District of Columbia Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

District of Columbia Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in District of Columbia reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on District of Columbia Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a District of Columbia LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will District of Columbia Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top District of Columbia Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 123 District Of Columbia Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

District Of Columbia Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • According to the CDC, 40% of the forty-one women who had abortions in 2019 had no prior live births at the time of the procedure.[1]
  • The abortion rate fell during this time, from 3.9% among females aged 15 to 27, 10.1% among those aged 15 to 17, and 5.4% among those aged 18 to 19, from 39.6 to 37.5.[2]
  • According to the CDC, two women died in the U.S. in 2018 through induced abortions, both of which were legal.[1]
  • The more local abortion options were accessible beginning in 1973, the less likely a woman was to go to New York for an abortion, and the less likely she was to end her pregnancy in the state.[3]
  • From 2018 to 2019, the number of abortions increased by 2% both the abortion rate and ratio rose by 3% and 0.9%, respectively.[4]
  • The proportion of abortions carried out at 13 weeks of gestation remained low during 2010–2019 at 9.0%.[4]
  • The age categories had a decline in abortion rates from 2010 to 2019, although teenagers experienced the largest declines—by 60% and 50%, respectively—among all older age groups.[4]
  • Guttmacher observed a 2% rise between 2014 and 2017 when examining clinics alone, which is the total number of specialized and nonspecialized clinics for abortion in the U.S.[1]
  • Because 97% of Hispanic women who gave birth to live children in 1990 were white, it included data on abortions within this population in estimations of pregnancy rates.[5]
  • In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out during 9 weeks gestation, and 92.7% at 13 weeks.[4]
  • According to the CDC, which had data on abortions from 41 states, most women in New York who had abortions in 2019 were 85% single and 15% married women.[1]
  • Rhode Island, where the pregnancy rate rose by 17%, but the abortion rate stayed the same, serves as an example of a distinct trend.[6]
  • Similarly, the discovery of early medical abortion regimens has made it possible to execute abortions at an early stage of pregnancy. Completion rates for these regimens, which include mifepristone and misoprostol, have reached 96%-98% (78-81).[4]
  • The percentage based on 539,573 abortions was reported overall from the regions that complied with the requirements for reporting the quantity of prior induced abortions.[4]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control, out-of-state residents had abortions cases of 68.7% in the District of Columbia.[7]
  • According to statistics from Guttmacher, the three reporting regions of California, Maryland, and New Hampshire handled around 19% of all abortions performed in the U.S. in 2017.[1]
  • These abortions, which totaled 625,346, were from 48 reporting locations that submitted data yearly between 2010 and 2019.[4]
  • 90% of abortions with known gestation in 1971 were carried out in the first four months of pregnancy, making births from the same conception cohort in 1972 around six months later.[3]
  • One-fourth of women (25%) who had abortions in 2019 had one previous live birth, 20% had two prior live births, 9% had three, and 6% had four or more previous live births.[1]
  • There were differences in the proportion of out-of-state residents who had abortions, ranging from 0.5% in Arizona to 68.7% in the District of Columbia.[4]
  • In 2017, 0% of the counties in the District of Columbia lacked abortion facilities, and 0% of women in the District of Columbia lived there1.[8]
  • At 7-9 weeks of gestation, 52.2% of abortions were surgical. 93.2% of abortions during 10-13 weeks of pregnancy 96.9%-99.2% of abortions at 14-20 weeks gestation and 87% of abortions at 21 weeks gestation.[4]
  • Most women who had abortions in the District of Columbia and the 47 states that submitted data to the CDC in 2019 were in their 20s (57%).[1]
  • Among the 42 areas that were reported by marital status for 2019, 14.5% of women who got an abortion were married and 85.5% were unmarried.[4]
  • Among the 42 areas that reported abortions categorized by individual weeks of gestation and method type for 2019, surgical abortion accounted for the largest percentage of abortions within every gestational age category, except 6 weeks of gestation.[4]
  • More current data from the Guttmacher Institute’s census of abortion providers reveals that after decades of decrease, the number of abortions in the U.S. climbed by 8% between 2017 and 2020.[9]
  • The total number of recorded abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio declined by 18% from 762,755 between 2010 and 2019, 21% from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and 13% from 225 abortions per 1,000 live births, respectively.[4]
  • From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of all abortions by early medical abortion climbed by 12.3% among regions that reported by technique type and included medical abortion in their reporting form.[4]
  • According to the CDC, the number of women dying each year through induced abortions has fluctuated from two to twelve since 1990.[1]
  • Expected fetal losses, such as spontaneous abortions and stillbirths among females aged 19 years, were added to 97% of live births, 94% of legally induced abortions, and the estimated number of pregnancies.[2]
  • In 26 of the 40 states, older teens’ abortion rates have decreased as well; the decreases in 11 of these states have surpassed 20%.[6]
  • Compared to states where abortion is illegal prior to Roe, the two studies revealed that birth rates fell by around 4% more in the early legalizing or reforming states.[3]
  • When compared to the mean abortion rate of the 12 states where New York is most likely to be the location of legal abortion in the years prior to Roe, this is a reduction of 12.2% (102,837).[3]
  • For instance, it is uncertain if abortion rates would decrease if the number of abortion facilities in New York suddenly dropped by, say, 25%.[3]
  • Black women accounted for 38% of abortions in the 30 locations where racial and ethnic data were available, while white women accounted for 33% and Hispanic women accounted for 21%.[9]
  • Estimates for 12% of abortions were used in 2020, the most recent year for which statistics on the number of abortions in the U.S. were made available.[1]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data show that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased by 51% (30) and the study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[4]
  • The abortion rate in the U.S. grew by 7% from 13.5 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44 in 20.1 to 14.4 in 2020.[9]
  • If there were fewer than 20 abortions or births, fewer than 1,000 women in the category, or if over 15% of abortions occurred among women of unknown race or ethnicity, rates by race or ethnicity will not be published.[6]
  • Pregnancy rates plummeted by 23%, while abortion rates fell by 34% in North Dakota, where decreases in both rates were more stable.[6]
  • The pregnancy rate in Nevada declined by 9% in 1990 compared with 1980, but the abortion rate decreased by much over 43%. Nevada’s birth rate increased by 25%.[6]
  • 1,344 women, or 58% of them, in the state, are opposed or very hostile to abortion rights.[10]
  • The fall in abortion rates was greater than the decline in birth rates in 25 of the 31 locations where both birth and abortion rates fell.[2]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. 33% hospitals, and 16% private doctors’ offices.[8]
  • According to recent statistics, the teenage birth rate climbed by approximately 20% between 1986 and 1990, whereas the ratio of teenage abortions to live births declined by around 21% over the same time.[6]
  • A 20% reduction in clinics from 2014 was reported when there were nine establishments offering abortions, of which five were clinics.[8]
  • In this study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[4]
  • Although the organization claims that 84% of abortions tallied in the most recent effort were based on direct information from healthcare institutions, it contains some guesses and does not account for self.[9]
  • They found the greatest abortion rates in the age groups 20-24 and 25-29, with 19.0 and 18.6 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively, and the highest percentages of abortions (27.6% and 29.3%, respectively).[4]
  • The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age had restricted access to abortion.[11]
  • Contrarily, compared to 6.8%-7.5% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[4]
  • In these 35 locations, the rate of early medical abortion grew by 10% between 2018 and 2019, from 37.5% to 41.1%, and by 12.3% between 2010 and 2019, from 18.4% to 41.1%.[4]
  • However, after 1972, they can only assess whether nonresident abortions in New York were less likely to occur and not whether the increased accessibility of abortion services in the area led to an increase in resident abortion rates.[3]
  • However, further technological developments, such as enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy testing, have made it possible to execute extremely early surgical abortions with success rates surpassing 97%.[4]
  • Three states that accounted for 15% of the United States’ childbearing women do not report any abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.[12]
  • At 14-20 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10%, carried abortion.[4]
  • According to both the CDC and Guttmacher, the number of abortions performed annually in the U.S. increased for years after Roe v Wade allowed the operation in 1973, peaking in the late 1980s and early 1990s.[1]
  • 76.2% of non-Hispanic black women in 29 reporting regions had abortions at 9 weeks of pregnancy, compared to 80.6%-82.4% of women in other racial and ethnic groupings.[4]
  • For every hundred miles away from the state, the number of abortions done in New York among inhabitants of the northern and middle states decreased by 12.2% in 1971–1972.[3]
  • Women around 183 miles from New York saw a 12.2% reduction in abortion rates when their distance from the city increased by 100 miles, but those who lived 830 miles away experienced a 33% decline.[3]
  • The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion rights research and policy group, predicted that 26 states were definitely or likely to outlaw abortion once Roe was overturned.[9]
  • Between 2010 and 2019, the CDC received continuous data from locations where the abortion rate was tracked, and the overall rate fell by 21%.[9]
  • According to Guttmacher statistics, 930,160 abortions occurred in the U.S. in 2020, an increase of 1% over 2019.[9]
  • For instance, data from the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, which was the forerunner of the Department of Health and Human Services, show that there were 235 abortion-related fatalities in 1965 and 280 in 1963.[1]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, the District of Columbia’s abortion rate dropped by 8%, from 32.7 to 30.2 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[8]
  • Around 19% of all abortions in the United States were done in these states in 2017, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Guttmacher Institute’s nationwide survey of abortion.[4]
  • From 1995 to 1997, there were 27% fewer abortions nationwide, and the abortion rate fell from 26.6 per 1,000 in 19.9 to 24.6 in 1997.[2]
  • According to the most recent study, 61% of U.S. citizens believe that abortion should be permitted always or most of the time, while 37% believe the opposite.[1]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the United States in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[8]
  • According to information from the Guttmacher Institute, there are ten states with the highest abortion rates in 2020.[9]
  • According to research done in the United States in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[4]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[8]
  • The 49-state sample’s reduction in abortions per 100 miles analyzed at the mean distance is -0.28 per 1,000 women, a 6.6% decrease at a mean abortion rate of 4.16.[3]
  • In the District of Columbia, it was anticipated in 2020 that 51.5% of pregnancies ended in abortion.[7]
  • Pregnancy and abortion rates for white teens between the ages of 15 and 19 were often more likely to decrease, however, this was not the case for black women.[6]
  • However, according to agency statistics, women between the ages of 20 and 29 handled about 57% of abortions in 2019.[9]
  • Some 38% of reproductive-age women in those counties would have had to travel elsewhere to get an abortion. One-third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[8]
  • Contrarily, adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2 and 3.7%, respectively.[4]
  • The overall number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions hit record lows in 2017, and then all indicators saw rises between 2017 and 2018 of 1% to 2%.[4]
  • During those years, there were 16% more abortion clinics in the northeast and 4% more in the west.[1]
  • There were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[8]
  • Among the 43 areas that reported gestational age at the time of abortion for 2019, 79.3% of abortions were performed at 9 weeks gestation and nearly 92.7% at 13 weeks gestation.[4]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three-quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[4]
  • Abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy varied very little by race and ethnicity, with 78% of non-Hispanic black women having abortions as opposed to 61%-77% of women from other racial and ethnic groups.[4]
  • For instance, compared to the mean abortion rate of 13.9, the abortion rate among non-whites decreased by 2.1 abortions per 1,000 women or 15.1%.[3]
  • Adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2 and 3.7%, respectively.[4]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[4]
  • In the study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[4]
  • Compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[4]
  • According to research done in the united states in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to end the pregnancy.[4]
  • Most abortions occurred at 9 weeks of gestation in each category for the parameters.[4]
  • The categories of changes in rates from 1980 to 1990 are based on rounded numbers results for birth and abortion rates by age group.[6]
  • New statistics from the Alan Guttmacher Institute show that declines in abortion also occurred in 2000 across all racial and ethnic groupings and in every state.[13]

District Of Columbia Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • Between 1986 and 1990, the Hispanic adolescent population rose by 12%, while the non-hispanic white teenage population fell by 10%.[6]
  • According to estimates, 95% of adolescent pregnancies are unplanned, meaning they happen sooner than expected or are never sought.[6]
  • According to a study conducted by experts at the Guttmacher Institute, it reduced fewer adolescent pregnancies between 1988 and 1995 by around 25% owing to lower sexual activity and by about 75% because of more effective contraception use.[13]
  • Therefore, based on a mean distance of 52.1 in hundreds of miles (1.44*5.21) and an expected shift in adolescent birth rates of 7.5 per 1,000 women of 15-19 ages in 1970–1972.[3]
  • In 2000, 83.6 out of 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19 were pregnant, a 28% decrease from 1990, when the incidence of adolescent pregnancies peaked at 116.9 out of 1,000 girls.[13]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[14]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[15]
  • These wards, which are 93% and 94% respectively African and American, account for more than half of all teenage births in the district, yet only make up around 15% of the city’s female adolescent population.[16]
  • The actual number of adolescent pregnancies decreased by around 14% between 1980 and 1988 as the number of teenage women decreased, although pregnancy rates among U.S. teens did not fall throughout the 1980s and may have grown in recent years.[6]
  • The U.S. birth rate climbed by approximately 20% between 1986 and 1990, showing that more adolescent pregnancies resulted in live births.[5]
  • The wards, which are 93% and 94%, respectively, African and American, account for more than half of all teenage births in the district yet only make up around 15% of the city’s female adolescent population.[16]

District Of Columbia Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • If a pregnancy rate was based on 20 pregnancies, 1,000 teenagers in a group, or 15% of the pregnancies were in mothers of unknown age or race, then the data will be excluded.[2]
  • Pregnancy among teens in the united states has significant emotional and societal consequences; it is believed that 95% of such pregnancies are unplanned, meaning they happen sooner than expected or are never wanted.[6]
  • The women themselves report 62% of all pregnancies in Washington as being unplanned when considering all women, not just teenagers.[14]
  • Birth rates for white teens grew by over 10% in 25 states, declined in 16 states, and were unchanged in DC.[6]
  • Birth rates by state for younger teenagers aged 15-17 years were also more likely to increase in 23 states and DC than to decline in nine states.[6]
  • Between 1990 and 2000, the birth rate for black teens aged 15 to 19 fell by 32% to 153 per 1,000, whereas for white teenagers, the rate fell by 28% to 71 per 1,000.[13]
  • The youth percentage of high school pupils’ teen births per 1,000 females aged 15-19 is 86%, due to dual contraceptive nonuse.[15]

District Of Columbia Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • 13 states had a rise in pregnancy rates during the last decade, and six of those states saw increases of over 10%.[6]
  • Twelve states had large increases in pregnancy rates over the decade, and six of those states saw rises of at least 10%.[5]
  • 6% more deliveries were placed between 14 and 20 weeks of pregnancy, and 1% occurred at 21 weeks or more.[1]
  • The pregnancy rate decreased between 1995 and 1997 by 11.3% among girls under the age of 15, 10.7% among females between the ages of 15 and 17, and 58% among females between the ages of 18 and 19.[2]
  • From 1995 to 1997 among females aged 15-19 years, the national number of pregnancies declined by 31% and the national pregnancy rate declined by 78% from 98.3 per 10.0 in 19.9 to 90.7 in 1997.[2]

District Of Columbia Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • In 1988, Hispanic and black women were less likely to use contraception during their first reported premarital sexual intercourse than were white women 32% and 58% versus 70%.[5]
  • The expected drop in births, however, is 374,000 if we assume that each birth resulted in 0.30 births based on the ratio of the two reduced form estimates.[3]
  • In 1973, DC and the 41 states that gave this data had a matching figure of 21%, and in 1974, DC and the 43 states that submitted data had a comparable figure of 11%.[1]
  • If all births are delayed until the woman was at least 20 years old, they predict that $48.1 billion of this total may have been avoided.[6]
  • In the proportion of recent live birthing mothers, 76.3% of youths were smoking and tobacco users.[15]
  • Age or race-related rates of 15% of the population based on known distributions will not be reported.[6]
  • According to estimates, there were 521,626 births and 1 million pregnancies among U.S. women aged 15 to 19 in 1990.[5]

Also Read

How Useful is District of Columbia Abortion

For those who support abortion rights, the District of Columbia’s laws are seen as essential in protecting women’s reproductive autonomy. By allowing women to make their own choices about their bodies and their futures, the District of Columbia ensures that women are not forced to endure unwanted pregnancies or dangerous, back-alley procedures. For these individuals, the District of Columbia’s abortion laws are both necessary and just, providing a safe and legal option for women in need.

On the other hand, opponents of abortion argue that the District of Columbia’s permissive laws only serve to devalue the sanctity of life. They believe that every life, no matter how small or undeveloped, should be protected and respected. By allowing unrestricted access to abortion, the District of Columbia is seen as condoning the destruction of innocent life in the pursuit of convenience or personal choice.

Despite these polarizing views, it is important to consider the actual usefulness of the District of Columbia’s abortion laws in practice. For many women in the District, access to safe and legal abortion services can be life-saving. In cases of rape, incest, or medical complications, a woman’s ability to make decisions about her own body can be a matter of life or death. By providing this option, the District of Columbia affirms a woman’s right to bodily autonomy and self-determination.

Moreover, the District of Columbia’s abortion laws also help to address systemic inequalities in access to healthcare. For low-income women, women of color, and other marginalized communities, access to reproductive healthcare can be limited or non-existent. The District of Columbia’s abortion laws help to level the playing field, ensuring that all women, regardless of their background or circumstances, have access to the care they need.

Of course, there are valid concerns about the ethical and moral implications of abortion, and these should not be ignored. It is important to recognize and respect the deeply held convictions of those who believe that abortion is wrong. However, it is also important to consider the practical implications of restricting access to abortion. Without safe and legal options, women may be forced to turn to dangerous and unregulated procedures, putting their health and well-being at risk.

In the end, the usefulness of the District of Columbia’s abortion laws lies in their ability to protect women’s health, safety, and autonomy. While the debate around abortion will likely continue for years to come, it is essential that we remember the real-world impact of these laws on the lives of women in the District and beyond. As we continue to navigate this complex and emotional issue, we must strive to find common ground and solutions that respect the rights and dignity of all individuals involved.


  1. pewresearch – https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/06/24/what-the-data-says-about-abortion-in-the-u-s-2/
  2. cdc – https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4927a1.htm
  3. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791164/
  4. cdc – https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/ss/ss7009a1.htm
  5. cdc – https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00021930.htm
  6. cdc – https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/m0031562/m0031562.asp
  7. abort73 – https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/district_of_columbia/
  8. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-district-columbia
  9. usnews – https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/slideshows/states-with-the-highest-abortion-rates
  10. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/geography/northern-america/united-states/district-columbia
  11. politico – https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/03/bortion-statistics-by-state-map-00029740
  12. congress – https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/581/text?r=5&s=1
  13. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2004/us-teenage-pregnancy-rate-drops-10th-straight-year
  14. powertodecide – https://powertodecide.org/what-we-do/information/national-state-data/washington-dc
  15. americashealthrankings – https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/health-of-women-and-children/measure/TeenBirth_MCH/state/DC
  16. prb – https://www.prb.org/resources/dcs-teenage-moms-need-their-own-moms/
  17. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_District_of_Columbia
  18. worldpopulationreview – https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/abortion-rates-by-state

Leave a Comment