Online Proctoring Statistics


Steve Bennett
Steve Bennett
Business Formation Expert
Steve runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Online Proctoring Statistics 2023: Facts about Online Proctoring outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Online Proctoring, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Online Proctoring Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Online Proctoring Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 15 Online Proctoring Statistics on this page 🙂

Online Proctoring “Latest” Statistics

  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[1]
  • According to a survey done in May by the publishing and digital education company Wiley, 93% of instructors believe that students are more inclined to cheat online than in person.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[2]
  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[2]
  • For using “tutor-provided solutions” to exam problems from Chegg, more than 200 of the 800 students in a single Statistics 311 class at North Carolina State were recommended for disciplinary action, according to Tyler Johnson, the course coordinator.[2]
  • According to a 2011 research by Ambient Insight Research, 10.65 million students in higher education attended some of their courses online at the time, while 1.25 million students completed all of their courses online (Adkins, 2011).[3]
  • Proctor usage has increased by up to 500% in companies, and there are growing valid worries about their intrusiveness, potential bias, and efficacy.[4]
  • Concerns about online proctors prompted a U.S. Proctorio, ProctorU, and ExamSoft, three of the main proctoring companies that have together presided over at least 30 million exams during the pandemic, were asked for more information in a letter of inquiry from the Senate.[4]
  • Many students taking online courses now take tens of thousands of online exams each month, including an increasing number of students taking face-to-face classes (30,000 exams at Western Governors University alone).[5]
  • According to industry insiders, there are now at least 15 online proctoring companies, more than twice as many as there were just five years ago.[5]
  • Between 30,000 and 40,000 tests are proctored online each year at the 17 campuses of UNC.[5]
  • Over 12,000 tests are proctored online each month at NOVA, where 23,000 students enroll in online courses.[5]
  • The 6,000 full-time students at CSU Channel Islands take 5 to 7 percent of their classes online, but all of their tests are proctored in person, according to Leafstedt.[5]
  • 26 percent of the universities reported using online proctoring services that didn’t adhere to their accessibility guidelines.[6]

Also Read

How Useful is Online Proctoring

One of the primary benefits of online proctoring is its convenience. With the rise of online education and the increasing demand for remote learning options, proctoring exams online provides a practical solution for both students and instructors. Students no longer have to travel to a physical location to take an exam, saving time and money. Instructors can also administer exams more efficiently, as they no longer have to worry about logistics such as finding a suitable testing location or coordinating proctors.

Another advantage of online proctoring is its ability to maintain exam security. By monitoring students through a webcam, online proctoring services can detect suspicious behavior and alert instructors to potential cheating. This helps ensure the integrity of exams and gives instructors peace of mind knowing that their students are taking the tests honestly.

Online proctoring also offers added flexibility for students. They can take exams at a time and place that is convenient for them, rather than being constrained by a specific testing schedule. This can be especially helpful for students who have busy schedules or face barriers to attending in-person exams, such as transportation issues or disabilities.

However, despite these advantages, online proctoring does come with its share of limitations and challenges. One of the main concerns raised about online proctoring is the invasion of privacy. Students may feel uncomfortable being monitored through a webcam during an exam, especially if they are in a private space such as their home. This can lead to feelings of distrust and unease, potentially affecting a student’s performance on the exam.

Additionally, online proctoring is not foolproof. While it may deter some forms of cheating, tech-savvy students may still find ways to exploit the system. Methods such as using multiple devices or software to bypass the proctoring software have been known to occur, raising questions about the effectiveness of online proctoring in preventing cheating.

Another challenge of online proctoring is the potential for technical issues to arise during an exam. Poor internet connection, software glitches, and other technical difficulties can disrupt the exam process and create unnecessary stress for students. In some cases, students may even be unfairly penalized for issues that are beyond their control, such as a sudden loss of internet connection.

In conclusion, while online proctoring can offer some benefits in terms of convenience and exam security, it is not without its limitations. Privacy concerns, technical issues, and the potential for cheating still remain as challenges to be addressed. It is important for institutions and educators to carefully consider the pros and cons of online proctoring and weigh them against alternative exam invigilation methods. Only then can we truly determine how useful online proctoring is in practice and whether it is the best solution for maintaining academic integrity in a digital learning environment.

Reference

  1. educause – https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/2/proctoring-software-in-higher-ed-prevalence-and-patterns
  2. hechingerreport – https://hechingerreport.org/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-cheating/
  3. umn – https://open.lib.umn.edu/innovativeteaching/chapter/under-the-watchful-eye-of-online-proctoring/
  4. eff – https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/long-overdue-reckoning-online-proctoring-companies-may-finally-be-here
  5. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/05/10/online-exam-proctoring-catches-cheaters-raises-concerns
  6. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/11/online-proctoring-surging-during-covid-19

Leave a Comment