Media Monitoring Statistics 2024
– Everything You Need to Know


At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Media Monitoring Statistics 2023: Facts about Media Monitoring outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Media Monitoring, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Media Monitoring Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Media Monitoring Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 42 Media Monitoring Statistics on this page 🙂

Media Monitoring “Latest” Statistics

  • Strong sentiment analysis social media indicators, such as projected social media reach or the total number of likes, comments, and shares, are provided by Brand24.[1]
  • According to 63% of social media marketers, listening will be more significant in the approaching year.[2]
  • 73% of marketers think their efforts[ in social media marketing have had a moderate or great impact on their company.[2]
  • Consumers want businesses to reply to social media messages within a day, yet the average brand response rate across all sectors is less than 25%.[2]
  • 96% of dissatisfied clients won’t voice their displeasure to you personally, but they will do it to 15 other people.[2]
  • According to Influencer Marketing Hub, 59% of customers tweet businesses on social media after a positive encounter.[2]
  • Social media engagement from consumers may increase their spending by up to 40% compared to other customers.[2]
  • A study of 200 prominent businesses found that just 51% of them used social monitoring and listening in any form.[2]
  • More than a million individuals read customer service related tweets, and 80% of them are negative.[2]
  • Brands benefit from social monitoring when they raise activity by around 25% and cut response times on social media by 50 minutes.[2]
  • The top four reasons consumers will unfollow a brand on social media are poor quality of product or support (49%), poor customer service (49%), irrelevant content (45%), and too many ads (45%).[2]
  • 71% of companies think social media monitoring gives them useful customer information they can pass along to other departments.[3]
  • Nearly 91% of all social media users access various social media networks using their mobile devices.[3]
  • Nearly 96% of all dissatisfied consumers do not inform businesses of their displeasure, but they are likely to inform their friends about it on social media.[3]
  • When companies address consumer concerns about their brand on social media, they may raise customer advocacy by 25% .[3]
  • According to 63% of marketing teams, monitoring social media analytics will be increasingly crucial in the years to come.[3]
  • 49% of internet shoppers stop following firms on social media because of poor quality goods or customer service.[3]
  • The size of the worldwide social media market is anticipated to increase from 159.68 billion in 2021 to 223.11 billion in 2022 at a CAGR of 39.7% .[3]
  • Between 2017 and 2022, the market size for social networking sites in the U.S increased by an average of more than 20% annually.[3]
  • Inconsequential content and excessive advertising both account for 45% of internet buyers unfollowing firms.[3]
  • 43% of the world’s population spent more time on social media during the COVID-19 crisis.[3]
  • 70% of Pinterest users say that they trust the platform when it comes to researching products from the brands that they like.[3]
  • We found a total of 1,415,750 mentions related to COVID-19 which gives the average 47,192 mentions per day. 95.36% (1,350,059) of mentions were people’s updates and expressions, 4.64% (65,691) mentions were articles from news portals and social media.[4]
  • Responding to customers on social media increases their likelihood of making a purchase from you by 21% .[5]
  • A recent research found that just 27% of the time could political ideology be accurately predicted from user tweets, noting that the forecasting task was more challenging and complex than previously thought.[6]
  • The TSA creates watch lists for its silent partner and quiet skies programs using ATS, according to a privacy impact study issued in April 2019.[6]
  • According to government documents, one of the plaintiffs, Hassan Shibly, executive director of the Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, was pulled aside for secondary screening at the border at least 20 times from 2004 to 2011.[6]
  • Babel Street Technology, according to the company’s website, provide access to millions of data sources in more than 200 languages and a variety of analytical capabilities, including sentiment analysis in 18 languages and link analysis.[6]
  • However, the DHS privacy office was unable to confirm if CBP was complying with this obligation, according to the 2017 privacy assessment of ESTA.[6]
  • CBP likely uses Babel Street’s web-based application, Babel X, which is a multilingual text-analytics platform that has access to more than 25 social media sites, including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.[6]
  • According to studies, these instruments’ greatest accuracy rate is about 80%, with top-rated tools generally achieving 70–75 percent accuracy.[6]
  • The 2018 directive changed CBP’s previous, more permissive rule, likely as a partial and belated response to a 2013 federal court decision, United States v. Cotterman.[6]
  • More than 900,000 immigrant and non-immigrant visas were granted by the department of state to citizens of nations with a majority of Muslims in F.Y. 2018, which is likely to have included hundreds of thousands of young Muslim males.[6]
  • Later, the researchers extended their research to 41 nations and discovered that, for phrases that users feared may get them in legal problems with the U.S. government, search frequency decreased by roughly 4% globally.[6]
  • While DHS itself does not provide a breakdown, ABC News reports that about 80 percent of searches are of noncitizens, which would mean that in fiscal year 2017, CBP conducted more than 6,000 searches of devices belonging to U.S. citizens.[6]
  • While the privacy impact assessment does not specify that ADACS4 includes social media data, it seems likely given that such information is typically found on electronic devices.[6]
  • The review’s findings, for instance, indicate that, depending on the kind of social media platform used, between 4 to 62% of the study populations in different nations utilize social media as a source of information about vaccination.[7]
  • Internet world stats estimates that there were 1.90 billion daily active Facebook users worldwide in 2021, increasing by 69% from the previous year.[8]
  • 6.8 trillion USD were invested in digital transformation globally in 2020, according to an IDC report, as a result of both public and private investments.[8]
  • According to the ListenFirsts Media Marketing Trends Survey in 2022, almost 55% of respondents would spend money on advanced social media to improve returns on investments.[8]
  • Facebook’s active monthly users, who have access to its platform, hit 2.90 billion, a growth of 71.8% from 2021 to 2020.[8]
  • The market is anticipated to increase at a CAGR of 16.5% from 2022 to 2029, rising from 3.96 billion USD to 11.54 billion USD.[8]

Also Read

How Useful is Media Monitoring

One of the primary reasons why media monitoring is so valuable lies in its ability to offer a panoramic picture of public opinion. By tapping into various sources of news, commentary, and social media discussions, individuals and organizations gain invaluable insights into public sentiment, trends, and concerns. A thorough media monitoring strategy can help identify emerging patterns, detect potential crises or controversies, and serve as an early warning system. It enables decision-makers to stay ahead of the curve, adapt to changing market conditions, and make informed choices.

Moreover, media monitoring provides an essential platform for reputation management. In today’s hyperconnected world, brands, public figures, and institutions are under constant scrutiny. Media monitoring allows them to actively listen, address concerns, and engage with the public. By closely monitoring mentions, reviews, or hashtags related to their name, organizations can respond promptly to critics and maintain their public image. Media monitoring fosters transparency, accountability, and responsiveness, crucial factors for building trust and credibility in the digital era.

For journalists and news organizations, media monitoring serves as an indispensable research and fact-checking tool. By tracking diverse news outlets and sources, reporters can gain a comprehensive view of a story, identify biases, and ensure accuracy in reporting. Media monitoring also facilitates the discovery of alternative angles, underreported stories, or discrepancies, promoting investigative journalism and the search for truth.

In addition, media monitoring acts as a catalyst for public discourse and democracy. By extensively monitoring public opinion on various topics, policy-makers can better understand societal concerns and gauge the pulse of the people. This real-time information allows them to make evidence-based decisions, articulate policies that genuinely address citizens’ needs, and encourage transparent governance. Media monitoring empowers citizens by amplifying their voices and ensuring that feedback is listened to, creating an environment where public participation is valued.

Critics argue that media monitoring breeds an obsession with, rather than a critical analysis of, media coverage. They claim that relying on media monitoring alone may limit the understanding of complex issues by oversimplifying nuanced topics into mere media narratives. However, these concerns overlook the crucial role media monitoring plays in complementing traditional research techniques. It is not a substitute for in-depth investigations or limiting oneself to media narratives but an additional layer of information that aids in constructing a more comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena.

The truth is, in our fast-paced and interconnected world, media monitoring is no longer a choice but a necessity. As media landscape continues to evolve and expand, the ability to effectively monitor, analyze and adapt to the ever-changing news cycle will determine the success of individuals, organizations, and governments. By harnessing the power of media monitoring, we can truly understand the social fabric, steer public dialogues, prevent crises, and support democratic processes. Ignoring the utility of media monitoring would be akin to operating in the dark, unaware of the forces that shape public opinion and perception.

Reference


  1. brand24 – https://brand24.com/blog/what-is-media-monitoring-and-analysis/
  2. everyonesocial – https://everyonesocial.com/blog/social-listening-statistics/
  3. financesonline – https://financesonline.com/social-media-monitoring-statistics/
  4. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33050772/
  5. sproutsocial – https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-monitoring/
  6. brennancenter – https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/social-media-monitoring
  7. europa – https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/systematic-scoping-review-social-media-monitoring-methods-and-interventions
  8. fortunebusinessinsights – https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/media-monitoring-tools-market-104157

About Author & Editorial Staff

Steve Goldstein, founder of LLCBuddy, is a specialist in corporate formations, dedicated to guiding entrepreneurs and small business owners through the LLC process. LLCBuddy provides a wealth of streamlined resources such as guides, articles, and FAQs, making LLC establishment seamless. The diligent editorial staff makes sure content is accurate, up-to-date information on topics like state-specific requirements, registered agents, and compliance. Steve's enthusiasm for entrepreneurship makes LLCBuddy an essential and trustworthy resource for launching and running an LLC.

Leave a Comment