Kentucky Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Kentucky Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Kentucky reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Kentucky Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Kentucky LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Kentucky Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Kentucky Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 49 Kentucky Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Kentucky Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • Opinions on abortion parents and non-parents legal sample size in almost all situations 20% and 80%.[1]
  • As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[2]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[2]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[3]
  • In 2017, there were two planned parenthood clinics in a state with 996488 women aged 15-49, neither of which provided abortion services. In that year, 74% of women in the state aged 15-44 resided in a county without an abortion clinic.[4]
  • The abortion rate in Kentucky in 2020, according to the Charlotte Lozier Institute, was 4.8 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age, which is far lower than the national average but up 16% from 2019.[5]
  • Women who claimed having never had an abortion received 65% of the prescriptions. 23% were on women with one previous abortion and 12% were on women with over one prior abortion.[5]
  • State law requires doctors who perform abortions to document two things first, if the pregnancy termination gave the unborn child the greatest chance of surviving, and second, whether the abortion was judged medically necessary.[6]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the United States in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[2]
  • In Kentucky, 4% of abortions occurred between weeks four and five of pregnancy, rising to 28% by week six.[5]
  • Some 38% of reproductive-age women lived in those counties and would have had to travel elsewhere to get an abortion. One-third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[2]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, out-of-state residents received 17.5% of the abortions carried out in Kentucky.[7]
  • Colorado reduced births and abortions between 2009 and 2014 by roughly 50% among teenagers and 20% among women between 20 and 24 with the aid of a private funder, saving the state close to 70 million in public support.[8]
  • There was a 50% decrease in clinics since 2014 when there were three institutions offering abortions, of which two were clinic.[2]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, Kentucky’s abortion rate decreased by 9%, from 4.1 to 3.8 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[2]
  • States passed 48.3 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[2]
  • The Guttmacher Institute reports that there were 926,240 abortions performed in the united states in 2014.[9]
  • At 20 weeks of gestation, there were 43 abortions (1% ), while at 21 weeks and later, there were 35 abortions (not nearly 1%).[5]
  • In Kentucky, 57% of respondents agreed that abortion should be prohibited in all or most situations.[4]

Kentucky Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[10]
  • Because of their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 4.8 per 1,000 women.[10]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[3]
  • The state’s rural adolescent birth rate decreased by 33% or 60 per 1,000 in 2007 to 40.9 per 1,000 in 2015.[11]
  • In Kentucky, the adolescent birth rate in urban counties fell by 44% between 2007 and 2015, to 26.4 births per 1,000 females.[11]
  • While Asian adolescents had the lowest teen birth rate among racial or ethnic groups at 3 births per 1,000, a 15% decrease from 2019, the rate among Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islanders fell by 14% to 22.6 per 1000.[12]
  • With 25.7 births per 1,000, American, Indian or Alaska Native women and girls had the highest adolescent birth rate among racial or ethnic groups in 2020, a 12% decrease from 2019.[12]
  • According to a survey by various organizations, including the Appalachian regional commission, the adolescent birth rate in Appalachian Kentucky is 34% higher than the rest of the state and 68% higher than the national average.[8]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[13]
  • According to the national campaign to prevent adolescent and unplanned pregnancy, Kentucky still ranks ninth among states with high rates of teen pregnancies, despite this drop.[14]

Kentucky Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • The teen birth rate in Kentucky was 23.8 per 1,000. Kentucky’s teen birth rate in 2020 was essentially unchanged from its rate of 24.9 in 2019, according to CDC researchers.[12]
  • This was a 7% decrease from 2016 and another record low for U.S. teenagers. Birth rates fell 10% for women aged 1517 years and 6% for women aged 18-19 years.[15]

Kentucky Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • Teen births in the U.S. fell by 47.6% in urban counties and by 37.1% in rural ones during that time, both of which trailed behind the national declines.[11]
  • Teen birth rates decreased by the state in 2020, with Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Montana seeing the largest decreases (19% in Montana).[12]
  • In Kentucky, 47% of pregnancies are unplanned, costing the state and the federal governments a combined $75 million and almost 303 million annually.[8]
  • Teen birth rates decreased by 50% nationwide in big metropolitan counties between 2007 and 2015, to 18.9 births per 1,000.[11]
  • Women with one previous live birth were subject to 27%, while those with two or more births were subject to 40%.[5]
  • The state’s infant mortality rate in 2017 was 65 deaths for every 1,000 live births.[4]
  • 47% of all pregnancies in Kentucky, including those of minors, are deemed unplanned by the women themselves.[3]
  • Public funds are used to support 67% of unwanted pregnancies, with the cost of each birth through the first year of life estimated to be $14,887.[14]
  • In Kentucky, the percentage of low-birthweight infants grew slightly from 87% in 2012–14 to 88% in 2017–19.[16]
  • Religious customs of almost always legal, most of the time illegal, and not sure samples were taken protestant evangelical 28%, 68%, and 4%, respectively.[1]
  • Only 37% of Kentucky children in foster care reunite with their parent or primary caregiver, according to the most current statistics, a decrease from about five years ago.[16]
  • Between weeks 11 and 12, 7% of pregnancies occurred, followed by 6% between weeks 13 and 15, and 5% between weeks 16 and 19.[5]
  • The study examined the percentage of public school children who were homeless (3%), kids with customized education plans (16%).[16]
  • In Kentucky, 16.7% of infants were delivered to mothers who admitted to smoking while pregnant in 2017, a decrease from 19.8% in 2012.[16]

Also Read

How Useful is Kentucky Abortion

One argument in favor of the new abortion laws is that they protect the rights of the unborn and uphold the sanctity of life. Proponents of the laws believe that every life, no matter how small, deserves to be protected and cherished. By restricting access to abortion, they argue that the government is upholding its duty to protect the most vulnerable members of society.

On the other hand, critics argue that the new abortion laws in Kentucky do more harm than good. They point to the negative impact these laws could have on women’s health and well-being. By limiting access to safe and legal abortion services, these laws could force women to seek out dangerous and potentially life-threatening alternatives. This not only puts women at risk but also undermines their autonomy and right to make decisions about their own bodies.

Another argument against the new abortion laws is that they disproportionately affect low-income women and women of color. By restricting access to abortion, these laws could further exacerbate existing inequalities and barriers to healthcare. Women who are already marginalized and underserved could face even greater difficulties in accessing the reproductive healthcare services they need.

In addition, the new abortion laws in Kentucky could have a chilling effect on women’s reproductive rights more broadly. By setting a precedent for restricting access to abortion, these laws could embolden other states to follow suit. This could create a domino effect that significantly limits women’s rights and freedoms across the country.

It is essential to consider the broader implications of these new abortion laws in Kentucky. While the intention may be to protect the rights of the unborn, the reality is that these laws could have far-reaching negative consequences on women’s health, autonomy, and well-being. It is crucial that we take a comprehensive and compassionate approach to this issue, one that prioritizes the dignity and agency of all individuals involved.

Ultimately, the usefulness of the new abortion laws in Kentucky is a matter of perspective. While some may see them as necessary measures to protect the sanctity of life, others view them as harmful restrictions that undermine women’s rights and freedoms. It is essential that we engage in thoughtful and respectful dialogue to find common ground and solutions that prioritize the well-being and autonomy of all individuals.


  1. pewresearch –
  2. guttmacher –
  3. powertodecide –
  4. wikipedia –
  5. lozierinstitute –
  6. thetimestribune –
  7. abort73 –
  8. cnn –
  9. worldpopulationreview –
  10. worldpopulationreview –
  11. uky –
  12. usnews –
  13. americashealthrankings –
  14. plannedparenthood –
  15. somerset-kentucky –
  16. nkytribune –

Leave a Comment