Missouri Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Missouri Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Missouri reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Missouri Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Missouri LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Missouri Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Missouri Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 73 Missouri Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Missouri Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • According to information from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, 167 abortions were carried out in the state in 2020.[1]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[2]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were nonspecialized clinics hospitals made up 33%, and private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[2]
  • 90% of abortions among St. Louis area females reported to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services were performed by planned parenthood’s reproductive health services, which is the area’s main abortion provider.[3]
  • An analysis from 2014, according to a Public Religion Research Institute study, 51% of white women in the state believed that abortion is legal in all or most cases.[4]
  • In 2020, there were 930160 abortions reported by Guttmacher’s abortion provider census, an 8% rise from 2017 when the data was previously gathered.[5]
  • For the purposes of calculating sample size, we determined that a 50–60% decrease in the study population or a 67% increase in the baseline rates of adolescent births and repeat abortions were of clinical and public health significance.[3]
  • The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age resided in states that restrict access to abortion.[6]
  • In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. Of patients who had an abortion in 2014, one-third had to travel more than 25 miles one way to reach a facility 2.[2]
  • Six percent—88 abortions carried out at or after 20 weeks of gestation—represent two of the abortions carried out at 20 weeks and four of the abortions carried out at 21 weeks or later.[7]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, Missouri’s abortion rate fell by 8%, from 4.4 to 4.0 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[2]
  • The data, when broken down by race, reveals that, since 1984, the abortion rate for whites under 18 has dropped by 46%, while the rate for blacks has dropped by 19%.[8]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 87% of the abortions carried out in Missouri were on people who lived outside the state.[9]
  • The majority of abortion operations, or 47% of the abortions carried out on Missouri citizens, were chemical abortions.[7]
  • Data on occurrences similar to the abortions performed on Missouri residents are 1,471 abortions, and 58% were performed on women in their twenties.[7]
  • 9,256 young people and women joined the choice between August 2007 and September 2011, and 16% of them were recruited in abortion facilities.[3]
  • These numbers represent a 20% increase in clinics from 2014 when there were two abortion-providing facilities overall, of which one was clinics, 89% of U.S. counties lacked abortion facilities in 2017.[2]
  • In that year, a county without an abortion facility housed 94% of the state’s women aged 15 to 44.[4]
  • For instance, between 2017 and 2020, the number of abortions increased by 25% in Illinois, a state with much fewer such laws, while an increasing number of abortion restrictions in Missouri drove more patients to go across state lines for treatment.[5]
  • From 29.1 to 14.7 in 2019, the total number of abortions reported in the state fell by 49% while chemical abortions dropped by a striking 96%.[7]
  • Women having one past abortion made up 23% of the population, while those with two or more prior abortions made up 13%.[7]
  • As a consequence, there were 135 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[2]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[10]
  • Just 27% of abortions recorded in Missouri were carried out before nine weeks of gestation, in contrast to those carried out on Missouri citizens.[7]
  • Estimated population impact of the contraceptive choice project and abortion rates per 1,000 women and adolescents in St. Louis and the United States.[3]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the united states in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[2]
  • According to preliminary data last year, only 151 abortions occurred in Missouri, which includes those in hospitals.[11]
  • For calculating sample size, we determined that a 50–60% decrease in the study population or a 67% increase in the baseline rates of adolescent births and repeat abortions were of clinical and public health significance.[3]

Missouri Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • Due to their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 4.8 per 1,000 women.[12]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[13]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[10]
  • In the U.S., there have been significantly fewer adolescent births in recent years, with a 44% fall from 1991 to 2010 to a frequency of 34.3 per 1,000.[3]
  • Since 1991, adolescent birth rates in the U.S. have been progressively dropping. For childbearing teenagers between 15 and 19, the birth rate has declined by 61%.[14]
  • Since its high year in 1991, Missouri’s adolescent pregnancy rates have dropped by 61%, with an additional 8% drop since 2014.[15]
  • Since up to 80% of these births are unwanted, we used the number of adolescent births per 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19 as a proxy for an unexpected pregnancy.[3]
  • The 25.9% child poverty rate in New Mexico is a significant contributor to adolescent pregnancies.[12]
  • Increased adolescent pregnancy rates are associated with poverty and income disparity. Gold et al. 2002 economically disadvantaged youth are more likely to give birth than their less disadvantaged peers, Levine and Kearney 2014.[16]
  • In Alabama, 74% of adolescent births occur to older youths ages 18 to 19, and 16% occur to minors who are already parents.[12]
  • The adolescent birth rate in Alabama has significantly declined over the previous several decades, by around 63% since 1991.[12]
  • According to the data, the top-risk counties for adolescent pregnancies are 72% of prep counties, with the potential to affect the remaining high-risk counties.[14]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[12]
  • Since 1991i, adolescent birth rates in the U.S. have been progressively dropping. For childbearing teenagers between 15 and 19, the birth rate has declined by 61% since 1991.[14]

Missouri Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • Nine to ten weeks of gestation saw 17% of deliveries, whereas eleven to twelve weeks saw 11% of deliveries, and thirteen to fourteen weeks saw 5% of deliveries.[7]
  • 51% of all pregnancies in Missouri, not only among teenagers, are reported by women as being unplanned.[10]
  • Measures of Missouri 2021 Health of Women show teen birth rates fell by 32% between 2013 and 2019, from 30.0 to 20.3 births per 1,000 girls aged 15–19.[13]

Missouri Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • Women are kicked off Medicaid by the state 60 days after their pregnancy is finished if they earn no more than 21% of the federal poverty level, which amounts to roughly 6,000 per year for a family of four.[17]
  • Approximately 82% of respondents said they were in favor of educating students about contraception, alternative means of avoiding pregnancy, and STDs.[18]
  • We are dedicated to tackling ongoing health inequalities that surround unwanted pregnancies and disadvantaged communities in order to reduce Missouri’s unintended pregnancy rate by 10%.[19]
  • Of women who use illegal drugs 18.4% of women aged 18-49 or older, 13% have pregnancy depression, and 14.6% of women have recently given birth to living children.[13]

Missouri Abortion “Maternity” Statistics

  • The number of singleton term vertex first births through cesarean section 23.9% score for 22 maternity practices obstetrical procedures.[13]

Missouri Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • Pregnant women are eligible if their income is up to 30.5% of the poverty level, but they cannot apply until they are sure they are expecting, which may not happen for many weeks or even months.[17]
  • According to the Missouri Census Data Center 2020, 75% of Missouri’s youngsters aged 17 and under identify as non-Hispanic white, while 15% identify as non.[16]
  • According to the United Health Foundation, even with such a low standard, Missouri remains one of the worst states in the U.S. with a rate of 32.6 fatalities per 100,000 live births, ranking 42nd in 2018.[17]
  • According to research conducted in St. Louis, 36% of women missed workdays because of a shortage of menstrual hygiene products.[4]
  • We discovered these individuals were more likely to choose a LARC approach at enrollment than were girls and women recruited at the other recruiting clinics (84.5% vs 72.9%).[3]
  • Once a youth is already sexually active, they are less likely to change their sexual behaviors.[16]
  • Preterm birth rates grew slightly from 2014 to 96.3% in 2015, while low birthweight rates increased to 80.7%.[18]
  • Sleep position percentage of women with a recent live birth, 31% youth smoking and tobacco use.[13]
  • According to estimates, there were 3.5 births per 1,000 women in 2015, a decrease in the total fertility rate.[18]
  • Comprehensive housing affordability strategy 2013–2017 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 49.2%.[13]
  • For actions, there is a correlation between each extra instance of poor conduct in class and a 31% rise in sexual behavior intention.[16]
  • Knowledge adversely affects sexual intents; for every increased knowledge point, there is a 16% reduction in sexual activity intentions.[16]
  • We predicted that 3% of our cohort would pick an implant and 10% of the cohort would choose an IUD, which is about double the current IUD and implant usage rates in the U.S.[3]
  • It raises the risk of suicide, which accounts for 20% of fatalities in the months after giving birth.[17]
  • The sample is 57% female, with 44% of respondents identifying as white 20% people of other races and 37% African American.[16]
  • According to the United Health Foundation, more than the national average of 12.8%, 14% of Missouri women who gave birth last year had postpartum depression.[17]
  • We made the supposition that the remaining St. Louis population that was not a part of the research would not change, with an alpha of 005 and a power of 80%.[3]
  • The general population’s median age was 25. African Americans made up 51%. 39% struggled to pay for necessities, 37% required governmental help, and 35% had just completed high school.[3]
  • Missouri is the 42nd lowest maternal mortality state in the U.S, according to the United Health Foundation’s 2018 America health rankings. Poor women in the united states had problems paying for menstrual pads and tampons in 2018 and 2019.[4]
  • The scientists calculated that giving low-income women increased access to contraception prevented over 286,000 unplanned births using a Markov model.[3]
  • In New Mexico, 81% of minors who gave birth in 2017 were Hispanic, as were 55.1% of female youths aged 15 to 19 who identify as Hispanic.[12]
  • The number of twin births decreased to 33.5 per 1000. The triplet and higher-order multiple birth rates were down 9% to 10.3 per 100000.[18]
  • 11% of pregnancies were reported to be between 13 and 14 weeks, 8% between 15 and 16 weeks, and 7% between 17 and 19 weeks.[7]

Also Read

How Useful is Missouri Abortion

In considering the usefulness of Missouri abortion, it is important to take into account the various perspectives and arguments that have been put forth on both sides of the issue. One of the key areas of contention is the impact that abortion has on women’s health and well-being. Proponents of abortion argue that access to safe and legal abortion services is essential for women’s health, as it allows them to end pregnancies that may pose a risk to their physical or mental health. They also argue that restricting access to abortion can lead to unsafe and illegal procedures that jeopardize women’s well-being.

Opponents of abortion, on the other hand, argue that abortion is harmful to women’s health and well-being. Some believe that abortion can have negative physical and psychological effects on women, including a higher risk of complications with future pregnancies. Others argue that abortion can have a detrimental impact on women’s mental health, leading to feelings of guilt, regret, and depression.

Another aspect of the usefulness of Missouri abortion is its impact on society as a whole. Proponents of abortion argue that access to safe and legal abortion services is beneficial for society, as it allows women to make choices about their reproductive health and future. They believe that restricting access to abortion can have negative social and economic consequences, as it can force women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, leading to increased poverty and strain on social services.

Opponents of abortion, on the other hand, argue that abortion has a negative impact on society, as it devalues human life and contributes to a culture of death. They believe that abortion erodes the sanctity of life and can lead to a disregard for the value of all human beings, born and unborn.

In conclusion, the usefulness of Missouri abortion is a complex and multifaceted issue that elicits strong emotions and opinions on both sides. It is clear that there are compelling arguments to be made on both sides of the debate, and that the decision about the usefulness of abortion in Missouri is a deeply personal and individual one. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to weigh the arguments and make a decision that aligns with their own beliefs and values.


  1. kcur – https://www.kcur.org/news/2021-11-20/nearly-half-of-abortions-in-kansas-are-for-missouri-residents-but-voters-could-end-that
  2. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-missouri
  3. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000282/
  4. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Missouri
  5. npr – https://www.npr.org/2022/06/15/1105037393/with-roe-on-the-precipice-americans-are-having-more-abortions
  6. politico – https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/03/bortion-statistics-by-state-map-00029740
  7. lozierinstitute – https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-missouri-2019/
  8. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7638977/
  9. abort73 – https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/missouri/
  10. powertodecide – https://powertodecide.org/what-we-do/information/national-state-data/missouri
  11. missouriindependent – https://missouriindependent.com/2022/04/08/with-few-in-state-abortions-missouri-lawmakers-look-toward-a-post-roe-v-wade-future/
  12. worldpopulationreview – https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/teen-pregnancy-rates-by-state
  13. americashealthrankings – https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/health-of-women-and-children/measure/TeenBirth_MCH/state/MO
  14. missouri – https://truman.missouri.edu/institute-public-policy/news/missouri-teen-pregnancy-prevention-program-seventh-year
  15. teenpregnancy-mo – https://www.teenpregnancy-mo.org/resources/research-and-statistics/
  16. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121257/
  17. kansascity – https://www.kansascity.com/news/business/health-care/article231126448.html
  18. researchgate – https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338026575_Missouri_Sex_Education_Policy_Recommendations_for_Revision_to_Reduce_Teen_Pregnancy_Rates
  19. mffh – https://mffh.org/our-focus/unintended-pregnancy/
  20. pewresearch – https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/compare/views-about-abortion/by/state/

Leave a Comment