Meeting Management Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Meeting Management Statistics 2023: Facts about Meeting Management outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Meeting Management, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Meeting Management Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Meeting Management Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 66 Meeting Management Statistics on this page 🙂

Meeting Management “Latest” Statistics

  • According to 2018 Workplace Distraction Report, regular days with no meetings were chosen by 23% of respondents as a solution for their business to lessen workplace distraction.[1]
  • More than a third (37%) of professionals consider unnecessary meetings to be the biggest cost to their organization.[1]
  • 23% of professionals in the USA spend time in meetings, while the 23% of German professionals spend 2 and a half hours in meetings every week.[1]
  • If given the opportunity to video conference, 57% of respondents would travel less and telecommute more, and 67% would have more interaction with coworkers and feel more at ease working in remote offices more often.[1]
  • 60% of status meeting attendees reported that preparing for a status meeting takes longer than the meeting itself (4.6 hours vs. 4.5 hours).[1]
  • 88% of respondents said that they feel less at ease making video calls than they do making voice ones. (LoopUp, 2018)[1]
  • An overwhelming 79% of Americans felt that one or two team members often led meetings’ talks and ideas.[1]
  • 61% of the highest paid C-suite executives don’t know what their goals will be once they start working.[1]
  • Apart from being more engaged during video conferences, employees are also more prepared, 63% admitted to spending more time preparing for a video conference call than an in person meeting.[1]
  • Baby Boomers feel in-person meetings is the communication mode that makes them the happiest the most strongly (85%), Gen X and Millennials less so (71% and 62%, respectively) and Gen Z least so (46%).[1]
  • Conference calls have a serious security hole that is often ignored, as 70% of callers say it’s perfectly acceptable to discuss sensitive material but only 50% say it’s likewise usual to not know who is on the call.[1]
  • Employees acknowledge doing a variety of tasks while in meetings, with checking email coming in at 69%, working on other projects at 49%, and eating at 44% .[1]
  • At the root of the problem is a lack of face to face communication that holds employees accountable and reduces multitasking. 56% say they multitask most often on phone conferences, and that number drops to 16% during in person meetings and most significantly to 4% during video conferences.[1]
  • Meetings typically lasted between 30 and 1 hour, 49% for up to 12 hours, 7% for less than 30 minutes, and 7% for more than 2 hours.[1]
  • 51% of employees are invited to meetings that are irrelevant to them, a misuse of time and resources.[1]
  • According to Klaxoon (2019), 41% of workers attended more meetings in the last year while only 14% took part in fewer meetings.[1]
  • More than three quarters of people (78%) feel that their meeting schedule is either always or sometimes out of control and most blame their crazy meeting schedules upper management (38%) or their direct manager (16%).[1]
  • Almost two thirds (71%) of working people waste time each week because of pointless or postponed meetings.[1]
  • Finance executives attend meetings for 24% of their time on average. According to finance executives, meetings squander on average 21% of their time.[1]
  • One-on-one meetings increased by 18% and check-ins and team social meetings grew by 10%, with half of these new meetings taking place on a recurring basis.[1]
  • Only 22% of people regularly take conference calls from their mobile device, and only 7% regularly join via voice-over-IP (VoIP).[1]
  • Poorly organized or cancelled meetings pose the biggest time drain to businesses in the UK, with 40% of employees believing this is the biggest threat to their company’s time.[1]
  • In-person meetings are valued roughly equally by remote and non remote employees (47.11% vs. 46.67%).[1]
  • Sixty four of workers have more meetings than they did a year ago, and 43% of employees have more unplanned meetings. (Blue Jeans Network by Verizon, 2018)[1]
  • The typical meeting lasts an hour, with 54% of business people reporting that their meetings typically last between 30 minutes and an hour.[1]
  • In meetings throughout America, the most important elements that affect decision making are best idea (38%), group thought (29%), senior management (25%) and team vote (9%).[1]
  • The types of meetings respondents have on a regular basis include: internal collaborations and meetings (73%); external meetings with customers, vendors, or partners (56%); presentations (57%); events and webinars (42%); and training (51%).[1]
  • This increases the likelihood of a single tardy participant and helps to explain why, on average, 37% of meetings start late.[1]
  • According to workers, helpful and/or productive meetings take up 10% of their week, whereas useless meetings take up 8% of their time.[1]
  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that the number of jobs for meeting and event planners will increase by 11% between 2016 and 2026.[2]
  • However, 98% of U.S. government workers agree that in person meetings are crucial for their organization.[2]
  • A collaborative document is still not being used by 51% of participants to record meeting notes.[3]
  • One of the biggest pet peeves, according to 64% individuals, is when one person dominates the talk. Go around the room and get input from the team members who are more reserved.[3]
  • Despite the fact that successful remote work requires asynchronous communication, 36.78% individuals indicated they had never heard of asynchronous meetings.[3]
  • 80% of those who utilize a meeting productivity tool like fellow report that they typically or always follow up after the meeting on meeting action items.[3]
  • Weekly team meetings are the most typical sort of meeting, with 89% indicating they go to one per week.[3]
  • Only 17% of senior executives from various sectors said that meetings are typically effective uses of both group and individual time.[4]
  • 30% of planners wouldn’t attend in-person meetings under any circumstances, and an additional 32.7% would attend only if the meetings were both small and local. A mere 14% have no qualms whatsoever. (EventMB, 2020)[5]
  • Internal team meetings and trainings are the most popular form of meeting activity in North America, accounting for 17% of the market in 2020.[5]
  • 53% of visitors in the U.S. attend corporate and business meetings, 18% attend conventions, conferences, and congresses without an exhibition floor, and 16% attend trade fairs or conferences with an exhibiting component.[5]
  • Internal team meetings/trainings represent 19% for Europe, 16% for Asia Pacific and 19% for Central/South America.[5]
  • According to 45% of senior executives, the only way to enhance productivity among the workforce would be to reduce meetings to only one day each week.[6]
  • 49% of workers acknowledged to multitasking during meetings rather than paying attention to the agenda.[6]
  • In meetings, 76% of professionals prefer face to face communication over phone calls or video conferencing.[6]
  • 95% of professionals believe that face to face interactions are better for fostering professional connections.[6]
  • More than 35% of workers discovered that they squander 2 to 5 hours every day on calls and meetings yet produce no results.[6]
  • Since the pandemic, the rate of one-on-one meetings increased by 18%, and check-ins and team social meetings increased by 10%, with half the meetings taking place regularly.[6]
  • Younger workers are 10% more likely to be concerned by persons eating in meetings but 15% less likely to be bothered by mobile phone use.[6]
  • The percentage of persons who prefer face-to-face meetings falls to 68% for those who attend meetings often.[7]
  • Top managers might spend up to 50% of their time in meetings and intermediate managers up to 35%.[7]
  • Meetings conducted through audio or video conferencing are now preferred by 20% and 12% of participants, respectively.[7]
  • According to reports, 17% of meetings were rated as great. 42% of respondents rated themselves as excellent, 25% as neutral, and 15% as terrible or worse.[7]
  • Busy professionals with 15 or more meetings average a 10.13 hour workday, or 50.7 hour workweek, increasing 13.2% from 9.0 hours in February 2020.[8]
  • Meeting demands have prompted employees to add an extra 7 hours to their weekly schedules in only 20 short months, as the number of meetings has climbed by over 70%.[8]
  • The average meeting duration has reduced by 10.9% since February 2020, when it was 56.8 minutes.[8]
  • One-on-one meetings were found to be the largest increase in the overall rise in the total number of meetings on the calendar, accounting for 79.6% of new meetings.[8]
  • Less than 10% of participants attend up to 70% of their meetings in person, while only 23% attend up to 30% of their meetings in person.[8]
  • We discovered that more than 40% of one-on-one meetings are rescheduled on a weekly basis, requiring an average of over 10 minutes each new scheduling.[8]
  • 64% of event professionals say their overall meeting spend is increasing in 2022 (AMEX, 2021).[9]
  • 85% of senior managers, executives, and board members agree that in-person meetings are essential to the success of their organization.[9]
  • 88% of respondents expect meetings in 2022 will have an in-person component (AMEX, 2021).[9]
  • Meeting, convention, and event planner jobs are expected to increase by 18% between 2020 and 2030, which is substantially faster than the average for all professions.[10]
  • 70% of professionals think that morning, specifically between 8am-12pm, is the best time to hold a meeting.[11]
  • 57% of professionals think that improperly attended meetings are the biggest cost to their company.[11]
  • Meetings take up 15% of an organization’s total time. Waste from ineffective meetings totals more than $37 billion annually.[12]
  • The University of North Carolina surveyed 182 senior managers in various industries and 65% of them said that meetings keep them from completing their task.[13]

Also Read

How Useful is Meeting Management

Effective meeting management is crucial for ensuring that time is used efficiently, decisions are made promptly, and communication flows smoothly. A well-run meeting can lead to increased morale, higher productivity, and improved team collaboration. On the other hand, poorly managed meetings can lead to frustration, wasted time, and decreased employee engagement.

One of the key benefits of effective meeting management is the ability to keep discussions focused and on track. By setting clear goals and agendas, meeting organizers can ensure that participants stay on topic and make progress towards achieving the intended outcomes. This structured approach helps to prevent tangents, distractions, and unnecessary delays, allowing everyone to make the most of their time together.

Additionally, meeting management involves assigning roles and responsibilities to participants to ensure that everyone has a clear understanding of their expectations. By designating a facilitator to lead the meeting, a timekeeper to keep track of the agenda, and a note-taker to document key points, each person can contribute to the overall success of the meeting. This collaborative effort helps to distribute the workload and create a sense of shared accountability among team members.

Another important aspect of meeting management is establishing ground rules and guidelines for communication. By setting expectations for how people should interact, such as encouraging active listening, respecting different opinions, and limiting interruptions, meetings can become more inclusive and productive. This creates a positive and constructive environment where all participants can feel valued and heard.

Furthermore, effective meeting management involves following up on action items and decisions made during the meeting. By assigning tasks to specific individuals, setting deadlines, and tracking progress, meeting organizers can ensure that outcomes are achieved and accountability is maintained. This follow-up process helps to reinforce the importance of the meeting and its impact on the organization’s overall goals.

In conclusion, meeting management plays a vital role in the success of any organization. By implementing strategies to keep discussions focused, assign roles and responsibilities, establish communication guidelines, and follow up on action items, meetings can become more productive, efficient, and engaging. When done correctly, meeting management can lead to increased teamwork, improved decision-making, and a more positive work environment. It is essential for organizations to prioritize effective meeting management to maximize the value of their meetings and drive success.


  1. bettermeetings –
  2. convene –
  3. fellow –
  4. hbr –
  5. skift –
  6. otter –
  7. projectmanagernews –
  8. reclaim –
  9. bizzabo –
  10. bls –
  11. booqed –
  12. cornerstonedynamics –
  13. forbes –

Leave a Comment