Network Access Control Statistics

Network Access Control Statistics 2023: Facts about Network Access Control outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Network Access Control, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Network Access Control Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Network Access Control Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 17 Network Access Control Statistics on this page 🙂

---

Network Access Control “Latest” Statistics

• In the future projection period, the IT telecom sector is anticipated to have a market share of 60%.^[1]
• It is expected that the market for network access control will expand at a CAGR of over 22% from 2022 to 2032, reaching $15.37 billion.^[1]
• Over the next seven years, the BFSI sector, which generated over 29% of total revenue, is expected to continue to be the top end.^[2]
• The hardware sector generated 58% of total revenue, and it is anticipated that it will continue to be the dominant solution vertical during the projected year.^[2]
• Over the next seven years, it is expected that the integration services category, which accounted for over 47% of the market in 2014, will continue to be the market leader.^[2]
• In 2014, the software sector contributed 42% of total revenue; by 2022, that percentage is anticipated to rise to 45%.^[2]
• When asked to assess the amount of authority on choices to update physical access control systems in the HID/ASIS study, 22% stated IT was engaged in either the final suggestion or the final decision, while 46% said IT was completely consulted.^[3]
• Integrated physical and logical access control was chosen as the top technological breakthrough that would have the most influence on enhancing the organization’s overall access control system for 28% of respondents.^[3]
• By the end of 2021, 50% of businesses that now use mobile authentication will switch to it as their principal verification method.^[3]
• According to a 2019 HID poll, 54% of organizations have updated or plan to upgrade to a mobile access control system in the next three years.^[3]
• Video or intrusion detection systems are currently installed as part of 36% of access control installations in educational settings.^[3]
• According to a 2019 survey by the ASIS foundation, just 24% of businesses in the United States, Europe, and India have combined physical and cyber security, and there is no indication that this is rising.^[3]
• 40% of the data on the internet of things will be stored, processed, reviewed, and used close to or at the network’s edge by the end of the year.^[3]
• The worldwide market for contactless biometric technology will rise five times to reach 70 billion by 2030, riding the wave of the COVID-19 epidemic to a CAGR compound annual growth rate of 17.4%.^[3]
• The top access control concerns were identified utilizing characteristics of modern technology (39%) and protection against growing vulnerabilities (38%).^[3]
• Security directors cooperate with IT departments to build security best practices for their facilities (61%), according to the HID/ASIS survey, and seek new technologies (55%).^[3]
• The market worth of this industry has increased by 50% since December 2015, in part because of the use of analytics behavior and associated biometric modalities.^[3]

Also Read

How Useful is Network Access Control

One of the key benefits of NAC is its ability to enforce security policies and restrictions on device and user access to the network. By defining rules and policies for access, organizations can prevent unauthorized devices or users from connecting to the network, reducing the risk of a breach or compromise. This capability is particularly crucial in today’s connected world, where the number of devices accessing corporate networks continues to rise.

In addition to enforcing security policies, NAC also provides organizations with visibility into who and what is accessing their network. By tracking and monitoring network activity, organizations can detect and respond to suspicious behavior or potential threats in real-time. This level of visibility is essential in helping organizations identify and remediate security incidents quickly, reducing the impact and potential damage caused by a breach.

Furthermore, NAC plays a crucial role in compliance management by ensuring that devices connecting to the network meet organizational security standards and regulatory requirements. By enforcing compliance checks, organizations can have greater confidence in the security posture of their network and avoid costly fines or penalties for non-compliance. This is particularly important for organizations operating in heavily regulated industries where compliance is a top priority.

Despite these benefits, the usefulness of NAC can be limited by several factors. One challenge organizations may face is the complexity of implementing and managing NAC solutions. Depending on the size and scale of the organization, configuring NAC policies and rules can be a daunting task that requires time, resources, and expertise. Additionally, ensuring that NAC solutions are integrated with existing cybersecurity tools and technologies can be a challenge, leading to potential gaps in security coverage.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of NAC relies heavily on the cooperation and compliance of end-users. If users are not educated on security best practices or do not understand the importance of following NAC policies, they may inadvertently bypass or circumvent security controls, leaving the network vulnerable to attack. In such cases, organizations may need to invest in ongoing training and awareness programs to ensure end-users understand their role in maintaining network security.

In conclusion, while NAC can be a powerful tool in securing networks and protecting against cyber threats, its usefulness is contingent on several factors, including implementation complexity, user compliance, and integration with existing cybersecurity technologies. To maximize the benefits of NAC, organizations should invest in robust solutions, prioritize user education and awareness, and regularly assess and update their security policies to adapt to evolving threats.

Reference

---

1. factmr – https://www.factmr.com/report/4061/network-access-control-market
2. grandviewresearch – https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/network-access-control-market
3. swiftlane – https://www.swiftlane.com/blog/the-future-of-access-control/