Washington Abortion Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

Washington Abortion Statistics 2023: Facts about Abortion in Washington reflect the current socio-economic condition of the state.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Washington Abortion, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to start a Washington LLC business in 2023? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information.

How much of an impact will Washington Abortion Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

On this page, you’ll learn about the following:

Top Washington Abortion Statistics 2023

Top Washington Abortion Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 71 Washington Abortion Statistics on this page 🙂

Washington Abortion “Latest” Statistics

Internet searches and tweets concerning sex, birth control, and abortion significantly surged around the time that new episodes aired, according to one analysis24.^[1]
According to the CDC, in 1972 there were 24 legal abortion-related fatalities in the United States and 39 illegal abortions.^[2]
Patients who had abortions would make up 13% of all patients if the 327,653 abortion procedures were administered to individual patients.^[3]
There was a 21% rise in clinics from 2014 when there were 33 clinics out of 50 abortions.^[4]
Before 1973, it’s believed that 12 million U.S. women turned to illegal abortion each year, and those unsafe abortions resulted in up to 5,000 fatalities each year.^[2]
According to CDC statistics, 85.5% of abortion seekers in other us regions that disclosed the marital status of their clients were single.^[5]
Based on this computation, proponents and opponents of abortion rights have estimated that between 15 and 37% of an organization’s nongovernment healthcare income is generated from providing abortion services annually.^[3]
According to the most recent statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as of 2019, Washington had 11.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 1544.^[5]
According to CDC statistics, over 73% of abortion seekers were between the ages of 20 and 30.^[5]
According to the research, black women had abortion rates that were 36 times greater than those of white women and 18 times higher than those of Hispanic women.^[5]
According to national statistics, most of these abortions were carried out at fewer than six weeks of pregnancy, with over 90% occurring in the first trimester.^[5]
As a result, there were 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 15-44, which is an 8% drop from the rate of 14.6 in 2014.^[4]
Over 90% of abortions, according to a 2012 Brookings Institution analysis, are performed because of an unplanned pregnancy.^[6]
Teenage abortion rates in the state decreased by 35% between 2009 and 2012, and nationwide rates are also down.^[7]
Between 2014 and 2017, Washington’s abortion rate dropped by 12%, from 13.7 to 12.1 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age.^[4]
In those counties, 38% of women of reproductive age resided, meaning they would have had to travel elsewhere to have an abortion. 1 one third of patients who had an abortion in 2014 had to travel over 25 miles one way to get there.^[4]
The group also calculated that, in 2019, 40 million or 58% of American women of reproductive age resided in states that restrict access to abortion.^[8]
Rural women drove an average of 12 miles farther each way to have an abortion from the earlier to the later time period, and the percentage of women who had the operation in a rural county fell from 25% to 3%.^[9]
According to the Planned Parenthood website, for instance, abortion during the first trimester may cost up to $1,500.^[3]
When abortion services are compared to all the other services that planned parenthood offers, the 3% number that it claims is false.^[3]
According to a pew research center survey conducted in 2014, 60% of Americans said that abortion should be allowed in all or most circumstances.^[10]
When compared to the national rate of 196 abortions per 1,000 women in 2008, the most recent year for which data is available, this represents a significant decrease of between 62% and 78%.^[11]
Estimates of miscarriage rates and reported adolescent birth and abortion rates are used to compute teen pregnancy rates.^[12]
Compared to the 1,671 facilities in 2014, there were 1,587 facilities offering abortions in the united states in 2017. This is a 5% drop.^[4]
The percentage of rural women who left the state for an abortion rose from 8% to 14% between 1984 and 1993.^[9]
Comparing abortion services to two other kinds of care that pregnant women get through planned parenthood, the 94% statistic is equally false.^[3]
Compared to 1993–1994, 62% of rural women traveled 50 miles or more to have an abortion during the earlier time period.^[9]
Although abortion rates have decreased for all income categories since 2008, the research found that the decrease for those with lower incomes was the lowest (26%).^[5]
According to a recent study by Washington University researchers, offering free birth control to women significantly lowers the number of unintended pregnancies and lowers abortion rates by 62 to 78% when compared to the national average.^[11]
In 2017, 16% of facilities were abortion clinics, with over 50% of patient visits being for abortions. 35% were general clinics. Hospitals made up 33%, and private doctors’ offices made up 16%.^[4]
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 49% of the abortions carried out in Washington were out-of.^[13]
States passed 483 new abortion restrictions between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2019, making up roughly 40% of all abortion restrictions passed by states in the decades following Roe v. Wade.^[4]
52% of women of reproductive age will probably be subject to increased abortion restrictions.^[14]
According to a pew research center survey of Americans, 60% believe that abortion should be permitted in all or most circumstances.^[10]
Similar trends were seen in the nation’s adolescent birthrate, which fell 44% from a high in 1991, and its teen abortion rate, which fell 66% from a peak in 1988.^[1]
If each woman who had an abortion went to the clinic only once for the procedure, that year’s visits to the clinic would have been 7%.^[3]
Although there were definitely other abortion-related fatalities, it is improbable that the total was above a thousand.^[2]
An organization that opposes abortion rights, compares abortions to two other types of treatments offered to pregnant patients or pregnancy care to arrive at its 94% number.^[3]
According to a study by Washington University school of medicine researchers, offering free birth control to women significantly decreased unintended pregnancies and decreased abortion rates by a range of 62.7% compared to the national average.^[6]
Although birth statistics are based on an almost complete accounting of every birth in the nation, pregnancy statistics also include an estimate of the number of miscarriages and abortions based on a variety of reporting methods and surveys.^[15]

Washington Abortion “Adolescent” Statistics

Consider the fact that a teen birth rate of 26.5 births per 1000 adolescent females is a proportion of 26.5% of young girls giving birth each year to understand the differences.^[15]
When compared to the national average, its adolescent birth rate decreased by 39% over that period.^[7]
These wards, which are 93% and 94% respectively African American, account for more than half of all teenage births in the district, yet only make up around 15% of the city’s female adolescent population.^[16]
There was no connection between abstinence instruction and the statewide adolescent education % of high school graduates who took the seat in 2005–2006.^[12]
According to the CDC, expenditures associated with government-funded health care, child welfare, and increased imprisonment rates for adolescent mothers resulted in savings to taxpayers of almost $12 billion in only 2010.^[7]
According to a 2014 research, adolescent births decreased by 6% in the 18 months after the program’s first airing.^[17]
From a high in 1990, adolescent pregnancies in the U.S. have decreased by 51%, with a 15% decrease between 2008 and 2010.^[1]
Compared to adolescent pregnancy rates, teen birth rates have more current data, and those data show that the reduction in teen births has persisted. It decreased by 10% from 2012 to 2013, reaching the lowest reported rate for the United States of 2.7 per 1,000.^[1]
These wards, which are 93 and 94% respectively African American, account for more than half of all teenage births in the district, yet only make up around 15% of the city’s female adolescent population.^[16]

Washington Abortion “Teen” Statistics

The Colorado research, which found a 40% decrease in births among teenagers aged 15 to 19, from 2009 to 2013, preceded the CDC findings by a year.^[7]
According to research issued today by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Colorado saw the greatest percentage decline in birth rates among teenagers aged 15 to 19 nationwide between 2007 and 2012.^[7]
For instance, a teenager who becomes pregnant is more likely to struggle to complete high school, which often results in fewer future employment options and income.^[1]
48% of all pregnancies in Washington, not only those involving teenagers, are deemed unplanned by the women themselves.^[15]
Given that they make up the bulk of sexually active youths, it is not unexpected that 69% of teen pregnancies happen between 18 and 19 years.^[1]
For instance, recent research 49 claims that the nonuse of contraception is to blame for 52% of all unwanted births among teens and adults in the U.S.. 43% are because of inconsistent or improper usage, whereas just 5% are because of technique failure.^[12]
A recent study 34 that showed that teenage moms are more likely to drop out of school lends evidence to this. Compared to 89% of women who had not given birth as teenagers, just 51% of teen moms had obtained their high school graduation by the age of 22.^[12]

Washington Abortion “Pregnancy” Statistics

Delaying first sex contributed more to the decrease in pregnancy among 15to 17-year-olds, accounting for 23% of the decrease.^[1]

Washington Abortion “Other” Statistics

Descriptive statistics by abstinence education level 95% results of the confidence interval level n median.^[12]
Each year, substantially more us pregnancies—about 50% of all pregnancies—are not intended than in other wealthy nations.^[6]
Another noteworthy research examined the effects of the internet and concluded that the growing accessibility of broadband internet might account for at least 13% of the overall reduction between 1999 and 2007.^[17]
Children of young moms struggle academically and are 50% more likely to repeat a grade than children of older mothers. They also have a higher chance of dropping out of high school.^[18]
Compared to their counterparts with older parents, who receive high school graduation at an average rate of 81%, just roughly two-thirds of children born to young moms do.^[18]
Compared to women who don’t have children at that period, young women who give birth while enrolled in a community college have a 65% lower likelihood of finishing their degree.^[18]
Abortion operations make up 3% of planned parenthood’s total services when all other services are considered equally.^[3]
The outcome compared to individuals who utilized an IUD or an implant, those who opted for short-term treatments like the pill or the patch were 20 times more likely to get pregnant unintentionally.^[7]
From 8% to 15% in 1993 and 1994, the percentage of rural women who abort their pregnancies after the first trimester has grown.^[9]
According to research conducted in St. Louis, 36% of women missed days of work because they lacked the necessary menstrual hygiene products.^[10]
Taussig multiplied it to arrive at 3,508 birth registrations each year since the states made up 26% of all birth registrations in the country.^[2]
Teen birthrate hits an all-time low led by a 50% decline among Hispanics and Blacks.^[17]
Abortion rights opponents have questioned this definition, claiming the 3% statistic deceives the public.^[3]
NSFG statistics show that among girls aged 15–19, condom usage climbed from 38% in 1995 to 52% in 2006–2010 and that it gradually increased among men from 64% in 1995 to 75% in 2006–2010.^[1]

How Useful is Washington Abortion

Advocates for reproductive rights argue that access to safe and legal abortion is crucial for women’s health and autonomy. They argue that when a woman is faced with an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy, she should have the right to make a decision about her own body without government interference. Washington has been at the forefront of protecting and expanding these rights, enacting legislation to guarantee access to abortion services regardless of income or insurance coverage. This proactive approach has been lauded by supporters as a necessary step to ensure that women have control over their reproductive health.

On the other hand, opponents of abortion believe that it is morally wrong and should be restricted or banned entirely. They argue that it is the state’s responsibility to protect the rights and interests of the unborn child, and thus, abortion should be limited to cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother’s life. Despite Washington’s efforts to safeguard abortion rights, anti-abortion groups continue to push back, advocating for policies that would restrict access and funding for abortion procedures.

In examining the usefulness of Washington abortion, it is essential to consider the implications beyond just the legal framework. Access to abortion services also depends on factors such as availability, affordability, and stigma. While Washington has made strides in ensuring that abortion is legally accessible, there are still challenges that individuals may face in seeking these services. For example, rural areas may have limited providers or clinics, making it difficult for individuals to access care. Additionally, financial barriers such as lack of insurance coverage or high out-of-pocket costs can pose significant challenges for those seeking abortion services.

Furthermore, the stigma surrounding abortion can deter individuals from seeking care, even if it is legally available. Negative societal attitudes and judgment can create barriers to access and contribute to feelings of shame or guilt. This stigma can be particularly pronounced in conservative communities or among certain religious groups, leading to increased obstacles for individuals seeking abortion services.

In evaluating the usefulness of Washington abortion, it is also essential to consider the broader societal impact. Access to safe and legal abortion is not just a matter of individual choice but a public health issue. Restrictions on abortion can lead to unsafe and illegal procedures, putting women’s health and lives at risk. Ensuring that abortion services are available and accessible is critical for promoting women’s health and well-being.

Ultimately, the usefulness of Washington abortion lies in its ability to provide comprehensive, compassionate, and respectful care to those in need. By upholding reproductive rights and expanding access to abortion services, Washington can set an example for other states to follow in ensuring that individuals have control over their own bodies and reproductive futures. The debate over abortion will undoubtedly continue, but it is crucial that policymakers prioritize the health and well-being of those seeking care and work towards a more just and equitable society.

Reference

guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2014/09/what-behind-declines-teen-pregnancy-rates
washingtonpost – https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/29/planned-parenthoods-false-stat-thousands-women-died-every-year-before-roe/
washingtonpost – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/08/12/for-planned-parenthood-abortion-stats-3-percent-and-94-percent-are-both-misleading/
guttmacher – https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-washington
seattletimes – https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/what-data-shows-about-wa-abortions/
wustl – https://source.wustl.edu/2012/10/abortion-rates-plummet-with-free-birth-control/
washingtonpost – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2014/08/20/the-simple-policy-that-led-americas-biggest-drop-in-teen-pregnancies/
politico – https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/03/bortion-statistics-by-state-map-00029740
jstor – https://www.jstor.org/stable/2991572
wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Washington
wustl – https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/access-to-free-birth-control-reduces-abortion-rates/
nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3194801/
abort73 – https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/washington/
washingtonpost – https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/06/24/women-of-color-end-of-roe/
powertodecide – https://powertodecide.org/what-we-do/information/national-state-data/washington
prb – https://www.prb.org/resources/dcs-teenage-moms-need-their-own-moms/
washingtonpost – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/04/28/teen-birth-rate-hits-all-time-low-led-by-50-percent-decline-among-hispanics-and-blacks/
ncsl – https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/teen-pregnancy-affects-graduation-rates-postcard.aspx