Pennsylvania Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Pennsylvania Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Pennsylvania reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Pennsylvania Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Pennsylvania LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Pennsylvania Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Pennsylvania Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 76 Pennsylvania Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Pennsylvania Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • According to the Guttmacher Institute, Pennsylvania, a state that allows abortions up to 24 weeks of pregnancy, has experienced a slight decline in its rate over the last several years.[1]
  • A percentage based on 539,573 abortions was reported overall from the regions that complied with the requirements for reporting the quantity of prior induced abortions.[2]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, Pennsylvania’s abortion rate dropped by 1%, from 13.3 to 13.1 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[3]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data indicate that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased by 51% and that this study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[2]
  • According to the Guttmacher Institute, around 85% of Pennsylvania counties don’t have any health facilities that provide abortions as of 2017.[1]
  • Among the 42 areas that reported by marital status for 2019, 14.5% of women who obtained an abortion were married and 85.5% were unmarried table 7.[2]
  • Women with one previous live birth received over 25% of the abortions, while women with two or more live births received 37% of the abortions.[4]
  • The number of abortions rose by 2% from 2018 to 2019. The abortion rate increased by 0.9% and the abortion ratio increased by 3%.[2]
  • At 7-9 weeks of gestation, 52.2% of abortions were surgical. 93.2% of abortions during 10-13 weeks of pregnancy 96.9%-99.2% of abortions at 14-20 weeks of pregnancy and 87.0% at 21 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • First-trimester abortions were responsible for 84% of problems, second-trimester abortions for 13%, and abortions between 21 and 23 weeks of gestation for 6% of the complications.[5]
  • At 14-20 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10% fewer abortions were carried out.[2]
  • The proportion of abortions carried out at 13 weeks of gestation remained low during 2010–2019 at 90%.[2]
  • Contrarily, adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2 and 3.7%, respectively.[2]
  • The greatest abortion rates were found in the age groups 20-24 and 25-29, with 19.0 and 18.6 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively, and the highest percentages of abortions (27.6% and 29.3%, respectively).[2]
  • In these 35 locations, the rate of early medical abortion grew by 10% between 2018 and 2019, from 37.5% to 41.1%, and by 12.3% between 2010 and 2019, from 18.4% to 41.1% .[2]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • Early in the second trimester, between 13 and 14 weeks, 5% of the abortions were carried out. Between 15 and 17 weeks, 4% of the abortions were carried out.[5]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[3]
  • In this study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[2]
  • In a 2014 pew research center survey of Pennsylvania people, 51% answered that abortion should be permitted, while 44% stated that it should be prohibited in all or most circumstances.[6]
  • Around 19% of all abortions in the united states were done in these states in 2017, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Guttmacher Institute’s nationwide survey of abortion.[2]
  • As a consequence, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[3]
  • Among the 34 reporting areas that provided data every year on gestational age from 2010 to 2019, the percentage of abortions performed at 13 weeks gestation changed negligibly from 91.9% to 92% table 11.[2]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[7]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, out-of-state persons underwent 72% of the abortions carried out in Pennsylvania.[8]
  • Abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy varied very little by race and ethnicity, with 78% of non-hispanic black women having abortions as opposed to 61%-77% of women from other racial and ethnic groups.[2]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three-quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[2]
  • Except for 6 weeks gestation, surgical abortion accounted for the highest proportion of abortions among the 42 locations that reported them for 2019, broken down by specific weeks of pregnancy and procedure type.[2]
  • The age categories had a decline in abortion rates from 2010 to 2019, although teenagers experienced the largest declines—by 60% and 50%, respectively—among all older age groups.[2]
  • The Department of Health data reveals that in 2018, there were 2,124 abortions performed on inhabitants of other states, territories, and other countries.[9]
  • The majority of abortions occurred at 9 weeks gestation in each category for these parameters.[2]
  • From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of all abortions by early medical abortion climbed by 12.3% among regions that reported by technique type and included medical abortion in their reporting form.[2]
  • The number of abortionists has been steadily declining. 2017 saw a 10% decrease in the number of facilities providing abortion in Pennsylvania.[9]
  • In the 43 regions that provided information on gestational age at the time of abortion for 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out at 9 weeks, and almost all (92.7%).[2]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[3]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the united states in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[3]
  • These abortions, which totaled 625,346, were from 48 reporting locations that submitted data yearly between 2010 and 2019.[2]
  • In 2018, 54% of abortions in Pennsylvania were performed using the suction curettage technique.[5]
  • In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. 1 one third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[3]
  • The total number of recorded abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio declined by 18% (from 762,755), between 2010 and 2019. 21% from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years and 13% from 22.5 abortions per 1,000 live births, respectively.[2]
  • In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out during 9 weeks gestation, and 92.7% were carried out at 13 weeks.[2]
  • However, further technological developments, such as enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy testing, have made it possible to execute extremely early surgical abortions with success rates surpassing 97%.[2]
  • The overall number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions hit record lows in 2017, and then all indicators saw rises between 2017 and 2018 of 1% to 2%.[2]
  • Retained products of conception accounted for 82% of the problems, with chemical abortions responsible for 66% of the instances of retained products.[4]
  • 76.2% of non-Hispanic black women in 29 reporting regions had abortions at 9 weeks of pregnancy, compared to 80.6%-82.4% of women in other racial and ethnic groupings.[2]
  • According to research done in the United States in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[2]
  • Similarly, the discovery of early medical abortion regimens has made it possible to execute abortions at an early stage of pregnancy. Completion rates for these regimens, which include mifepristone and misoprostol, have reached 96%-98%.[2]
  • For these 48 reporting locations, the percentage change in abortion measures from the recent past year 2018 to 2019, and for the 10 years of study 2010 to 2019, were computed.[2]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68% 75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[2]
  • At 1420 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10% fewer abortions were carried out.[2]
  • Most abortions occurred at 9 weeks gestation in each category for these parameters.[2]
  • According to research done in the united states in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[2]

Pennsylvania Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • In remote places, there is little information available on adolescent pregnancy and childbirth. Although 20% of the country’s adolescents reside in rural regions (loda et al.).[10]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[11]
  • With 25.7 births per 1,000, American Indian or Alaska Native women and girls had the highest adolescent birth rate among racial or ethnic groups in 2020, a 12% decrease from 2019.[12]
  • A closer look at those figures reveals that reading is the location of two-thirds of such pregnancies and that around 75% of adolescent moms are Hispanic.[13]
  • While Asian adolescents had the lowest teen birth rate among racial or ethnic groups at 23 births per 1,000, a 15% decrease from 2019, the rate among native Hawaiian or other Pacific islanders fell by 14% to 22.6 per 1,000.[12]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[7]
  • County wellness received funds from the community foundation a few years ago to embark on an ambitious effort to reduce the county’s adolescent pregnancy rate by 40% by 2022.[13]
  • While adolescent pregnancy rates have decreased by roughly 32% nationally in Pennsylvania, they have decreased by an astounding 43% in reading, which has resulted in a 28% decrease in teen pregnancy rates throughout berks county.[13]
  • The teen birth rate in Kentucky is 23.8 per 1,000, according to CDC analysts, Kentucky’s adolescent birth rate in 2020 remained almost steady from its rate of 24.9 in 2019.[12]

Pennsylvania Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • The teen birth rate in Pennsylvania has decreased by 72% from 1991 to 2019. However, disparities remain among racial and ethnic minorities deciding power.[14]
  • According to Obijuru et al., for instance, 35% of teenagers used condoms whereas just 3% of them utilized implants as contraception.[14]
  • In 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, teen pregnancies and births cost Pennsylvania taxpayers about 409 million dollars.[15]
  • 53% of all pregnancies in Pennsylvania, not only among teenagers, are reported by women as being unplanned.[7]

Pennsylvania Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • Smoking during pregnancy fell by 31% between 2014 and 2019, from 13.7% to 95% of live births.[11]
  • The unintended pregnancy percentage of women with a recent live birth women’s sleep health is 31.6%.[11]

Pennsylvania Abortion “Gestation” Statistics

  • Between nine and ten weeks of gestation, 17% of procedures were carried out, and 8% between eleven and twelve weeks.[5]

Pennsylvania Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • 46%% of recent live births among women who experienced intimate partner violence before becoming pregnant.[11]
  • Young girls who practice fundamentalist faiths have their first sexual encounters later in life, but they are far less likely to utilize contraception then. In brewster et al.[10]
  • In 40.2%, 24.5%, and 20% of the 45 regions that reported the number of prior live births in 2019, 92% and 60% of women had zero, one, two, three, or four or more previous live births.[2]
  • Sixty-two already had children, with 26% having had a live birth before and 36% having had two or more.[5]
  • Teen birth rates decreased by the state in 2020, with Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Montana seeing the largest decreases (19% in Montana).[12]
  • According to research conducted in St. Louis, 36% of women missed days of work because they lacked the necessary menstrual hygiene products.[6]
  • Abortions performed on Lancaster county inhabitants climbed by 15%, and by 24% for Lebanon county residents.[16]
  • As proxies for general neighborhood conditions, the percentage of immediately unsafe structures and the percentage of unoccupied residences per block group stated in this database in 2001 were employed.[17]

Also Read

How Useful is Pennsylvania Abortion

One of the key factors in the discussion surrounding Pennsylvania abortion is the question of how useful it is. Many anti-abortion advocates argue that abortion is not a necessary or useful procedure, and that there are alternative options available to individuals facing unplanned pregnancies. They believe that abortion is ultimately harmful to both individuals and society as a whole, promoting a culture that devalues human life.

On the other hand, those who support abortion rights argue that it is a critical and useful option for individuals who find themselves in difficult or dangerous situations. They believe that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health without government interference. They argue that access to safe and legal abortion services is essential for women’s health, safety, and autonomy.

It is important to consider the different perspectives on the usefulness of Pennsylvania abortion in order to have a well-rounded understanding of the issue. While some may believe that abortion is not necessary, it is crucial to acknowledge that individuals facing unplanned pregnancies may have unique circumstances that make abortion the best option for them. Forcing individuals to carry pregnancies to term against their will can have serious consequences for their physical and mental health, as well as their overall well-being.

Additionally, the debate over the usefulness of Pennsylvania abortion raises important questions about reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. Should individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies, or should the government have the authority to dictate what individuals can and cannot do with their own bodies? These are complex and deeply personal questions that go to the heart of the debate over abortion.

In the end, the question of how useful Pennsylvania abortion is ultimately comes down to individual circumstances and beliefs. It is important for individuals to have access to accurate information and resources in order to make informed decisions about their reproductive health. Providing comprehensive sex education, affordable contraception, and access to abortion services can help individuals avoid unintended pregnancies and make choices that are right for them.

Regardless of one’s beliefs about the usefulness of Pennsylvania abortion, it is clear that this issue is deeply personal and multifaceted. It is important to approach the debate with empathy, understanding, and respect for the diverse perspectives and experiences of individuals who may be affected by these decisions.


  1. axios –
  2. cdc –
  3. guttmacher –
  4. lozierinstitute –
  5. lozierinstitute –
  6. wikipedia –
  7. powertodecide –
  8. abort73 –
  9. witf –
  10. nih –
  11. americashealthrankings –
  12. usnews –
  13. bccf –
  14. sciencedirect –
  15. chop –
  16. alignlifeministries –
  17. nih –
  18. johnstonsarchive –
  19. pewresearch –

Leave a Comment