Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics 2023: Facts about Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 24 Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics on this page 🙂

Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment “Latest” Statistics

  • 18 persons with high-functioning ASD with a mean age of 28 to 95 years were treated with memantine at a mean dosage of 19.7 ± 1.2 mg/day; a range of 15 to 20 mg per day, and 94% of the study participants finished it.[1]
  • 83% of the 364 randomly assigned participants who were males finished the main endpoint, 86% of them completed it, and 80% of them completed the final endpoint.[1]
  • The estimated percentage of children having a genetic cause among those who received both CMA and WES testing was 15.8%.[1]
  • Although ASD affects between 0.1% and 1.8% of the world’s population, ASD’s pathophysiology is still not fully known.[1]
  • Children with autism spectrum disorders often have epileptiform abnormalities on electroencephalography. ASDs reported to occur between 10% and 72% of the time.[1]
  • Group 2 treatment/placebo showed a 14.15% change for the placebo with a -3.98% change for the treatment.[1]
  • A person receives treatment using hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which involves breathing at pressures above normal atmospheric pressure while consuming 10% oxygen.[1]
  • ASD is a public health issue that affects youngsters between 0.6% and 1.7% of the time.[1]
  • In an independent 81-sample validation set, subsets of these characteristics correctly categorized the ASD and TD samples with average accuracies of 84% and 86% and with a maximum accuracy of 81%.[1]
  • Up to 74% of children with ASD utilize new, unorthodox, and off-label medications, yet treating doctors often are not aware of their use.[1]
  • Memantine therapy was linked to a substantial decrease in clinician and informant-rated clinical global impression improvement subscale 83% assessments of autism severity.[1]
  • There is a great chance for your students to thrive and realize their full learning potential since some of our customers have attained 10% accomplishment.[2]
  • 13% of all kids enrolled in school have an Individualized Education Plan, or IEP, which necessitates extensive modifications to the core curriculum to fit their requirements.[3]
  • DHS organization’s neuro-diverse testing teams produce 30% more than the others.[4]
  • In 2020, SAP intends to have 1% of its workforce that is neuro-diverse. This figure was picked since it nearly reflects the prevalence of autism in the general community.[4]
  • The unemployment rate might reach 80%. This number includes those who are more severely ill yet are not eligible for neurodiversity programs.[4]
  • 7% of people require mental health services. Brain damage was acquired by 5% of people.[5]
  • Geographically, North America is the biggest market for cognitive assessment, with a consumption market share of about 37%, followed by Europe with a consumption market share of about 26% in 2018.[6]
  • With a market share close to 17%, Pearson was the most significant company in cognitive evaluation.[6]
  • American Psychiatric Association’s most recent recommendations estimated a prevalence of up to 6%.[7]
  • Diagnostic standards and service accessibility impact the prevalence, which ranges from 1% to 1.6% internationally.[7]
  • Just 6% of participants across 301 studies on autism exhibited intellectual impairment, compared to 30% of the autistic community.[8]
  • People sometimes assume incorrectly that autistic school-aged children with limited language skills—about 30% of them—are less intelligent than other children.[8]
  • The researchers used 242 children and young people with fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome, or other types of intellectual impairment to test the battery, and they discovered that over 80% of individuals with a mental age of at least 4 get reliable findings from it.[8]

Also Read

How Useful is Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment

One of the primary arguments in favor of neurodiversity cognitive assessments is that they can help educators and professionals tailor interventions and support strategies to meet the unique needs of neurodiverse individuals. By identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses, these assessments can guide the development of targeted interventions that enhance learning outcomes and improve overall wellbeing.

Moreover, neurodiversity cognitive assessments can empower individuals by providing them with a better understanding of their own cognitive functioning. This self-awareness can be instrumental in building self-esteem and self-advocacy skills, enabling individuals to navigate challenges more effectively and advocate for their own needs.

On the other hand, skeptics of neurodiversity cognitive assessments raise concerns about their limitations and potential harm. Critics argue that these assessments may oversimplify complex neurological conditions and reinforce stereotypes about individuals with neurodiverse traits. Furthermore, there is a risk of stigmatization and labeling that may have negative consequences on individuals’ self-perception and social interactions.

In addition, the validity and reliability of neurodiversity cognitive assessments have been called into question. Some critics argue that these assessments may not be culturally sensitive or considerate of the unique experiences and backgrounds of neurodiverse individuals. This raises concerns about whether the results of these assessments truly reflect individuals’ cognitive abilities and potential.

Ultimately, the debate around the usefulness of neurodiversity cognitive assessments underscores the importance of approaching neurodiversity with caution and sensitivity. It is crucial to consider the individuality and complexity of each person’s neurodiverse profile and to tailor assessments and interventions accordingly.

Moving forward, researchers and practitioners must continue to explore ways to improve the validity and reliability of neurodiversity cognitive assessments. By incorporating diverse perspectives and experiences, we can develop more nuanced and inclusive assessment tools that truly support the needs of neurodiverse individuals.

In conclusion, the debate around the usefulness of neurodiversity cognitive assessments highlights the complexities and challenges of addressing neurodiversity in a meaningful and inclusive way. While these assessments have the potential to provide valuable insights and support, it is essential to approach them with sensitivity and a critical eye to ensure they truly benefit neurodiverse individuals.

Reference

  1. aetna – http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/600_699/0648.html
  2. cognassist – https://cognassist.com/insights-hub/science-behind-cognassist/
  3. mtholyoke – https://commons.mtholyoke.edu/theaccessibletoolbox/teaching-strategies-student-perspectives/working-with-neurodiverse-students/supporting-successful-statistics-learning-for-neurodiverse-students/
  4. hbr – https://hbr.org/2017/05/neurodiversity-as-a-competitive-advantage
  5. geniuswithin – https://www.geniuswithin.org/what-is-neurodiversity/
  6. globenewswire – https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/06/15/2463010/0/en/Cognitive-Assessment-Market-Size-2022-2027-Analysis-By-Business-Share-Strategies-Investment-Opportunities-Revenue-Expectation-Future-Trends-Prominent-Players-Covid-19-Impact-Analys.html
  7. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732033/
  8. spectrumnews – https://www.spectrumnews.org/features/deep-dive/the-blurred-line-between-autism-and-intellectual-disability/

Leave a Comment