Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) Statistics 2023: Facts about Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast), and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 16 Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) Statistics on this page 🙂

Dynamic Application Security Testing (Dast) “Latest” Statistics

  • The tool cannot test 10% of the application’s source code before the application itself since it uses a dynamic testing methodology.[1]
  • In a copyrighted report published in March 2012 by security vendor Cenzic, the most common application vulnerabilities in recently tested applications include: Cross-site scripting (37%), SQL injection (16%), and many more.[1]
  • A 2013 Microsoft security survey found that over 40% of software developers worldwide claimed that security wasn’t a key concern for them, and that 76% of US developers don’t employ a secure application.[2]
  • Analyzing and testing vulnerabilities vulnerabilities in security inconsistencies and flaws in software are prevalent. 84% of software attacks take use of flaws in the application layer.[2]
  • According to the company, between February 2015 and June 2019, 216 such “next-generation” supply chain attacks were reported, but from July 2019 to May 2020 an additional 929 attacks were documented, so this has become a very popular attack vector.[3]
  • In ESG’s poll, over 50% of participants said that open source components make up over 50% of their code base, while 8% claimed that this percentage is closer to two thirds.[3]
  • Applications had an average of 38 known vulnerabilities that were inherited from those open source components, although 11% of those components had at least one vulnerability.[3]
  • In 28% of firms, the development manager and a security analyst jointly make the choice; in 24% of organizations, the development manager acts alone; and in 21% of organizations, a security analyst acts alone.[3]
  • Less than half of developers are required to complete formal security training in a third of firms, while all developers are only obliged to complete such training in 15% of organizations.[3]
  • In the Java ecosystem, developers downloaded 226 billion open-source software components from the Maven Central Repository in 2019, which was a 55% increase compared to 2018.[3]
  • 66% of NPM package vulnerabilities remain unpatched and that over 40% of all NPM packages include or rely on code that has known vulnerabilities, according to research from the University of Darmstadt that was released in 2019.[3]
  • Less than half of firms mandate regular formal security training for developers, with 16% expecting them to educate themselves and 20% only providing it when a developer first joins the company.[3]
  • Only 40% of organizations track security issue introduction and continuous improvement metrics for development teams or individual developers.[3]
  • In the last 12 months, 60% of respondents acknowledged that vulnerabilities in their production apps had been exploited.[3]
  • Meeting a crucial deadline, low risk vulnerabilities, or problems being identified too late in the release cycle were the most often mentioned justifications, each being given 45% of the time.[3]
  • Due to this, just 19% of firms explicitly assign the responsibility for application security testing to individual developers, while 26% do so to development managers.[3]

Also Read

Reference

  1. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_application_security_testing
  2. cmu – https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/blog/10-types-of-application-security-testing-tools-when-and-how-to-use-them/
  3. csoonline – https://www.csoonline.com/article/3571268/the-state-of-application-security-what-the-statistics-tell-us.html

Leave a Comment