Oklahoma Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Oklahoma Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Oklahoma reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Oklahoma Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start an Oklahoma LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Oklahoma Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Oklahoma Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 62 Oklahoma Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Oklahoma Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • Another 26% of the abortions were not recorded by the doctor’s specialty, and the number of medical professionals with hospital privileges was under-reported.[1]
  • As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[2]
  • They are not claiming that the margin of 51% to 45% is absolutely true; things like survey nonresponse and other factors might affect the outcome; at the very best, the anti-abortion side could get an opinion split that is almost equal.[3]
  • In actuality, most miscarriages happen before the 14th week of pregnancy, and over 90% of abortions happen before this week4.[4]
  • In that year, 54% of state-dwelling women aged 15 to 44 resided in counties where abortions were illegal.[5]
  • These figures show a 33% rise in clinics from 2014 when there were five establishments offering abortions, of which three were clinics.[2]
  • Since partisanship and pro-abortion opinions are modestly connected, adding 5% to the republican column may equate to adding 2% to the pro-abortion column, moving U.S.from 5,145 to 4,947. You can then take sample errors into account and do some more.[3]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with more than 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[2]
  • The number of abortions recorded increased by 41% from 75.4 in 20.2 to 78.4 in 2021, according to the Kansas Department of Health and Environments’ preliminary 2021 report on abortion data.[6]
  • In 2011, Kentucky was the state with the lowest percentage of adolescent pregnancies that resulted in abortions, at 15% or less. Oklahoma Dakota, South Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Utah, Indiana, and Texas.[4]
  • In Oklahoma, 75% of women who are less than 8 weeks pregnant seek an abortion, although that number declines as women become younger.[7]
  • Anti-abortion organizations refer to the dilation and evacuation process as “dismemberment,” which accounted for 6%.[6]
  • The Charlotte Lozier Institute CLI estimates that Oklahoma’s abortion rate declined by 24% to just 4.9 abortions per 1,000 women ages 15 to 44.[1]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, Oklahoma’s abortion rate decreased by 11%, from 7.0 to 6.2 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[2]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, residents from outside Oklahoma accounted for 81% of abortions conducted there.[8]
  • One potential factor is the pandemic-related delay of elective abortions, with the number of abortions carried out on March 2020 being 59% lower than in March 2019.[1]
  • According to statistics gathered between September 1 and December 31, planned parenthood clinics in these neighboring states reported a roughly 80% increase in texas patients seeking abortions last year compared to September 1 through December 31, 2020.[9]
  • In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. Of patients who had an abortion in 2014, one-third had to travel more than 25 miles one way to reach a facility.[2]
  • According to the statistics, 70% of abortions were done on unmarried girls and women, and 85% of them were carried out at less than nine weeks gestation.[6]
  • For states that didn’t offer data on race or ethnicity or had a high percentage of abortions where race or ethnicity was unclear, or missing in over 20% of instances, we didn’t make any estimations.[4]
  • According to the study, 65% of women had never previously had an abortion, dispelling the stereotype that many women utilize abortion as a method of birth control.[7]
  • When compared to the previous year, patients seeking abortions at planned parenthood health clinics in Oklahoma with texas zip codes increased by over 25%.[9]
  • But in 2020, 996 abortions were carried out by public organizations or in the course of a state employee’s work. 26% of all reported abortions in Oklahoma.[1]
  • The teen abortion ratio increased by at least 5% in five states.[4]
  • After 13 weeks of pregnancy, 24% of women aged 20 to 34 had abortions, compared to only 16% of women over the age of 35.[7]
  • 54% of the ultrasounds were carried out by the physician who performed the abortion, 2% by a different physician, and 44% by a third party.[1]
  • 6215 abortions occurred in the state in 2000; by 2020, that number will have decreased to 3,157, according to data from the Oklahoma State Department of Health.[10]
  • When compared to the prior year, there was a over 10% rise in texas zip code residents seeking abortions at planned parenthood clinics in New Mexico.[9]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[11]
  • According to this Pew Research summary, 51% in Oklahoma say abortion should be legal in all or most cases 46% agree it’s unlawful in all or most situations.[3]
  • In other circumstances, the abortion recipient’s race or ethnicity was absent in 20% or more of the cases.[4]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the United States in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[2]
  • Although Oklahoma is one of just six states that requires parents of a minor seeking an abortion to provide notarized permission, in 2012, teens accounted for 15% of all legal abortions done in Oklahoma.[12]
  • 39% of the women having abortions had no past live births, 24% had one prior live birth, and 36% had two or more prior births.[1]
  • Between 2000 and 2011, the teen abortion ratio and the proportion of teen pregnancies ending in abortion decreased by at least 5% in 35 states of Kansas, Wyoming, and Oklahoma, seeing drops of over 30%.[4]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[2]
  • Across three states, Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York abortion resulted from more than half of adolescent pregnancies in 2011—59%, 54%, and 51%, respectively, omitting miscarriages and stillbirths.[4]

Oklahoma Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • It has been shown that this program reduces the number of adolescent participants who start having sex by around 24%.[12]
  • For instance, according to statistics from 2017, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic adolescent girls were more than twice as likely to get pregnant as non-Hispanic white females.[13]
  • While Asian adolescents had the lowest teen birth rate among racial or ethnic groups at 23 births per 1,000, a 15% decrease from 2019, the rate among native Hawaiian or other Pacific islanders fell by 14% to 22.6 per 1,000.[14]
  • The adolescent birth rate in Alabama has significantly declined over the previous several decades, by around 63% since 1991.[15]
  • The adolescent birth rate in Oklahoma county fell by 42% between 2013 and 2018 because of targeted financing and efforts by dedicated groups.[13]
  • In Alabama, 74% of adolescent births occur to older youths ages 18 to 19, and 16% occur to minors who are already parents.[15]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[11]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[15]
  • With 25.7 births per 1,000, American, Indian or Alaska Native women and girls had the highest adolescent birth rate among racial or ethnic groups in 2020, a 12% decrease from 2019.[14]
  • The 3,504 adolescent births that had a place in Oklahoma in 14 are predicted to have cost 29.2 million in yearly savings.[13]
  • The general adolescent birth rate in the United States decreased by 23% between 2011 and 2014, and Oklahoma’s rate also decreased during that time.[12]
  • The 25.9% child poverty rate in New Mexico is a significant contributor to adolescent pregnancies.[15]
  • Due to their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 48 per 1,000 women.[15]
  • Only 50% of adolescent moms get a high school diploma before the age of 22, which is a substantial contribution to the high school dropout rates among women.[13]

Oklahoma Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • 23.5 per 1,000 Kentucky’s teen birth rate in 2020 was essentially unchanged from its rate of 24.4 in 2019, according to CDC researchers.[14]
  • According to one research, the biggest gap between black and white teenage pregnancy rates was in the first few years of adolescence and then declined by over 50% in the second.[13]
  • Six were recorded between weeks 11 and 12 of pregnancy, while fourteen were carried out between weeks nine and ten.[1]
  • 51% of all pregnancies in Oklahoma are reported by the women themselves as being unplanned when looking at women not just teenagers.[11]

Oklahoma Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • According to a 2017 peer-reviewed research, the typical timing of pregnancy awareness is about 55 weeks gestation.[7]

Oklahoma Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • Last but not least, the percentages of 20% and 10% are simply meant to be rough estimates based on the little information that is currently available on the frequency of fetal loss.[4]
  • In New Mexico, 81% of minors who gave birth in 2017 were Hispanic, as were 55.1% of female youths aged 15 to 19 who identify as Hispanic.[15]
  • According to research conducted in St. Louis, 36% of women missed days of work because they lacked the necessary menstrual hygiene products.[5]
  • In 2017, the state had an infant mortality rate of 77 deaths per 1,000 live births.[5]
  • Teen birth rates decreased by the state in 2020, with Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Montana seeing the largest decreases (19% in Montana).[14]
  • Of the approximately 61% who had previously given birth, 21% had two children and 13% had three or more.[7]

Also Read

How Useful is Oklahoma Abortion

Proponents of pro-life legislation argue that these measures are necessary to protect the sanctity of life and ensure that every unborn child has a chance at life. They argue that abortion is a moral wrong, and that it should be restricted as much as possible. By implementing measures such as waiting periods, mandatory counseling, and parental consent requirements, they hope to dissuade women from choosing abortion and instead encourage them to consider alternative options such as adoption.

On the other hand, opponents of such legislation argue that these restrictions are unnecessary and intrusive, and that they serve only to limit women’s access to safe and legal abortion services. They argue that abortion is a deeply personal and difficult decision, and that women should have the right to make that decision for themselves without interference from the government. By imposing barriers to access, they argue, these laws only serve to further stigmatize and marginalize women who are already facing difficult circumstances.

So the question remains: how useful are these Oklahoma abortion laws in achieving their intended goals? Do they truly reduce the number of abortions performed, or do they simply make it more difficult for women to access the care they need? And are there unintended consequences to these measures that may actually do more harm than good?

It is clear that there are deeply held beliefs on both sides of the abortion debate, and that finding common ground may be challenging. However, it is important to consider the potential impact of these laws on those who may be most affected by them – namely, the women who are already facing difficult and often traumatic circumstances.

It is important to remember that decisions about abortion are not made lightly, and that women who choose to terminate a pregnancy do so for a variety of reasons. Imposing unnecessary barriers to access only serves to further stigmatize and isolate these women, and may push them towards unsafe or illegal methods of terminating a pregnancy.

In the end, the usefulness of Oklahoma’s abortion laws must be evaluated based on their impact on those who are most affected by them. Are these laws truly helping women to make informed decisions about their reproductive health, or are they simply serving to limit their options and increase their burdens? It is important to consider these questions as we continue to debate the issue of abortion in our society.


  1. lozierinstitute – https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-oklahoma-2020/
  2. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-oklahoma
  3. columbia – https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2022/05/20/abortion-attitudes-in-oklahoma/
  4. guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/report/us-teen-pregnancy-state-trends-2011
  5. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Oklahoma
  6. cjonline – https://www.cjonline.com/story/news/politics/2022/04/27/kansas-abortions-increase-despite-fewer-texas-oklahoma-patients-2021/9543419002/
  7. tulsaworld – https://tulsaworld.com/opinion/columnists/ginnie-graham-finding-out-the-reasons-why-women-in-oklahoma-get-abortions/article_4678422c-5774-11ec-9cf0-e7ae3a88cee0.html
  8. abort73 – https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/oklahoma/
  9. plannedparenthood – https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/new-planned-parenthood-data-highlight-the-far-reaching-impact-of-texas-abortion-ban
  10. tulsaworld – https://tulsaworld.com/news/state-and-regional/oklahoma-city-abortion-clinic-sees-caseload-double-after-texas-law-takes-effect/article_f967e386-1d4c-11ec-a0d7-3b7232634b6b.html
  11. powertodecide – https://powertodecide.org/what-we-do/information/national-state-data/oklahoma
  12. okpolicy – https://okpolicy.org/oklahomas-teen-birth-rate-near-highest-country-can-better/
  13. biomedcentral – https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-12482-1
  14. usnews – https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/slideshows/states-with-the-highest-teen-birth-rates
  15. worldpopulationreview – https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/teen-pregnancy-rates-by-state
  16. oklahoma – https://oklahoma.gov/health/health-education/children—family-health/maternal-and-child-health-service/child-and-adolescent-health/adolescent-health/teen-pregnancy-prevention-and-sexual-health.html

Leave a Comment