Online Proctoring Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Online Proctoring Statistics 2023: Facts about Online Proctoring outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Online Proctoring, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Online Proctoring Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Online Proctoring Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 15 Online Proctoring Statistics on this page 🙂

Online Proctoring “Latest” Statistics

  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[1]
  • According to a survey done in May by the publishing and digital education company Wiley, 93% of instructors believe that students are more inclined to cheat online than in person.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[2]
  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[2]
  • For using “tutor-provided solutions” to exam problems from Chegg, more than 200 of the 800 students in a single Statistics 311 class at North Carolina State were recommended for disciplinary action, according to Tyler Johnson, the course coordinator.[2]
  • According to a 2011 research by Ambient Insight Research, 10.65 million students in higher education attended some of their courses online at the time, while 1.25 million students completed all of their courses online (Adkins, 2011).[3]
  • Proctor usage has increased by up to 500% in companies, and there are growing valid worries about their intrusiveness, potential bias, and efficacy.[4]
  • Concerns about online proctors prompted a U.S. Proctorio, ProctorU, and ExamSoft, three of the main proctoring companies that have together presided over at least 30 million exams during the pandemic, were asked for more information in a letter of inquiry from the Senate.[4]
  • Many students taking online courses now take tens of thousands of online exams each month, including an increasing number of students taking face-to-face classes (30,000 exams at Western Governors University alone).[5]
  • According to industry insiders, there are now at least 15 online proctoring companies, more than twice as many as there were just five years ago.[5]
  • Between 30,000 and 40,000 tests are proctored online each year at the 17 campuses of UNC.[5]
  • Over 12,000 tests are proctored online each month at NOVA, where 23,000 students enroll in online courses.[5]
  • The 6,000 full-time students at CSU Channel Islands take 5 to 7 percent of their classes online, but all of their tests are proctored in person, according to Leafstedt.[5]
  • 26 percent of the universities reported using online proctoring services that didn’t adhere to their accessibility guidelines.[6]

Also Read

How Useful is Online Proctoring

On the surface, online proctoring seems like a convenient solution to a pressing problem. It allows students to take exams from the comfort of their own homes while still ensuring that they are not able to cheat or plagiarize. Proctoring software can detect unusual behavior such as looking away from the screen, talking to someone off-camera, or attempting to access other websites during the exam. In theory, this should help to maintain a level playing field and ensure that students are evaluated solely on their own merits.

Proponents of online proctoring argue that it provides a much-needed layer of security for online exams. With the increasing prevalence of online education, it is essential to have mechanisms in place to prevent cheating and protect the integrity of academic credentials. Online proctoring offers a way to do this without requiring students to travel to a physical testing center or incur additional costs.

However, there are many critics of online proctoring who question its effectiveness and raise concerns about privacy and fairness. Some argue that online proctoring software is prone to errors and can flag innocent behavior as suspicious. For example, a student who looks away from the screen to think or takes a bathroom break during the exam may be flagged as cheating, leading to an unjust accusation. This can be especially problematic for students who have disabilities or other limitations that make it difficult for them to sit still for long periods of time.

Moreover, online proctoring raises serious privacy concerns for many students. In order to monitor exams effectively, proctoring software often requires access to students’ webcams, microphones, and even their browsing history. This invasive level of surveillance can be off-putting for students who value their privacy and feel uncomfortable being constantly monitored while taking an exam.

Another issue with online proctoring is that it may not always be effective at preventing cheating. While proctoring software can detect some forms of academic dishonesty, it is not foolproof and can be circumvented by tech-savvy students. For example, students may use secondary devices or hidden earpieces to communicate with someone off-camera during the exam, making it difficult for the proctoring software to detect foul play.

While online proctoring can provide a convenient way to monitor student exams and prevent cheating, its effectiveness and impact on student privacy and fairness are still up for debate. As online education continues to grow in popularity, it is important for educators and administrators to carefully consider the pros and cons of online proctoring and ensure that it is being used in a way that is fair and respectful of students’ rights.

Reference

  1. educause – https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/2/proctoring-software-in-higher-ed-prevalence-and-patterns
  2. hechingerreport – https://hechingerreport.org/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-cheating/
  3. umn – https://open.lib.umn.edu/innovativeteaching/chapter/under-the-watchful-eye-of-online-proctoring/
  4. eff – https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/long-overdue-reckoning-online-proctoring-companies-may-finally-be-here
  5. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/05/10/online-exam-proctoring-catches-cheaters-raises-concerns
  6. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/11/online-proctoring-surging-during-covid-19

Leave a Comment