Massachusetts Abortion Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Massachusetts Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Massachusetts reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.

massachusetts

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Massachusetts Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Massachusetts LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Massachusetts Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Massachusetts Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 90 Massachusetts Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Massachusetts Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age resided in states that restrict access to abortion.[1]
  • The overall number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions hit record lows in 2017, and then all indicators saw rises between 2017 and 2018 of 1% to 2%.[2]
  • The proportion of abortions conducted at 13 weeks gestation increased a little from 91.9% to 92% among the 34 reporting locations that reported data on gestational age per year for 2010–2019.[2]
  • Abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy varied very little by race and ethnicity, with 78% of non-Hispanic black women having abortions as opposed to 61%-77% of women from other racial and ethnic groups.[2]
  • Similarly, the discovery of early medical abortion regimens has made it possible to execute abortions at an early stage of pregnancy. Completion rates for these regimens, which include mifepristone and misoprostol, have reached 96%-98%.[2]
  • Seventy-one abortions in Massachusetts were carried out at eight weeks or earlier, and a fifth took place between nine and 12 weeks.[3]
  • From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of all abortions by early medical abortion climbed by 12.3% among regions that reported by technique type and included medical abortion in their reporting form.[2]
  • The age categories had a decline in abortion rates from 2010 to 2019, although teenagers experienced the largest declines—by 60% and 50%, respectively—among all older age groups.[2]
  • In Massachusetts, it was expected that 20.4% of pregnancies ended in abortion in 2020.[4]
  • For these 48 reporting locations, the percentage change in abortion measures from the most recent past year 2018 to 2019 and for the 10 years of study 2010 to 2019 were computed.[2]
  • Contrarily, adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2 and 3.7%, respectively.[2]
  • These abortions, which totaled 625,346, were from 48 reporting locations that submitted data yearly between 2010 and 2019.[2]
  • According to the statistics, we estimate that 60% of all abortions performed on minors in Massachusetts throughout the research are included in the planned parenthood league of Massachusetts cohort under consideration.[5]
  • Although the risk of dying during an abortion is modest in absolute terms, mortality rises exponentially by 38% for every extra week of pregnancy.[5]
  • In the 43 regions that provided information on gestational age at the time of abortion for 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out at 9 weeks, and almost all (92.7%).[2]
  • Around 19% of all abortions in the united states were done in these states in 2017, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Guttmacher Institute’s nationwide survey of abortion.[2]
  • In three of the cases, the number of past abortions was not disclosed, and in ten of the cases, the number of prior live births was not disclosed.[3]
  • For 17% of abortions, the race/ethnicity question was left blank or refused to be answered.[5]
  • In the 42 districts where data on marital status was given for 2019, 14.5% of women who had abortions were married and 85.5 % were single. Table 7.[2]
  • When judicial bypass abortions were compared to parental permission abortions in the adjusted analysis table table44, the probabilities of being ineligible for medication abortion were considerably higher.[5]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, Massachusetts’s abortion rate dropped by 12%, from 15.3 to 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[6]
  • In this study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[2]
  • Compared to women who had one live birth, and those who had over one, 42% of abortions were done on women who had never given birth to a living child.[3]
  • The number of abortions rose by 2% from 2018 to 2019. The abortion rate increased by 0.9% and the abortion ratio increased by 3%.[2]
  • At 14-20 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10% fewer abortions.[2]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data show that the birth rate for adolescents aged 1519 years decreased by 51%. The study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[2]
  • However, further technological developments, such as enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy testing, have made it possible to execute extremely early surgical abortions with success rates surpassing 97%.[2]
  • In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out during 9 weeks gestation, and 92.7% were carried out at 13 weeks.[2]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 34% of the abortions carried out in Massachusetts were on people who lived outside the state.[4]
  • At 7-9 weeks of gestation, 52.2% of abortions were surgical. 93.2% of abortions during 10-13 weeks of pregnancy 96.9%-99.2% of abortions at 14-20 weeks of pregnancy and 87.0% at 21 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • According to research done in the United States in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[2]
  • 76.2% of non-Hispanic black women in 29 reporting regions had abortions at 9 weeks of pregnancy, compared to 80.6%-82.4% of women in other racial and ethnic groupings.[2]
  • 12% of the judicial bypass group and 9% of the parental permission group reported having had an abortion in the past.[5]
  • A percentage based on 539,573 abortions was reported overall from the regions that complied with the requirements for reporting the quantity of prior induced abortions.[2]
  • Between 13 and 18 weeks of gestation, there were 7% of recorded abortions, and between 19 and 23 weeks, there were 2% of reported abortions.[3]
  • Except for 6 weeks gestation, surgical abortion accounted for the highest proportion of abortions among the 42 locations that reported them for 2019, broken down by specific weeks of pregnancy and procedure type.[2]
  • In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. 1 one third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[6]
  • According to the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the abortion rate in Massachusetts in 2019 was 13.3 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, which is 2% higher than the rate in 2018.[3]
  • Most abortions occurred at 9 weeks gestation in each category for these parameters.[2]
  • In these 35 locations, the rate of early medical abortion grew by 10% between 2018 and 2019, from 37.5% to 41.1%, and by 12.3% between 2010 and 2019, from 18.4% to 41.1%.[2]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[6]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the united states in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[6]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[6]
  • 33 records from the original cohort were removed from the analysis because either the minor continued the pregnancy after initially seeking an abortion (n = 22.11%) or they were lost to follow-up (n = 10.05%).[5]
  • There was a 36% rise in clinics from 2014 when there were 14 clinics among the total of 43 abortions.[6]
  • The proportion of abortions carried out at 13 weeks of gestation remained low during 2010–2019 at 90%.[2]
  • As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[6]
  • In the studied population, there were 1,559 abortions carried out with parental agreement at a rate of 77%, and 467 (23%).[5]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three-quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[2]
  • The total number of recorded abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio declined by 18% (from 762,755) between 2010 and 2019. 21% from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years and 13% from 22.5 abortions per 1,000 live births, respectively.[2]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[7]
  • 56% of all abortions recorded in Massachusetts and 68% of abortions carried out in clinics were conducted at one of planned parenthood’s three abortion facilities.[3]
  • Women with one prior abortion underwent 26% of procedures, whereas women with two or more prior abortions had 20% of procedures.[3]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data indicate that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased by 51% 30 and that this study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[2]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68% 75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[2]

Massachusetts Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • In one year, the adolescent pregnancy rate in Massachusetts decreased by 14% to 12 births per 1,000 women.[8]
  • For instance, Massachusetts has had a 59% fall in its adolescent birth rate since 2010, going from 17 to only 7 per 1,000.[10]
  • According to recently published statistics, the number of adolescent pregnancies in Massachusetts fell for the sixth consecutive year in 2016, but the rate is still high in places like Haverhill, Lawrence, and Lynn.[11]
  • Because of their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 4.8 per 1,000 women.[9]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[12]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[7]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[9]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in west Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[9]
  • Healthy futures program and adolescent sexual behaviors in Massachusetts, 2011–2015 estimated effects using data from the immediate eighth-grade follow-up and 1-year follow-up ninth-grade survey.[14]

Massachusetts Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • 47% of all pregnancies in Massachusetts, not only among teenagers, are deemed unplanned by the women themselves.[7]
  • Between 2013 and 2019, the number of teen births fell by 42%, from 11.9 to 6.9 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19. Drug deaths increased by 21% from 232 to 281 deaths per 100,000 women ages 20-44 between 2014-2016 and 2017.[12]
  • According to preliminary statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics published in December, birth rates for teens aged 15 to 17 increased by 3% in 2006, the first rise since 1991.[13]

Massachusetts Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • HIV-related risky behaviors in women percentage of women ages 18-44. 0.2%-3.1% of women who recently gave birth to a living child had an unintended pregnancy 23.8% of women’s health sleep.[12]

Massachusetts Abortion “Gestation” Statistics

  • 19% of the variables for the patient reported gestational age during the initial phone contact were missing values.[5]

Massachusetts Abortion “Maternity” Statistics

  • First singleton term vertex births via cesarean section 24.8% or 27 maternity procedures rating survey on maternal practices in infant and nutritional care.[12]

Massachusetts Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • There was a 50% chance that each school would belong to the treatment group or the control group.[14]
  • With a failure rate of fewer than 1%, LARCs, which include IUDs and hormonal implants, are among the most effective birth control options.[8]
  • By the eighth grade follow-up, 64% of treatment kids had reported ever having vaginal intercourse, compared to 94% of control students.[14]
  • According to statistics supplied by the executive office of health and human services, 1,931 infants were delivered that year throughout the entire state to women between the ages of 15 and 19.[11]
  • Teens are less likely to have had sex by every age than those born in the 1970s, according to pediatrics research, showing that more young people are deferring sexual beginning than in prior years.[8]
  • Particularly, 29% of girls in the treatment group and 64% of girls in the control group p 04 reported ever engaging in vaginal intercourse.[14]
  • By the eighth-grade follow-up, white non-Hispanics had 13.4% more vaginal sex in the treatment group than in the control group, however, the difference was not statistically significant.[14]
  • According to a new research pdf by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the average age of a woman having her first child is 263—the oldest ever.[8]
  • The proportion of Hispanics who reported ever engaging in vaginal intercourse was 63% in the treatment group and 15.7% in the control group.[14]
  • Among the 45 areas that reported the number of previous live births for 2019 are 40.2%, 24.5%, 20%, 60%, and 92% of women, respectively, who had never given birth to a live child before.[2]
  • By the ninth-grade follow-up after one year, 23% of students in the treatment and control groups had never engaged in vaginal intercourse.[14]
  • In the eighth grade survey of 1,127 pupils, 1,060 students had data on the main outcome of having ever had sex.[14]
  • Classroom observers evaluated implementation quality and student participation, with active participation being defined as participation by 75% to 100% of pupils.[14]
  • Dr. Heywood claims that the failure rate for LARCs is less than 1%, compared to birth control pill failure rates of 10% and condom failure rates of 20%.[8]

Also Read

How Useful is Massachusetts Abortion

One of the most compelling arguments in favor of Massachusetts Abortion is the protection of women’s rights and the ability to control their own bodies. It is crucial for women to have access to safe and legal abortion services to avoid more dangerous, potentially life-threatening alternatives. In a society that values individual freedoms and autonomy, Massachusetts Abortion is one way to ensure that every woman has the choice to make decisions about her own body without facing judgment or legal repercussions.

Furthermore, Massachusetts Abortion can also be seen as a tool for socioeconomic equality. For women who cannot afford or access contraception, unintended pregnancies can have drastic consequences on their lives. By providing access to safe and legal abortion services, Massachusetts Abortion can prevent women from being forced into motherhood when they are not ready or able to support a child. This can help level the playing field and empower women to make choices that are in the best interest of themselves and their families.

On the other hand, opponents of Massachusetts Abortion argue that it goes against their moral or religious beliefs, and that it is equivalent to taking a human life. While these viewpoints are valid and should be respected, it is essential to consider the larger societal implications of restricting access to abortion services. By limiting this right, we risk forcing women into dangerous, illegal procedures that can have long-term physical and emotional consequences. Furthermore, denying women the right to choose can perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality, as women are unable to make decisions about their own bodies and futures.

In conclusion, the usefulness of Massachusetts Abortion should be evaluated through the lens of women’s rights, autonomy, and the larger societal implications of restricting access to this essential service. While the debate around this issue may never come to a full resolution, it is crucial to prioritize the health and well-being of women in our society. Massachusetts Abortion is a controversial but necessary tool for ensuring that every woman has the ability to make decisions about her own body and future.

Reference


  1. politico – https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/03/bortion-statistics-by-state-map-00029740
  2. cdc – https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/ss/ss7009a1.htm
  3. lozierinstitute – https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-massachusetts-2019/
  4. abort73 – https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/massachusetts/
  5. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485490/
  6. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-massachusetts
  7. powertodecide – https://powertodecide.org/what-we-do/information/national-state-data/massachusetts
  8. capecodhealth – https://www.capecodhealth.org/medical-services/womens-health/pregnancy-birth/why-young-women-may-be-waiting-longer-to-become-moms/
  9. worldpopulationreview – https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/teen-pregnancy-rates-by-state
  10. aradvocates – https://www.aradvocates.org/data-arkansas-needs-a-different-strategy-for-preventing-teen-births/
  11. eagletribune – https://www.eagletribune.com/news/haverhill/teen-births-continue-decline-but-disparities-remain/article_7bdb576c-44d6-5faa-b10e-ca256976f517.html
  12. americashealthrankings – https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/health-of-women-and-children/measure/TeenBirth_MCH/state/MA
  13. reuters – https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pregnancy-teens/teen-pregnancy-pact-shocks-massachusetts-city-idUSN1938672620080620
  14. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049460/
  15. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Massachusetts
  16. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25620306/

Leave a Comment