Application Shielding Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Application Shielding Statistics 2023: Facts about Application Shielding outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Application Shielding, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Application Shielding Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Application Shielding Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 10 Application Shielding Statistics on this page 🙂

Application Shielding “Latest” Statistics

  • While it is hard to determine the precise percentage of person shielding, 62% of respondents said they strictly adhered to government guidelines.[1]
  • By obtaining shielding advice, 20% of CEV patients report being unable to receive certain forms of treatment, and 10% report being unable to get any care.[1]
  • 49% of the surveyed said they had left home at least once following receiving shielding advice, and 13% of CEV participants said they had had visitors in the previous week who weren’t nurses, caregivers, or support staff.[1]
  • 33% of CEV participants said they partly followed the shielding advice, while 62% said they entirely followed it.[1]
  • 61% of clinically severely vulnerable people reported no change in their mental health after getting shielding advice, while 35% said it worsened or was considerably worse.[1]
  • Financial institutions have reported an increase in cyberattacks that result in credential breaches by over 67%.[2]
  • Static Noise occurs when an electrical field distorts a signal and may be prevented by utilizing continuous foil shields with 100% shielding efficiency and proper grounding practices.[3]
  • The conductive channel was successfully constructed in that investigation by setting a percolation threshold at around 1% of the CNT content.[4]
  • The increase in shielding efficacy from 1.5% or higher of the steel fiber content has a negligible impact.[4]
  • At a frequency of 1 GHz, it showed 20 dB of shielding efficacy when combined with 1.0% CNTs.[4]

Also Read

How Useful is Application Shielding

Proponents of application shielding argue that it provides an added layer of protection that traditional security measures may not offer. By integrating security features directly into the code of an application, developers can make it more difficult for hackers to exploit vulnerabilities or gain unauthorized access. This can help to prevent common attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and buffer overflows, which can lead to data breaches and other security incidents.

In addition to protecting against external threats, application shielding can also help to prevent reverse engineering and tampering with the code of an application. This can be particularly important for businesses that rely on proprietary software to drive their operations, as unauthorized access to source code could result in intellectual property theft or other serious consequences.

Despite these potential benefits, some critics have raised concerns about the practicality and effectiveness of application shielding. One common argument is that this approach may create a false sense of security, leading developers to neglect other important security measures such as proper input validation, secure coding practices, and regular security audits. In reality, application shielding should be seen as just one piece of the cybersecurity puzzle, rather than a standalone solution.

Furthermore, critics also point out that application shielding can be costly and resource-intensive to implement. Not only does it require specialized tools and expertise, but it can also slow down the development process and make it more difficult to maintain and update applications over time. This can be particularly challenging for small businesses or independent developers with limited resources.

Another potential drawback of application shielding is its reliance on security through obscurity. By attempting to hide or obfuscate the inner workings of an application, developers may inadvertently make it more difficult for security researchers to identify and patch vulnerabilities. This could ultimately weaken the overall security posture of an application, rather than enhancing it.

In conclusion, while application shielding can be a valuable tool in the cybersecurity toolkit, it is not a silver bullet solution. Developers should approach it with caution and consider its limitations in the context of a comprehensive security strategy. By combining application shielding with other best practices such as secure coding, regular testing, and ongoing monitoring, organizations can better protect their applications from a wide range of threats and vulnerabilities.

Reference


  1. webinarcare – https://webinarcare.com/best-application-shielding-software/application-shielding-statistics/
  2. appsealing – https://www.appsealing.com/app-shielding/
  3. multicable – https://www.multicable.com/resources/reference-data/signal-interference-and-cable-shielding/
  4. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696092/

Leave a Comment