Operational Risk Management Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Operational Risk Management Statistics 2023: Facts about Operational Risk Management outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Operational Risk Management, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Operational Risk Management Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Operational Risk Management Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 23 Operational Risk Management Statistics on this page 🙂

Operational Risk Management “Latest” Statistics

  • 57% of senior-level executives consider “risk and compliance” to be one of the top two risk areas for which they are unprepared.[1]
  • Only 36% of businesses have a formal enterprise risk management (ERM) program in place.[1]
  • 69% of CEOs are unsure that their existing risk management policies and procedures will be sufficient to satisfy future demands.[1]
  • In the last three years, 62% of firms had faced a critical risk incident.[1]
  • Banks rate operational risk (including cyber risk and third-party risk), regulatory compliance, and credit risk as their top three risk management problems.[1]
  • Risk management takes up a relatively modest portion of board meeting time — approximately 9% on average.[1]
  • 65% of firms have “reactive” or “basic” policy management procedures in place (as opposed to maturing or advanced).[1]
  • 44% of firms want to deploy or expand/upgrade their existing GRC or risk management software solution.[1]
  • In 2017, more than 900 regulatory agencies released more than 200 regulation changes every day on average.[1]
  • Only 47% of chief compliance officers state that their firm has an enterprise-wide reporting system that combines with compliance monitoring across departments and business divisions.[1]
  • Less than three-quarters of firms (69%) use technology to assist compliance activities.[1]
  • 87% of firms consider technology risk management to be a segmented, reactive activity rather than “an organization-wide function for proactive risk management.”[1]
  • Over 75% of CEOs indicate that their firms either do not have a way to evaluate cyber risk (49%) or do not know if their organization does (27%).[1]
  • Despite the fact that automated procedures provide the most proactive approach to risk reduction, only 18% of firms use them for IT risk data collecting and reporting.[1]
  • Only 13% of firms utilize key risk indicators (KRIs) consistently to understand and manage IT risk.[1]
  • Only around half of internal audit departments (48%) identify and monitor critical risk indicators (KRIs).[1]
  • Internal audit, according to 60% of chief audit officers, rarely or never gives assurance on management information submitted to the board.[1]
  • In 2019, 22% of firms intend to make significant changes to their BCM strategy and/or business continuity plans.[1]
  • One major bank dealt with unacceptable false-positive rates in anti-money laundering (AML) detection, which reached 96%.[2]
  • The North American bank spotted undesirable abnormalities before they became severe problems by using sophisticated analytics models to analyze behavioral trends across 20,000 workers.[2]
  • More than 30% of risk executives identify seven risk categories as the greatest challenges to their company’s capacity to expand.[3]
  • Risk executives (72%) are unanimous in their belief that leveraging digital transformation projects is critical to their organizations’ development in 2022.[3]
  • Late last February 2021, Europe’s largest bank revealed plans to shrink office space by 40%.[4]

Also Read

How Useful is Operational Risk Management

One of the primary purposes of ORM is to identify potential risks within an organization’s processes and activities. By doing so, companies can proactively assess and address these risks before they have a chance to negatively impact the business. This proactive approach not only helps in preventing potential losses but also enhances the overall efficiency and effectiveness of operations.

Operational risk can come in many forms, including human error, system failures, regulatory compliance issues, fraud, and cybersecurity threats, among others. Failing to adequately manage these risks can lead to significant financial losses, damage to reputation, and even legal consequences. Therefore, implementing a robust ORM framework is essential for protecting an organization against these potential risks.

A key aspect of ORM is the development of risk mitigation strategies. This involves analyzing the likelihood and impact of each identified risk and taking appropriate measures to minimize or eliminate the potential harm. These strategies could include implementing stronger internal controls, enhancing training programs for employees, increasing cybersecurity measures, or revising business processes to reduce vulnerabilities.

Furthermore, ORM is not a one-time activity but rather an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and assessment. As businesses evolve and grow, new risks may emerge, and existing risks may change in nature or significance. Therefore, it is important for organizations to periodically review and update their ORM strategies to ensure they remain relevant and effective.

In addition to mitigating potential risks, ORM can also have a positive impact on an organization’s overall performance and competitive advantage. A proactive approach to risk management can lead to increased operational efficiency, cost savings, and a more resilient business model. By minimizing disruption and uncertainty, companies can focus on pursuing growth opportunities and achieving their strategic objectives.

Another important benefit of ORM is its contribution to building trust and confidence among stakeholders. Customers, investors, regulators, and other key stakeholders are more likely to trust and support an organization that demonstrates a strong commitment to risk management. By proactively managing operational risks, companies can enhance their reputation, credibility, and long-term sustainability.

In conclusion, ORM is a highly valuable and indispensable tool for businesses operating in today’s complex and unpredictable environment. By identifying, assessing, and mitigating operational risks, organizations can protect themselves from potential harm, improve their operational efficiency, and enhance their overall competitiveness. It is essential for businesses of all sizes and industries to prioritize ORM and invest resources in developing robust risk management strategies. Ultimately, the success and resilience of an organization depend on its ability to manage operational risks effectively.

Reference

  1. quantivate – https://quantivate.com/grc-risk-compliance-statistics/
  2. mckinsey – https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/the-future-of-operational-risk-management-in-financial-services
  3. pwc – https://www.pwc.com/us/en/library/pulse-survey/executive-views-2022/risk-management-leaders.html
  4. risk – https://www.risk.net/risk-management/7800126/top-10-operational-risks-for-2021

Leave a Comment