South Dakota Abortion Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

South Dakota Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in South Dakota reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.


LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on South Dakota Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a South Dakota LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will South Dakota Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top South Dakota Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 86 South Dakota Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

South Dakota Abortion “Latest” Statistics

  • Estimates of miscarriage rates and reported adolescent birth and abortion rates are used to compute teen pregnancy rates.[1]
  • States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.[2]
  • 2008 saw the repeal of an anti-abortion legislation enacted earlier that year that would have limited abortion to situations involving rape, incest, and the woman’s health by a vote of 55%.[3]
  • However, data from health authorities in nearby states show that over 450 South Dakota women went to another state last year to have an abortion, a significant increase over the number of women who do so in a regular year.[4]
  • According to research done in the United States in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[5]
  • At 14-20 weeks of gestation, 62%, and at 21 weeks of gestation, 10%, fewer abortions were carried out.[5]
  • A percentage based on 539,573 abortions was reported overall from the regions that complied with the requirements for reporting the quantity of prior induced abortions.[5]
  • The proportion of abortions carried out at 13 weeks of gestation remained low during 2010–2019 at 90%.[5]
  • An IHS clinic in the U.S. only conducted 25 abortions between 1976 and 2002, according to research by the Yankton Sioux Reservation-based Native American Women’s health education resource center.[4]
  • At 7-9 weeks of gestation, 52.2% of abortions were surgical. 93.2% of abortions during 1013 weeks of pregnancy 96.9%-99.2% of abortions at 14-20 weeks gestation and 87% of abortions at 21 weeks gestation.[5]
  • From 2010 to 2019, national birth data indicate that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased by 51% 30 and that this study’s findings show a 50% reduction in the abortion rate for the same age group.[5]
  • Twelve procedures were carried out on women who had over one prior abortion, whereas twenty-two were on women who had had one.[6]
  • However, further technological developments, such as enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy testing, have made it possible to execute extremely early surgical abortions with success rates surpassing 97%.[5]
  • The number of abortions conducted in South Dakota decreased from around 40.0 in 20.1 to 12.5 in 2020, according to data analyzed by news watch.[4]
  • 14% of abortions were reported to have happened at six weeks or fewer of gestation, and 27% were between seven and eight weeks.[6]
  • As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.[2]
  • According to the Guttmacher Institute, South Dakota is one of 10 states having trigger legislation that would virtually instantly outlaw abortions if the 1973 ruling is overturned.[4]
  • From 21% in 2006 to 44% in 2016, the percentage of women who claim to have had an abortion due to financial reasons has significantly climbed over the last several years.[4]
  • The overall number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions hit record lows in 2017, and then all indicators saw rises between 2017 and 2018 of 1% to 2%.[5]
  • Except for 6 weeks gestation, surgical abortion accounted for the highest proportion of abortions among the 42 locations that reported them for 2019, broken down by specific weeks of pregnancy and procedure type.[5]
  • These abortions, which totaled 625,346, were from 48 reporting locations that submitted data yearly between 2010 and 2019.[5]
  • Abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy varied very little by race and ethnicity, with 78% of non-Hispanic black women having abortions as opposed to 61% and 77% of women from other racial and ethnic groups.[5]
  • In this study, teens aged 19 who had abortions at 13 weeks gestation were more likely to do so than older age groups to have abortions.[5]
  • The total number of recorded abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio declined by 18% from 762,755 between 2010 and 2019. 21% from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years and 13% from 22.5 abortions per 1,000 live births, respectively.[5]
  • In 2017, some 98% of South Dakota counties had no clinics that provided abortions and 76% of South Dakota women lived in those counties.[2]
  • Twenty-eight abortions in South Dakota were carried out between nine and ten weeks gestation, 19% between eleven and twelve weeks, and 11% at thirteen weeks or beyond.[6]
  • Throughout the previous ten years, around three-quarters of abortions were carried out at nine weeks of gestation; this ratio rose from 74.8% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2019.[5]
  • Similarly, the discovery of early medical abortion regimens has made it possible to execute abortions at an early stage of pregnancy. Completion rates for these regimens, which include mifepristone and misoprostol, have reached 96%-98%.[5]
  • The lowest rates of abortion—0.4 and 2.7 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 40—were seen in age groups that made up 20% and 37% of all abortions.[5]
  • 76.2% of non-Hispanic black women in 29 reporting regions had abortions at 9 weeks of pregnancy, compared to 80.6%-82.4% of women in other racial and ethnic groupings.[5]
  • According to data recorded by Kromenaker, 37 minors, or 3% of all patients treated in 2021, requested abortions.[7]
  • In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. One-third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.[2]
  • From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of all abortions by early medical abortion climbed by 12.3% among regions that reported by technique type and included medical abortion in their reporting form.[5]
  • The age categories had a decline in abortion rates from 2010 to 2019, although teenagers experienced the largest declines—by 60% and 50%, respectively—among all older age groups.[5]
  • In the 43 regions that provided information on gestational age at the time of abortion for 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out at 9 weeks, and almost all (92.7%).[5]
  • Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.[8]
  • In the 42 districts where data on marital status was given for 2019, 14.5% of women who had abortions were married and 85.5 % were single.[5]
  • Between 2014 and 2017, South Dakota’s abortion rate decreased by 10%, from 3.5 to 3.1 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.[2]
  • Around 19% of all abortions in the United States were done in these states in 2017, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Guttmacher Institute’s nationwide survey of abortion.[5]
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19.8% of the abortions carried out in South Dakota were out-of.[9]
  • The proportion of abortions conducted at 13 weeks gestation increased a little from 91.9% to 92% among the 34 reporting locations that reported data on gestational age per year for 2010–2019.[5]
  • Only 125 abortions were recorded in South Dakota in 2020, a record low for the state and a 70% decrease from 2019.[6]
  • In these 35 locations, the rate of early medical abortion grew by 10% between 2018 and 2019, from 37.5% to 41.1%, and by 12.3% between 2010 and 2019, from 18.4% to 41.1%.[5]
  • Suction abortions accounted for 58% of the abortions recorded in South Dakota in 2020, while chemical abortions accounted for 39%.[6]
  • The greatest abortion rates were found in the age groups 20-24 and 25-29, with 19.0 and 18.6 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively, and the highest percentages of abortions (27.6% and 29.3%, respectively).[5]
  • According to the Guttmacher Institute, the foremost institution for collecting statistics on abortion, more abortion restriction legislation has been passed nationally in 2021 than in any year since Roe v Wade.[4]
  • In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, while private doctors’ offices made up 16%.[2]
  • In South Dakota, 35% of abortions were performed on women who had no live children, 25% were performed on women who had one child, and 40% were performed on women who had two or more children.[6]
  • The number of abortions rose by 2% from 2018 to 2019. Both the abortion rate and ratio rose by 3% and 9%, respectively.[5]
  • The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age resided in states that restrict access to abortion.[10]
  • Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the United States in 2017. This is a 5% drop.[2]
  • Most abortions occurred at 9 weeks gestation in each category for these parameters.[5]
  • In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were carried out during 9 weeks gestation, and 92.7% were carried out at 13 weeks.[5]
  • For these 48 reporting locations, the percentage change in abortion measures from the past year, 2018 to 2019, and for the 10 years of study 2010 to 2019, were computed.[5]
  • According to a leaked draft judgment from the U.S. Supreme Court released on May 2, a modification to the historic 1973 ruling establishing a constitutional right to abortion looks inevitable.[7]
  • 91% of patients getting abortions at the clinic, according to Kromenaker, are at 12 weeks or fewer of pregnancy.[7]
  • Women in their thirties underwent an extra 30% of abortions in South Dakota, while women aged 40 or older had 3% of abortions.[6]
  • The number of pregnancies in North Dakota is increasing, despite the static abortion rates, and as a result, the percentage of pregnancies that end in abortion has decreased to 7%.[7]
  • One unspecified abortion-related complication was reported in 85% of abortions performed on unpaid patients.[6]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68%-75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[5]
  • Contrarily, adolescents under the age of 15 and women over the age of 40 had the lowest abortion rates—0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women, respectively—and made up the lowest percentages of abortions, 0.2% and 3.7%, respectively.[5]
  • Contrarily, compared to 68% 75% of women in older age groups, 19.8% of adolescents aged 15 and 9.6% of those aged 15 to 19 years had an abortion after 13 weeks of pregnancy.[5]
  • According to research done in the united states in the 1970s, surgical abortion operations carried out between 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks gestation were less likely to successfully end the pregnancy.[5]

South Dakota Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

  • There was no connection between abstinence instruction and the statewide adolescent education % of high school graduates who took the seat in 2005–2006.[1]
  • Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1,000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.[8]
  • For those reasons alone, South Dakota should not be content with a 39% yearly decline in the number of adolescent pregnancies.[11]
  • About 19% of adolescent births in West Virginia are to minors who are already parents, and about 79% of teen births there are to older youths 18 or 19 years old.[12]
  • The 25.9% child poverty rate in New Mexico is a significant contributor to adolescent pregnancies.[12]
  • Because of their location in rural regions, several counties in West Virginia have extraordinarily high adolescent birth rates of up to 4.8 per 1,000 women.[12]
  • 23,209 adolescent births cost South Dakota taxpayers 500 million between 1991 and 2010, according to the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.[11]
  • Since reaching a high in 1991, South Dakota’s yearly adolescent birth rate has decreased by 39%, according to a study this month from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics.[11]
  • In Alabama, 74% of adolescent births occur to older youths ages 18 to 19, and 16% occur to minors who are already parents.[12]
  • Since its launch in 2009, Colorado’s family planning initiative has increased the use of LARC to prevent unintended pregnancies, and between 2009 and 2012, it lowered the adolescent birth rate by 5%.[13]
  • The adolescent birth rate in Alabama has significantly declined over the previous several decades, by around 63% since 1991.[12]

South Dakota Abortion “Teen” Statistics

  • 44% of all pregnancies in North Dakota, not only among teenagers, are reported by women as being unplanned.[14]
  • A recent study 34 that showed that teenage moms are more likely to drop out of school lends evidence to this. 51% of teen mothers earned their high school diploma by age 22 compared to 89% of women who had not given birth as teens.[1]
  • For example, a recent study 49 attributes 52% of all unintended pregnancies by teenagers and adults in the U.S. to nonuse of contraception 43% are because of inconsistent or improper usage, whereas just 5% are because of technique failure.[1]

South Dakota Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

  • The development of long-acting reproductive contraceptives has significantly reduced the number of those unexpected births in a state where the unwanted pregnancy rate is 46% for all age groups, she added.[11]

South Dakota Abortion “Other” Statistics

  • In New Mexico, 81% of minors who gave birth in 2017 were Hispanic, as were 55.1% of female youths aged 15 to 19 who identify as Hispanic.[12]
  • In 40.2%, 24.5%., and 20% of the 45 regions that reported the number of prior live births in 2019, 92% and 60% of women had zero, one, two, three, or four or more previous live births.[5]
  • Data for 1993 show that South Dakota’s birth rate is dropping, with a 3% drop in births since 1990 and an 18% drop since 1980.[15]
  • The sleep position percentage of women with a recent live birth is 86.6% youth smoking and tobacco use.[13]
  • South Dakota is well behind California in terms of % drop, coming in at just 48th place out of 50 states.[11]
  • Measures South Dakota 2021 health of woman’s Infant Mortality rose by 11% from 6.1 to 6.8 deaths per 1,000 live births during 2015–2016 and 2017–2018.[13]
  • Teen births decreased by 35% from 29.6 to 19.2 births per 1,000 females ages 15-19 between 2013 and 2019 women aged 18–44 who were physically inactive rose by 59% during 2016–2017 and 2018–2019, from 12.4% to 19.7%.[13]
  • Abortion results in the death of 19% of unborn children. 24 babies weighed less than 100 grams and six-eight babies weighed 100 grams or more.[6]

Also Read

How Useful is South Dakota Abortion

Proponents of South Dakota’s abortion laws argue that they are necessary to protect the rights of unborn children and uphold moral values. They believe that by restricting access to abortion, the state is effectively safeguarding the sanctity of life and preventing potential harm to both the fetus and the mother. Additionally, some argue that these laws protect women from making hasty or uninformed decisions that they may later regret.

However, critics of South Dakota’s abortion laws argue that they are overly restrictive and ultimately harmful to women’s health and rights. These critics believe that the laws infringe upon a woman’s autonomy and right to make decisions about her own body. By limiting access to abortion services, critics argue that the state is essentially forcing women to either travel long distances to access care or resort to unsafe and illegal methods to terminate a pregnancy.

Furthermore, opponents of South Dakota’s abortion laws argue that the restrictions disproportionately affect low-income women and individuals living in rural areas. By limiting access to abortion services, these laws effectively place a significant burden on those who may not have the financial means or resources to travel to a different state for care. This can result in delays in seeking treatment, which can have serious implications for both the physical and mental health of the individual seeking an abortion.

Ultimately, the usefulness of South Dakota’s abortion laws in terms of serving the public good depends on one’s perspective. For those who believe strongly in the protection of unborn children and the sanctity of life, these laws may be seen as a crucial step in upholding these values. However, for those who prioritize women’s rights and autonomy, these laws may be viewed as harmful and oppressive.

It is essential that we continue to have open and honest conversations about abortion laws and their impact on individuals and society as a whole. By considering the perspectives of all stakeholders involved, we can work towards finding a balance that respects the diverse values and beliefs held by different individuals and communities. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that everyone has access to safe and comprehensive reproductive healthcare services, regardless of where they live or their personal beliefs.


  1. nih –
  2. guttmacher –
  3. wikipedia –
  4. sdnewswatch –
  5. cdc –
  6. lozierinstitute –
  7. inforum –
  8. powertodecide –
  9. abort73 –
  10. politico –
  11. argusleader –
  12. worldpopulationreview –
  13. americashealthrankings –
  14. powertodecide –
  15. nih –
  16. sd –
  17. ufhealth –
  18. pewresearch –

Leave a Comment