Online Proctoring Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Online Proctoring Statistics 2023: Facts about Online Proctoring outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Online Proctoring, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Online Proctoring Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Online Proctoring Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 15 Online Proctoring Statistics on this page 🙂

Online Proctoring “Latest” Statistics

  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[1]
  • According to a survey done in May by the publishing and digital education company Wiley, 93% of instructors believe that students are more inclined to cheat online than in person.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[2]
  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[2]
  • For using “tutor-provided solutions” to exam problems from Chegg, more than 200 of the 800 students in a single Statistics 311 class at North Carolina State were recommended for disciplinary action, according to Tyler Johnson, the course coordinator.[2]
  • According to a 2011 research by Ambient Insight Research, 10.65 million students in higher education attended some of their courses online at the time, while 1.25 million students completed all of their courses online (Adkins, 2011).[3]
  • Proctor usage has increased by up to 500% in companies, and there are growing valid worries about their intrusiveness, potential bias, and efficacy.[4]
  • Concerns about online proctors prompted a U.S. Proctorio, ProctorU, and ExamSoft, three of the main proctoring companies that have together presided over at least 30 million exams during the pandemic, were asked for more information in a letter of inquiry from the Senate.[4]
  • Many students taking online courses now take tens of thousands of online exams each month, including an increasing number of students taking face-to-face classes (30,000 exams at Western Governors University alone).[5]
  • According to industry insiders, there are now at least 15 online proctoring companies, more than twice as many as there were just five years ago.[5]
  • Between 30,000 and 40,000 tests are proctored online each year at the 17 campuses of UNC.[5]
  • Over 12,000 tests are proctored online each month at NOVA, where 23,000 students enroll in online courses.[5]
  • The 6,000 full-time students at CSU Channel Islands take 5 to 7 percent of their classes online, but all of their tests are proctored in person, according to Leafstedt.[5]
  • 26 percent of the universities reported using online proctoring services that didn’t adhere to their accessibility guidelines.[6]

Also Read

How Useful is Online Proctoring

The proponents of online proctoring argue that it is a necessary tool for maintaining the credibility and validity of online degrees and certifications. With the rise of online education, cheating has also become more prevalent, as students can easily access information and resources during exams. Online proctoring software aims to combat cheating by monitoring students during exams through the use of webcams, microphones, and screen-sharing technology.

In theory, online proctoring seems like a foolproof solution to prevent cheating. However, in practice, there are several limitations and drawbacks to using online proctoring software. One of the main concerns with online proctoring is the invasion of students’ privacy. Students are required to install software on their personal devices that can access their webcams and microphones, raising concerns about the potential for data breaches and surveillance.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of online proctoring in detecting and deterring cheating has been called into question. Many students have found ways to circumvent online proctoring software by using secondary devices, hiring proxies to take exams for them, or simply cheating in other ways that are not easily detected by the software. This raises concerns about the accuracy and reliability of online proctoring in ensuring academic integrity.

Another major drawback of online proctoring is the potential for technical issues and glitches during exams. Many students have reported having their exams interrupted or terminated due to technical problems with the proctoring software, causing unnecessary stress and anxiety. Additionally, some students may not have access to a reliable internet connection or compatible devices, making it difficult for them to participate in online proctored exams.

In addition to these practical concerns, online proctoring also has implications for equity and access in education. Students from marginalized and underserved communities may be disproportionately impacted by online proctoring, as they may not have the necessary resources or support to effectively navigate the technical requirements of online exams. This raises questions about the fairness and inclusivity of online proctoring in higher education.

Overall, while online proctoring may have some benefits in combating cheating and maintaining academic integrity, it also comes with a host of challenges and drawbacks that cannot be overlooked. As educational institutions continue to explore the use of online proctoring, it is essential that they consider the wider implications and consequences of implementing such technology in online learning environments. Ultimately, the usefulness of online proctoring may vary depending on the context and specific needs of individual institutions and students.

Reference

  1. educause – https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/2/proctoring-software-in-higher-ed-prevalence-and-patterns
  2. hechingerreport – https://hechingerreport.org/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-cheating/
  3. umn – https://open.lib.umn.edu/innovativeteaching/chapter/under-the-watchful-eye-of-online-proctoring/
  4. eff – https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/long-overdue-reckoning-online-proctoring-companies-may-finally-be-here
  5. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/05/10/online-exam-proctoring-catches-cheaters-raises-concerns
  6. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/11/online-proctoring-surging-during-covid-19

Leave a Comment