Admission-Based Nonprofit Statistics

Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Admission-Based Nonprofit Statistics 2023: Facts about Admission-Based Nonprofit outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Admission-Based Nonprofit, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Admission-Based Nonprofit Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Admission-Based Nonprofit Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 21 Admission-Based Nonprofit Statistics on this page 🙂

Admission-Based Nonprofit “Latest” Statistics

  • Enrollment at the 3,250 lowest-funded community colleges and four-year universities is 37% black and Hispanic.[1]
  • Less than 10 weekly new admissions is considered Low, between 10 and 19.9 is considered Medium, and greater than or equal to 20 is considered High, according to the levels for weekly new admissions that is based on the CDC’s Community Level framework.[2]
  • Men graduated at a greater percentage than girls in private for profit universities, 31 vs. 28%.[3]
  • First-time fulltime undergraduate students who started pursuing a bachelor’s degree at 4-year colleges in autumn 2014 had an overall 6 year graduation rate of 64% in 2020.[3]
  • Intensive care bed counts are reported on the AHA Annual Survey by approximately 80% of hospitals.[4]
  • According to the Professional Research Corporation poll, patients regularly rate their experience with overall quality of treatment as outstanding or in the top 10% nationwide.[5]
  • The naturalization rate over ten years was greatest for those born in Africa (76%), followed by South America (64%), and North Americans (27%), according to migration[6]
  • About half (1.6 million) were temporary workers and their families, followed by 35% who were foreign students and their families (1.1 million).[6]
  • In 2019, around 58% of U.S immigrants had private health insurance, compared to 69% of U.S citizens, and 30% had access to public health insurance, as opposed to 36% of U.S citizens.[6]
  • Due in major part to the high levels of immigration from Europe between 1860 and 1920, the percentage of immigrants in the population ranged between 13% and over 15%, culminating at 14.8% in 1890.[6]
  • Government figures that are now accessible to the public show that more over 500,000 people in the United States are eligible for TPS.[6]
  • Only 11,411 refugees, or 18% of the 62,500 seats allotted for resettlement in FY 2021, were relocated in the United States because of the resettlement program’s low capacity and logistical difficulties associated to COVID-19.[6]
  • In 2019, less than 1% of immigrants had children under the age of 5, compared to 7% of U.S born children in this age range.[6]
  • According to DHS estimates, 42.7 million people entered the country that year as nonimmigrants using a variety of temporary visas, and each of them received admission an average of 1.8 times.[6]
  • In 2019, immigrants comprised 13.7% of the total U.S. population, a figure that remains short of the record high of 14.8% in 1890.[6]
  • After a 12% decline from 2000 to 2010, when there were 2.7 million first generation immigrant children, it decreased by 9% between 2010 and 2019, from 2.4 million to 2.2 million.[6]
  • Mexicans make up the biggest group of immigrants in the U.S, accounting for 24% of all immigrants in 2019, down from 30% in 2000.[6]
  • About 52% of all immigrants to the U.S in 2019 were female, slightly more women and girls than men or boys.[6]
  • The Pew Research Center has projected that the immigrant-origin share of the population will rise to about 36 percent by 2065.[6]
  • Admission fees are subject to 4% state sales tax as well as any municipal sales taxes that may apply depending on where the amusement center is located, according to New York State Tax Law.[7]
  • Admission fees to horse racing tracks and simulcast facilities are subject to state sales tax of 4% but are not subject to local sales tax or the 3/8% sales tax that applies within the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District.[7]

Also Read

How Useful is Admission Based Nonprofit

One of the main arguments in favor of admission-based nonprofits is that they can generate revenue directly from the people who benefit from their programs or services. By charging an entrance fee or ticket price, these organizations can potentially cover their operating costs and reduce their dependence on external funding sources. This can create a sense of financial stability and autonomy for the organization, allowing them to focus more on their mission and programs rather than constantly worrying about securing donations.

Additionally, admission-based nonprofits may attract a wider range of supporters, including those who may not typically donate to charitable organizations. People may be more willing to pay for a ticket to an event or exhibit than to make a donation, as they perceive a tangible benefit or experience in return for their money. This can expand the organization’s reach and potentially engage a more diverse audience, both in terms of demographics and financial means.

However, critics of admission-based nonprofits raise several valid concerns about the implications of this funding model. One of the main criticisms is that it can create barriers to access for individuals who may not be able to afford the entrance fee. By charging for their services, these organizations risk excluding marginalized or low-income communities from participating in their programs, potentially perpetuating inequalities in access to educational or cultural resources.

Moreover, the emphasis on generating revenue through admission fees may prioritize financial considerations over the organization’s mission and impact. If these nonprofits focus on maximizing ticket sales or attendance numbers, they may be incentivized to prioritize activities or events that draw large crowds, rather than those that best serve their target audience or community. This can lead to a shift in priorities, where financial goals take precedence over social or educational objectives.

Lastly, the long-term sustainability of admission-based nonprofits is also a concern. While entrance fees may provide a steady revenue stream in the short term, they may not be reliable sources of funding in the face of economic downturns or fluctuating attendance numbers. Organizations with high fixed costs or limited programming may struggle to remain financially viable if they rely too heavily on admission fees as their primary revenue source.

In conclusion, while admission-based nonprofits can offer financial stability and broaden their donor base, they must carefully balance the benefits of this funding model with the potential drawbacks. It is essential for these organizations to prioritize accessibility, equity, and mission alignment in their revenue generation strategies, to ensure they remain true to their core values and effectively serve their communities in the long run.


  1. hechingerreport –
  2. covidactnow –
  3. ed –
  4. aha –
  5. bjc –
  6. migrationpolicy –
  7. ny –

Leave a Comment