Insurance Claims Management Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Insurance Claims Management Statistics 2023: Facts about Insurance Claims Management outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Insurance Claims Management, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Insurance Claims Management Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Insurance Claims Management Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 34 Insurance Claims Management Statistics on this page 🙂

Insurance Claims Management “Latest” Statistics

  • Every 12 months of evaluations, VBA’s quality assurance method should provide accurate estimates with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level.[1]
  • The median pay is the wage estimate at the 50th percentile, meaning that 50% of employees earn less than the median and 50% of workers earn more than the median.[2]
  • With 95,184 claims, Bay County had the most claims recorded, making up over 60% of all claims made because of Hurricane Michael.[3]
  • In reality, obtaining the information needed to do their task takes knowledge workers 30% of their time.[4]
  • A 2020 Triple-I Consumer survey found that a record high 27% of homeowners claimed they had flood insurance, which is higher than NFIP forecasts.[5]
  • For procedures that required no prior permission or referral, around 10% of rejections were made. 16% were for prohibited services. 2% were because of medical necessity, and 72% were for other reasons.[6]
  • And a 2018 investigation by the HHS Inspector General found that medicare advantage plans, which are also governed by CMS, typically rejected 8% of claims.[6]
  • In contrast, a survey by FAIR Health on mental health trends in private insurance found that behavioral health diagnoses made up 2.7% of all medical claim lines in 2017.[6]
  • In contrast, insurers reported an average in-network claims rejection rate for their individual market plans of 14% in 2018, 17.4% in 2019, and 18.3% in 2020.[6]
  • Three issuers with the greatest market shares in Florida, where the average rejection rate in 2020 was 15%, reported denial rates of 10.5% for Florida BCBS, 11.1% for Health Options, and 27.9% for Celtic Insurance.[6]
  • Although 2% of all claims refused by plans were declined because of medical necessity, certain plans with huge numbers of denied claims—75,000 or more—reported considerably higher proportions.[6]
  • 20% of the estimated 765,000 medical necessity rejections for treatments in 2020 were for mental health care.[6]
  • Consumers using in 2020 challenged little over 1% of in-network rejections, and 63% of those appeals were upheld by insurers.[6]
  • Less than 10% of 144 reported issuers, or 28 of them, had denial rates. Between 10% and 19% of in-network claims were rejected by 52 issuers. 28 issuers declined over 30% of in-network claims, while 36 issuers denied over 20-30%.[6]
  • Less than 1% to over 80% were among the broad ranges of insurer rejection rates.[6]
  • Fewer than 4% of claims filed to commercial insurers, most of which were claims to big group health plans, were denied.[6]
  • 72% of plan-reported rejections were categorized as having no particular cause and all other reasons.[6]
  • About 16% of claims that were rejected for reasons other than being out of network were rejected because the claim was for an excluded service. 10% because there was no pre-authorization or referral, and just 2% because it was necessary for medical reasons.[6]
  • Nearly one in five insurers indicate that they have rejected over 30% of in-network claims, with the average being over 18%.[6]
  • Bronze QHPs will typically deny 15.9% of in-network claims in 2020, compared to 16.2% for gold, 18.9% for silver, 11.8% for platinum, and 18.3% for catastrophic plans.[6]
  • The combined individual and small group market’s average claims rejection rate for in-network and out-of-network claims in 2018, 2019 and 2020 was 16.9%, 14.5%, and 15.3%, respectively.[6]
  • Among insurers with comprehensive data, 20% of in-network claims were refused, or roughly 18% of the total.[6]
  • The average healthcare expense per person grew globally between 2007 and 2017 at a compound annual growth rate of over 4%.[7]
  • Certain payers may reduce medical expenses by as much as 10% to 20% by using a digital solution, such as advanced analytics, to prioritize invoices for auditing or identify patients who are likely to submit high-cost claims in the future.[7]
  • After removing contracts with unfulfilled obligations, the entire range of utilization rose to 78%-83%.[8]
  • About 10% of all enrollments each year were under contracts with less than 10 participants, and these contracts were deemed full regardless of use.[8]
  • Approximately 6% of an insurance provider’s outpatient claims for batched visits made up 3% of all claims.[8]
  • The yearly usage rates, according to a preliminary estimate, varied from 67.3% in 1997 to 71% in 2002.[8]
  • With the permissible amounts technique, very few claims were missed in 2002. 96% of all outpatient traditional provider visits were permitted.[8]
  • A contract was only deemed incomplete if usage was lower than 50% and there were at least 10 enrollees.[8]
  • From 1.6% of claims for traditional providers to 26% of claims for CAM providers, this was the case.[8]
  • 50% use of contracts with at least 10 enrollees is required to create a plan to harmonize variable categorization coding demographic information.[8]
  • Conventional physicians earned 63% of the mean billed to the authorized amount for five typical operations.[8]
  • A 1% reduction in the loss ratio for a $1 billion insurer would increase profits by more than $7 million.[9]

Also Read

How Useful is Insurance Claims Management

One of the key benefits of insurance claims management is the expertise and support it provides to policyholders. Navigating the complex world of insurance policies and claim procedures can be overwhelming for many individuals who are already dealing with the stress of a loss. Insurance claims managers are there to guide policyholders through the entire claims process, from filing the claim to negotiating settlements with the insurance company. Their knowledge and experience in handling insurance claims can be invaluable in ensuring that policyholders receive fair and timely compensation for their losses.

Insurance claims management also helps to expedite the claims process, ensuring that policyholders receive the support they need as quickly as possible. Time is of the essence when it comes to recovering from a loss, whether it be a car accident, a natural disaster, or a theft. With the help of insurance claims managers, policyholders can rest assured that their claims are being processed efficiently and effectively, minimizing the financial and emotional impact of the loss.

Moreover, insurance claims management can help policyholders avoid potential pitfalls and roadblocks that may arise during the claims process. Insurance companies are notorious for employing tactics to minimize payouts and delay settlements, leaving policyholders frustrated and disheartened. With the assistance of insurance claims managers, policyholders can level the playing field and ensure that their rights are protected throughout the claims process. From handling paperwork and documentation to negotiating with insurance adjusters, insurance claims managers are there to advocate on behalf of policyholders and help them navigate the often-confusing world of insurance.

In conclusion, insurance claims management is a valuable resource for policyholders who find themselves in need of support during challenging times. Whether it be a minor fender-bender or a catastrophic event, insurance claims managers are there to guide policyholders through the claims process, expedite settlements, and advocate on their behalf. By providing expertise, support, and advocacy, insurance claims management plays a crucial role in helping policyholders recover and move forward from unexpected losses.


  1. va –
  2. bls –
  3. floir –
  4. ibm –
  5. iii –
  6. kff –
  7. mckinsey –
  8. nih –
  9. sas –

Leave a Comment