[5]
• Seamless ITSM Processes for Reduced IT FTE Costs: DAPs reduce ad-hoc level 1 ticket requests by guiding users through ITSM tools like ServiceNow. ^[5]
• Implement quicker resolution times when level 1 tickets are resolved in-app with self-help widgets across departments and data input errors are reduced due to enforced process compliance features. ^[5]
• Join 6000+ monthly readers learning about best practices, solutions, and strategies to drive software adoption. ^[5]
• Apty: Recognized as a Leader among Digital Adoption Platforms in IDC MarketScape 2024. ^[5]
• 1524 S I-35 Frontage Road, Suite 224, Austin, TX – 78704. ^[5]
• The platform is currently used by WD-40, Blackstone, and Air France. ^[13]
• Robust data security (SOC 1, SOC 2, ISAE 3000, and ISAE 3402 certifications). ^[13]
• More than 3,000 active customers across the globe rely on Prophix to achieve organizational success. ^[21]

Market Challenges And Innovations

• The cost of implementation (23%) is a significant deterrent, primarily for small and medium-sized businesses operating on tight budgets. ^[4]
• Similarly, the lack of a compelling use case (20%) can hinder technology adoption. ^[4]
• According to guidelines published by the Attorney General, the CPIA 1996 aims to ensure that criminal investigations are conducted in a fair, objective, and thorough manner. ^[6]
• Fair disclosure to the accused is an inseparable part of a fair trial. ^[6]
• This explicit link between effective disclosure and the fair trial rights of the accused means that failures of disclosure by the prosecution can have serious implications under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). ^[6]
• CPIA 1996 endeavors to set standards and procedures to regulate the investigation process and manage the recording and retention of all material found or generated in the course of an investigation. ^[6]
• Further, the court held that Proper record-keeping in an investigation is essential to the integrity of an investigation, to public confidence in police investigations, and the proper administration of justice. ^[10]

Organizational Strategies And Governance

• All investigators have a responsibility to carry out the duties imposed under CPIA 1996, including recording relevant information and retaining records of the information and other material from the outset of the investigation. ^[6]
• Material may be relevant to an investigation if it appears that it has some bearing on any offense under investigation or any person being investigated, or on the surrounding circumstances of the case unless it is incapable of having any impact on the case. ^[11]
• The disclosure officer will have responsibility for ensuring that material generated during an investigation is properly recorded on a Schedule of Unused Material. ^[12]
• The revised Code of Practice to the CPIA 1996 requires that the disclosure officer should ensure that each item of material is listed separately on the schedule and is numbered consecutively. ^[13]
• The description of each item should make clear the nature of the item and should contain sufficient detail to enable the prosecutor to decide whether they need to inspect the material before deciding whether or not it should be disclosed. ^[14]
• CPIA 1996 establishes a disclosure test that requires the prosecution to disclose any unused material that might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case or of assisting the case for the accused. ^[15]

Financial Management And Reporting

• PORTLAND, Ore., April 14, 2020 – NAVEX Global, the leader in integrated risk and compliance management solutions, today announced the availability of COI Disclosures,

Also Read