Massachusetts Bar Exam Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Massachusetts Bar Exam Statistics 2023: Facts about Bar Exam in Massachusetts reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Massachusetts Bar Exam, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Massachusetts LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Massachusetts Bar Exam Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Massachusetts Bar Exam Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 16 Massachusetts Bar Exam Statistics on this page 🙂

Massachusetts Bar Exam “Latest” Statistics

  • Statistics released by the Massachusetts Board of Bar examiners on Monday show that just 69.2% of test takers passed the bar exam in July.[1]
  • The passing percentage for the New York bar test, which serves as a decent middle ground standard, is 61% while Massachusetts has a passing percentage of 63.94%.[2]
  • Typically, the pass rates for the Massachusetts bar exam vary from 54% to 86% for all test takers, 69% to 94% for first timers, and 24% to 52% for repeat test takers.[3]
  • A total of 396 examinees sat for the February 2022 Massachusetts bar examination, of whom 43.9% passed. There were 171 first time takers, of whom 62% passed the exam.[3]
  • 162 out of 378 Maryland bar exam test takers in February 2021 has a total passing percentage of 42.9% while the Massachusetts bar exam has an overall passing percentage of 43.4% (204/277).[6]
  • 45 out of 79 Vermont test takers in February 2021 has a total passing percentage of 57% while the Massachusetts bar exam has an overall passing percentage of 43.4% (204/277)[6]
  • In order to pass the Massachusetts bar exam, an examinee needs to score a 270/400 (135 out of 200-point scale).[4]

Massachusetts Bar Exam “Examination” Statistics

  • The Uniform Bar Exam (UBE) is administered twice each year in Massachusetts (in February, and July). The examination is administered over two days, in four, three-hour sessions. The UBE has three parts: the Multistate Bar Exam (MBE), the Multistate Essay Exam (MEE), and the Multistate Performance Test (MPT).[1]
  • A total of 1,377 examinees sat for the July 2019 Massachusetts Bar examination, of whom 985 (71.5%) passed. There were 1151 first time takers, of whom 939 (81.6%) passed the exam.[4]

Massachusetts Bar Exam “Exam” Statistics

  • In February 2022, Massachusetts Bar exam overall pass rate was 44%, 62% first-timers, and 30% repeaters.[1]
  • While 79.8% of test takers succeeded on their first attempt this past summer, the total success percentage for the July 2016 Massachusetts exam administration was 70.8% .[4]
  • 71.5% of test takers who took the exam in July passed, according to information released on Monday by the Massachusetts Bar of Board examiners.[5]
  • The Board of Bar examiners automatically analyzes and regrades the top 15% of the failed applicants’ essay responses after the tests have been assessed but before the dissemination of the grading results.[6]
  • In February 2022 Massachusetts Bar exam, the overall passing rate was 44% with first timer percentage of 62%, and repeater percentage of 30%. The results were posted last April 28, 2022.[4]

Massachusetts Bar Exam “Test” Statistics

  • The passing percentage for first-time test takers in the state has also been steadily declining since 2010, with the exception of what seems to be an outlier in July 2013, when 91.0% of test.[4]

Massachusetts Bar Exam “Other” Statistics

  • The Multistate Bar Exam (“MBE”) counts for 50%. The Multistate Essay Exam (“MEE”) questions count for 30% and the Multistate Performance Test (“MPT”) questions count for 20%.[3]

Also Read

How Useful is Massachusetts Bar Exam

One argument in favor of the Massachusetts Bar Exam is that it ensures lawyers have the foundational knowledge and skills necessary to practice law effectively. The exam covers a wide range of legal topics, from constitutional law to contracts, which are essential for any practicing attorney. By passing the exam, individuals demonstrate that they have the essential legal knowledge required to navigate the complexities of the legal landscape.

Proponents of the exam also argue that it serves as a quality control mechanism, ensuring that only those who meet the state’s high standards are admitted to practice. By setting a high bar for entry into the legal profession, the exam helps to uphold the integrity and professionalism of the field. It also helps to protect the public by ensuring that only qualified and competent individuals are allowed to represent clients in legal matters.

Additionally, the Massachusetts Bar Exam provides a standardized way to evaluate the performance of law school graduates. By testing all candidates on the same material and under the same conditions, the exam helps to level the playing field, ensuring that all individuals are assessed fairly and impartially. This can be particularly important for individuals who may have attended different law schools or followed different paths to entering the legal profession.

However, critics of the Massachusetts Bar Exam argue that the exam may not accurately reflect a candidate’s true abilities as a lawyer. Some argue that the exam places too much emphasis on memorization of legal facts and rules, rather than on practical skills and competencies. In a profession that requires critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and problem-solving skills, some argue that the exam may fall short in evaluating these essential qualities.

Critics also point to the high costs associated with taking the Massachusetts Bar Exam. From study materials to exam fees, preparing for and taking the exam can be a significant financial burden for aspiring lawyers, particularly recent law school graduates who may already be carrying student loan debt. This economic barrier may discourage qualified individuals from pursuing a career in law, limiting the diversity of perspectives and experiences within the legal profession.

Ultimately, the usefulness of the Massachusetts Bar Exam is a complex and multifaceted issue. While the exam serves important purposes in ensuring the quality and professionalism of the legal profession, it is not without its shortcomings. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, it may be worth considering alternative ways to evaluate the competency of new lawyers that better reflect the demands of the profession in the 21st century.


  1. typepad –
  2. lawschooli –
  3. ibarexam –
  4. abovethelaw –
  5. bizjournals –
  6. jdadvising –
  7. adaptibar –
  8. crushendo –
  9. typepad –
  10. mass –
  11. ncbex –
  12. reuters –

Leave a Comment